Hi Job ,all

> From: Job Snijders [mailto:j...@ntt.net]
 > Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 10:47 PM

[...] 

> the place where the low local preference is set
 > should move closer to the initiator of the gshut.  Instead of setting
 > the low LP on Adj-RIB-Out to IBGP neighbors, the low LP should be set
 > during application of the local policy on the relevant Adj-RIB-In.

Current version of the draft changes the LOCAL_PREF on the Adj-RIB-Out and not 
on the Loc_RIB.
This has a technical benefit as otherwise, the router may (locally) select a 
backup route which it is not allowed to advertise, which would trigger the 
sending of a withdraw of the original route. i.e. not a g-shut.
This may be considered as a corner case, but I don't see why we would choose 
not cover it.
I suppose that one can also see some operational drawbacks:
a) seems less intuitive.
b) traffic received from external interfaces on this specific g-shut router 
(the egress in the AS) are forwarded on the "nominal"/g-shut path, rather than 
on the backup path.

IMO:
- "a" is not a big concern as the related configuration is pre-configured once 
for all on the router. We are not discussing the configuration applied at 
maintenance time.
- "b" has no impact on the customer loss of connectivity as this traffic may be 
locally rerouted in no time (up to zero packet loss) by the router which needs 
to update its FIB "in place". i.e. the destination IP prefix is never removed 
from the FIB. Only the outgoing interface is changed, and during this change, 
both outgoing interfaces are valid (both the old and the new).

So although some may see a tradeoff, I'd rather favor the generality of the 
mechanism. Specifically as not covering the corner cases may surprise the 
operator.

Thanks,
Regards,
--Bruno

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations 
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce 
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages 
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou 
falsifie. Merci.

This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged 
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete 
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been 
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.

_______________________________________________
GROW mailing list
GROW@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/grow

Reply via email to