Re: [GROW] BMP server implementation

rom Stephen here: > > https://code.google.com/p/bmpreceiver/source/browse/#svn%2Ftags%2Frelease-1.1 > > Best regards, > R. > > > On Thu, Aug 7, 2014 at 9:35 AM, Shishio Tsuchiya wrote: >> F.Y.I >> Ishida-san who is NTT R&D announced Ryu has implem

[GROW] BMP server implementation

F.Y.I Ishida-san who is NTT R&D announced Ryu has implemented BMPv3 on JANOG ml . https://github.com/osrg/ryu It supports BMPv3 and we confirmed interoperability with Cisco ASR1000 and Juniper MX960. Regards, -Shishio ___ GROW mailing list GROW@ietf.

Re: [GROW] last call for draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations

Support! Regards, -Shishio (2014/03/19 22:12), p...@lugs.com wrote: > Hello all, > > This is the last call for the draft-ietf-grow-ix-bgp-route-server-operations. > This document has been discussed at multiple meetings, and on the mailing > list. > > Although this is last call, we ask for tho

Re: [GROW] Wake up two sleeping VA drafts?//: Last Call comments on draft-ietf-l3vpn-virtual-hub

I like and support "draft-ietf-grow-va". I think "draft-ietf-grow-va" would be one of useful design document/technic for FIB suppression. Regards, -Shishio (2012/11/09 11:27), Ronald Bonica wrote: How do folks on the list feel? Ron -Original Message- From

Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-private-ip-sp-cores

(2012/06/08 23:06), t.petch wrote: > I would like to see this published as an RFC. +1 I support publishing. Regards, -Shishio > > The only discussion I see whether or not the title of 12.2 should have > an initial capital - I think that it should. > > Tom Petch > > - Original Message ---

Re: [GROW] WGLC: draft-ietf-grow-simple-va

Support. Regards, -Shishio (2012/05/15 1:51), Christopher Morrow wrote: > Helo wg folk, > Since we (I really I think) messed up the last WGLC for this document, > can we get another attempt at this now? > > > Abstract: >

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-simple-va

Ron and Grow WG I posted to janog/apops to get comments of this draft. I'm not sure why operator does not express his thought to this draft, but I believe this draft is very important for operators especially in APAC/JAPAN. I'm always participant to Japanese operators community meeting, and often

Re: [GROW] draft-ietf-grow-simple-va

Ron I and my colleague did presentation to the operators group. APRICOT2012 http://www.apricot2012.net/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/45523/07-Shishio-Tsuchiya-Simple-Virtual-Aggregation.pdf JANOG27(Japanese) http://www.janog.gr.jp/meeting/janog27/doc/janog27-fib-pub-rev00.pdf We received positive

Re: [GROW] WG Adoption Call for: draft-kirkham-private-ip-sp-cores

support! (2011/11/17 15:30), Christopher Morrow wrote: > Folks, > As mentioned in the WG meeting today, please take the time to > read/review/think-about the subject draft: > > > Anthony et-al have done some good work documenting

Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption -draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-01

o > > Thanks, > > Wes George > > > > -Original Message- > From: grow-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:grow-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of > Christopher Morrow > Sent: Monday, June 27, 2011 4:42 PM > To: Shishio Tsuchiya > Cc: draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implem

Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-01

Chairs and All We have published latest version. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-shishio-grow-isp-rfd-implement-survey-02 We could get 63 response from global operator groups. If you have any comments,I really appreciate it. (2011/04/01 16:55), Christopher Morrow wrote: > Given the discussion in

Re: [GROW] Call for WG Adoption - draft-shakir-idr-ops-reqs-for-bgp-error-handling

+1 Support (2011/04/01 17:19), Christopher Morrow wrote: > (+wg this time, for realz) > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Christopher Morrow > wrote: >> Given the discussion in the room today, and the overlap of >> readers-of-draft + folk-asking-for-adoption a call to the list is >> appropriate