Re: [gmx-users] converting .xpm to .eps

2013-12-20 Thread Hector Manuel Manzanilla Granados
Hi, I need some help. In these days, I install one NVIDIA target (GTX 760 on UBUNTU 12.04), together with toolkit 5.5 of CUDA. Apparently CUDA runs fine, the problem is that I can't to compile GROMACS in CUDA, I think that have some mistake in the installation of cuda, may I somebody help me

Re: [gmx-users] How to process D-amino acid peptide?

2013-12-20 Thread David van der Spoel
On 2013-12-20 07:23, hummingbird wrote: I am doing a simulation of a system including a peptide made up of 36 D-amino acid residues. I am a new user and have no idea how to process D-amino acid. When I try pdb2gmx, all residues are changed to L-type in the output GRO file. Could anybody help?

Re: [gmx-users] converting .xpm to .eps

2013-12-20 Thread bipin singh
Not sure, might be something going wrong due to large dimension of your matrix. Which Gromacs version you are using. Others may provide some clues. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Nidhi Jatana nidhijat...@bic-svc.ac.inwrote: Dear Sir/Madam Please find attached the file containing the error.

Re: [gmx-users] converting .xpm to .eps

2013-12-20 Thread Nidhi Jatana
I am using gromacs version 4.6. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 2:39 PM, bipin singh bipinel...@gmail.com wrote: Not sure, might be something going wrong due to large dimension of your matrix. Which Gromacs version you are using. Others may provide some clues. On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:04 AM,

Re: [gmx-users] converting .xpm to .eps

2013-12-20 Thread Nidhi Jatana
How do you fix the matrix size? Should I do it while generation of .xpm file or while converting it to .eps and using which option? Regards Nidhi On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:35 PM, Carsten Kutzner ckut...@gwdg.de wrote: On 12/20/2013 10:09 AM, bipin singh wrote: Not sure, might be something

Re: [gmx-users] Implicit solvation: nonpolar term?

2013-12-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 12/19/13 7:33 PM, Robert Darkins wrote: On 19/12/13 23:31, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 12/19/13 6:14 PM, rdwducl wrote: Thanks for the reply Justin but I'm confused. Why must the atoms be bonded? Ultimately I plan to model micellisation whereby surfactants, which only interact with each

Re: [gmx-users] table-extension distance appears to be over-ridden by .mdp file cut-off values

2013-12-20 Thread ploetz
Hi Justin, Thanks for your reply. I agree with you that the .mdp file rlist=rcoul=rvdw cutoff is really being applied, but the documentation in the manual about tabulated interaction functions does not give me the impression that that is the intent. It reads like the user can have different