Hi all,
In-line as [BM]
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 17:39 +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:58:40PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com
> wrote:
> > Hi Job, all
> >
> > > From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net] > Sent: Thursday, June
> > > 22, 2017 10:47 PM
> >
> > [...]
> >
> >
Hi all,
Comments in-line [BM]
On Mon, 2017-06-26 at 17:30 +0200, Job Snijders wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:14:19PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com
> wrote:
> > > From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net]
> >
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:47 PM
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > the plac
Local pref should be reduced when the route is received.
Consider router that learns a route on 2 interfaces.
The best path is on the interface that will go down.
The right thing to do is to change the best path to the other one.
Lowering local pref at the incomming interface will do that.
Thanks
It works for iBGP links too. An iBGP link is not to another AS.
Thanks,
Jakob.
> -Original Message-
> From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of heasley
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 10:07 AM
> To: bruno.decra...@orange.com
> Cc: grow@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [GROW] draft-ietf
Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:57:54PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com:
> > Suggestions:
> >
> > OLD Abstract:
> >This draft describes operational procedures aimed at reducing the
> >amount of traffic lost during planned maintenances of routers or
> >links, involving the shutdown of BG
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:57:54PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > NEW:
> > 7. IANA Considerations
> >The IANA has assigned the value 0x to the planned-shut
> >community in the "BGP Well-known Communities" registry. IANA is
> >requested to change the name plann
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:58:32PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > I think section 6 for link up should stay.
> > The cases desctibed are real, whether corner or not.
>
> [Bruno] agreed.
I agree it is valuable text, but the draft is about "SHUTDOWN" - not
about "Link Up". Perhaps sp
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 01:58:40PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi Job, all
>
> > From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017
> > 10:47 PM
> [...]
>
> > I think that the neighbor ASBR should _not_ strip the GSHUT
> > well-known community.
>
> I'm perso
On Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 02:14:19PM +, bruno.decra...@orange.com wrote:
> > From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:47 PM
>
> [...]
>
> > the place where the low local preference is set
> > should move closer to the initiator of the gshut. Instead of s
-08 address the comments received so far.
(minus the 2 technical points been discussed on 2 separate threads).
Thanks for the comments.
Regards,
Bruno
> -Original Message-
> From: I-D-Announce [mailto:i-d-announce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> internet-
> dra...@ietf.org
> Sent:
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations of the IETF.
Title : Graceful BGP session shutdown
Authors : Pierre Francois
Bruno Decraene
Hi Job ,all
> From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:47 PM
[...]
> the place where the low local preference is set
> should move closer to the initiator of the gshut. Instead of setting
> the low LP on Adj-RIB-Out to IBGP neighbors, the low LP should be
Hi Job, all
> From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net] > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017
> 10:47 PM
[...]
> I think that the neighbor ASBR should _not_ strip the GSHUT well-known
> community.
I'm personally open to both options.
Discussing this further:
- First of all, stripping the g-shut wel
Hi Jakob,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jakob Heitz (jheitz)
> Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 2:16 AM
>
> I agree with Job's proposals.
>
> In particular, the removal of the g-shut community should be carefully
> co
Hi Will,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: GROW [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Will Hargrave
> Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2017 12:46 PM
>
> On 22 Jun 2017, at 21:47, Job Snijders wrote:
>
> Hi all, a few comments below:
>
> > NEW (in Pre-configuration)
Hi Job,
Thanks for the comments.
Please see inline [Bruno]
> From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net]
> Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:47 PM
>
> Dear working group,
>
> > > BGP g-shut (possible action for Bruno et al)
> > >
> > >
> > > B
16 matches
Mail list logo
