Hello,
Support.
draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats documents operational issues/surprises that
may happen with route filtering. This is useful to document and be able to
reference.
Nits:
- the document uses, as example, the prefix "10.0.0.0/24" (from rfc 1918) while
IMO it should use a block f
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Christopher Morrow <
christopher.mor...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> There MAY be MiTM problems, but one argument is that there are
> whenever a packet crosses out of your administrative control. I don't
> know that the hyperbolic argument (everything is a mitm chance!)
hello,
I would like to call a second working group last call on
draft-ietf-grow-filtering-threats-02. we issued a previous one in december but
received no comments. The document is ready to publish, and now is your last
time to support or comment. WGLC will end 6/6/2014.
https://datatracker
