Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-02.txt

2016-07-07 Thread Christopher Morrow
On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 11:46 AM, Jay Borkenhagen wrote: > > Today anyone who wants to use RTBH has a number of things they need to > know about their providers' implementations: > > - is RTBH supported? if so: > - what signaling community is used? > - in-band or special ebgp-multihop session?

Re: [GROW] I-D Action: draft-ietf-grow-blackholing-02.txt

2016-07-07 Thread Jay Borkenhagen
Christopher Morrow writes: > On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Jay Borkenhagen wrote: > > > confusion and disappointment: "I sent the BLACKHOLE community to > > upstream-X and to upstream-Y, and I got different results. How come?" > > > > Doesn't this presuppose that the community ends up

Re: [GROW] Last Call: (BLACKHOLE BGP Community for Blackholing) to Proposed Standard

2016-07-07 Thread bruno.decraene
Hi all, I've not been following the discussion in all details, sorry for this. IINM, one comment was that it would be safer to use a non-transitive BGP community. In which case, you may be interested in the following draft which proposes to define "well known" non-transitive communities based on