Hi All,
As I mentioned in the other thread, I think it was a mistake for Peer Up and
Initiation to share a namespace in RFC 7854. The fact that it's difficult to
get the text right in draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib demonstrates this.
My suggestion is that we separate the namespaces. I've written
Hi All,
As I mentioned in the other thread, I think it was a mistake for Peer Up and
Initiation to share a namespace in RFC 7854. The fact that it's difficult to
get the text right in draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib demonstrates this.
My suggestion is that we separate the namespaces. I've written
Hi All,
I apologize for the late reply to the WGLC. I have a couple of comments I'd
like to raise. I'll start by saying that although I'm going to bring up a
couple problems with draft-ietf-grow-bmp-local-rib, I think at least the second
was inherent in RFC 7854, and I will start a different ma
