On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 09:03:04AM -0800, john heasley wrote:
Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 04:35:09PM +, Jeffrey Haas:
SNMP is *not* a good tool for monitoring routing
state. It's fine for monitoring peer counters and monitoring specific
prefixes using standard polling techniques.
Please
On Dec 15, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Nick Hilliard wrote:
1. please encode 1970-epoch timestamps as 64 bits, not 32. 32 bits will
break before I retire.
This is not out of the question, but keeping in mind that there's already
implementation of the currently specified format, what is the value of
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Robert Raszuk ras...@cisco.com wrote:
John at all,
Title : BGP Monitoring Protocol
Author(s) : J. Scudder, et al.
Filename : draft-ietf-grow-bmp-05.txt
Pages : 16
Date :
Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:27:54PM -0800, John Scudder:
On Dec 16, 2010, at 8:08 PM, Stephen Stuart wrote:
I think it defeats a lot of use cases. Perhaps this subtle difference
should
be discussed more before we proceed any further with this document.
This was discussed before, if I
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Global Routing Operations Working Group of the
IETF.
Title : BGP Monitoring Protocol
Author(s) : J. Scudder, et al.
Filename:
