You're right Bruno. I misstated it.
Still, node A will ever have no path available.
Whether Gshut initiator sends gshut or withdraws, the result is the same:
RR sends the new path to Node A.
Thanks,
Jakob.
> -Original Message-
> From: bruno.decra...@orange.com [mailto:bruno.decra...@ora
Mon, Jun 26, 2017 at 05:39:12PM +0200, Job Snijders:
> > As for my requirements, I'm considering that our ASes have the
> > knowledge of the backup path. Hence I don't need for the extra
> > coverage. Regarding the extra cost, I agree that one can hardly
> > consider this unacceptable since this is
Jakob,
> From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) [mailto:jhe...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 10:13 PM
>
> Bruno,
>
> > > If they are available to the gshut initiating router, then they
> > > are available to the other routers.
> >
> > Why?
>
> The advertising router advertised it
Bruno,
> > If they are available to the gshut initiating router, then they
> > are available to the other routers.
>
> Why?
The advertising router advertised it.
Your example is iBGP. When one speaker advertises, the whole AS receives it.
Now suppose because of some weirdness, not every speake
Jakob,
> From: Jakob Heitz (jheitz) [mailto:jhe...@cisco.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2017 7:53 AM
>
> Bruno,
>
> To my mind, the purpose of graceful shutdown is to tease out the
> hidden paths before sending the withdraw. In your cases, the
> alternative paths are not hidden. They are
