[gmx-users] Solid state barostat

2018-03-20 Thread dgfd dgdfg
I am trying to simulate amorphous organic solid system with Parrinello-Rahman at P=1 Bar. The maximal dt value which holds molecules together is 0.0008 and it's increasing leads to evaporation. What may be incorrect? Berendsen works well with dt=0.001 but it isn't recommended. mdp options for p

[gmx-users] Regarding combination rules in gromos53a6 ff

2018-03-20 Thread Apramita Chand
Dear GROMACS users, I want to use the geometric mean of both sigma (sigma i sigmaj)and epsilon(epsilon i epsilon j) as a combination rule in my simulation. According to the combination rules in the manual, the combination 3 incorporates Vii=sigma and Wii= epsilon along with geometric mean of Ci(6)

[gmx-users] source code for velocity information

2018-03-20 Thread 刘杰
Dear all, Iam trying to add viscidity bond code to gromacsc 4.0.7. I found the harmonic bond code in bondfree.c ,but i could not conform which source document include the velocity information . Can somebody please advise me on how to overcome this issue?Thank you. Regards, jieliu -- Gromacs Us

[gmx-users] source code for velocity information

2018-03-20 Thread 刘杰
Dear all, Iam trying to add viscidity bond code to gromacsc 4.0.7. I found the harmonic bond code in bondfree.c ,but i could not conform which source document include the velocity information . Can somebody please advise me on how to overcome this issue?Thank you. Regards, jieliu -- Grom

Re: [gmx-users] Potential energy

2018-03-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/20/18 7:15 PM, Alex wrote: Thanks Justin. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 3/20/18 2:40 PM, Alex wrote: Dear all, The potential energy of my system after two minimization steps (with and without constrained) is converging well, however, it is still positive

Re: [gmx-users] Potential energy

2018-03-20 Thread Alex
Thanks Justin. On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 3:02 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 3/20/18 2:40 PM, Alex wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> The potential energy of my system after two minimization steps (with and >> without constrained) is converging well, however, it is still positive >> around 1000 kj/mol

Re: [gmx-users] Topol file for a bigger system

2018-03-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/20/18 6:06 PM, Alex wrote: On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: On 3/19/18 8:15 PM, Alex wrote: Dear all, Using topolbuild I can generate the case.gro, case.top, ffcase.itp and posrecase.itp out of a case.mol2 which contain only a single molecule of X. Also, using

Re: [gmx-users] Topol file for a bigger system

2018-03-20 Thread Alex
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 8:57 PM, Justin Lemkul wrote: > > > On 3/19/18 8:15 PM, Alex wrote: > >> Dear all, >> >> Using topolbuild I can generate the case.gro, case.top, ffcase.itp and >> posrecase.itp out of a case.mol2 which contain only a single molecule of >> X. >> >> Also, using the "gmx inse

Re: [gmx-users] nve energy conservation

2018-03-20 Thread Jo
Thanks everyone for your reply. I see your point that it could just be some error cancellation from constraints and parameters. I was previously using gromacs-5.1.4, and changed to gromacs-2018, and the drift seems to be much smaller! I get something similar to what Mark had posted -0.25 kJ/mo

[gmx-users] Regarding time steps for calculation of Hydrogen Bond Dynamics

2018-03-20 Thread Dilip H N
Hello all, I have run a simulation for 10 ns (0.001 * 1000 = 1 ps) and have saved the data for every 0.5 ps (nstxout= 500etc.,...) (which comes to 2 frames...). Since if i extract the trajectory in .gro format for the full simulation,it will be such a huge file, so i intended to ex

Re: [gmx-users] Potential energy

2018-03-20 Thread Justin Lemkul
On 3/20/18 2:40 PM, Alex wrote: Dear all, The potential energy of my system after two minimization steps (with and without constrained) is converging well, however, it is still positive around 1000 kj/mol ! I think it is not a good sign for my system, but, what could be the reason and how I ca

[gmx-users] Potential energy

2018-03-20 Thread Alex
Dear all, The potential energy of my system after two minimization steps (with and without constrained) is converging well, however, it is still positive around 1000 kj/mol ! I think it is not a good sign for my system, but, what could be the reason and how I can overcome the issue? The system gen

Re: [gmx-users] crystal lattice topology generation

2018-03-20 Thread Alex
Prior to generating the topology (say, with x2top) use editconf on your coordinates to put the crystal in a box of size that's compatible with the periodicity and the number of unit cells in your crystal sample. Alex On 3/20/2018 10:49 AM, Bala subramanian wrote: Dear Grom. users, Greetings,

[gmx-users] crystal lattice topology generation

2018-03-20 Thread Bala subramanian
Dear Grom. users, Greetings, I have to simulate a crystal lattice with gromacs. In the unit cell, there are 16 copies of the mineral (Lets say 16 residues). If all residues have the same number of atoms, I can simply create the .rtp file for one residue and then proceed for the topology generatio

[gmx-users] Regarding combination rules in gromos53a6 ff

2018-03-20 Thread Apramita Chand
Dear GROMACS users, I want to use the geometric mean of both sigma (sigma i sigmaj)and epsilon(epsilon i epsilon j) as a combination rule in my simulation. According to the combination rules in the manual, the combination 3 incorporates Vii=sigma and Wii= epsilon along with geometric mean of Ci(6)

Re: [gmx-users] Free Energy solvation generate multiple dhdl.xvg output files

2018-03-20 Thread Javier Luque Di Salvo
Dear Wes, Thanks for clarifying, I did as you told and it worked. The resulting dG_hyd of NH4+ is -62.5 kJ/mol, while the experimental value is -285 kJ/mol (10.1039/FT9918702995). I am using OPLS and SPC/E water. Energy values of the last lambdas showed higher error bars, so now I am refining the

Re: [gmx-users] Separate structure from box

2018-03-20 Thread Wes Barnett
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:30 AM, rose rahmani wrote: > Hi, > I want to extract a structure in a box, i mean i want to extract a sheet > from the box of solution, because i dont have any separated .gro file from > my sheet. How can i do that? > Try creating an index file using "gmx make_ndx" to c

Re: [gmx-users] error in grompp step

2018-03-20 Thread Upendra N
Dear Mark sir, Thank you... I will try with the later versions. I am actually using modified version of gromacs-4.6.2[by J S Hub et al.,] , for calculating swaxs(small and wide angle x ray scattering) profiles and swaxs driven MD. I will learn to incorporate swaxs driven MD to later versions with y

[gmx-users] Free energy of VDW transformation from state A to State B

2018-03-20 Thread deepak bapat
Dear gmx-users I am trying to calculate free energy of VDW transformation. The system is very simple as I want to test the methodology. Single neutral LJ particle is transformed from state A to state B in TIP4P water. I have tried simulations with different state B LJ parameters without changing