Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-14 Thread Yoshinori K. Okuji
On Thursday 14 July 2005 02:43, Hollis Blanchard wrote: > On Jul 13, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: > > Marco Gerards wrote: > >> For which reason? > >> > >> But if it should be more precise, it should be a grub_uint64_t. > > > > If the architecture give us a 32 bit number, we won't inv

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Jul 13, 2005, at 5:15 PM, Vincent Pelletier wrote: Marco Gerards wrote: For which reason? But if it should be more precise, it should be a grub_uint64_t. If the architecture give us a 32 bit number, we won't invent the remaining 32 bits... We don't invent them; they are 0. -Hollis _

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marco Gerards wrote: > For which reason? > > But if it should be more precise, it should be a grub_uint64_t. If the architecture give us a 32 bit number, we won't invent the remaining 32 bits... On the other hand, if the architecture give us 64 signi

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Marco Gerards
Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marco Gerards wrote: >> This change is not required. We can better leave it as it was. > > So you'll have not to apply a part of the first patch in this thread, > because this one fixes an error in grub emu because I changed a > prototype in the fir

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marco Gerards wrote: > Thanks a lot for your porting work, you are doing a great job! You > definitely set the world record GRUB porting. :) I would have been much slower without the whole working ppc port, as I had all the functions I needed. And it

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Marco Gerards wrote: > This change is not required. We can better leave it as it was. So you'll have not to apply a part of the first patch in this thread, because this one fixes an error in grub emu because I changed a prototype in the first patch.

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Marco Gerards
Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Vincent, Thanks a lot for your porting work, you are doing a great job! You definitely set the world record GRUB porting. :) Here are some comments on the patch. This patch can be applied after Hollis' patch, which will require some changes in y

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Marco Gerards
Vincent Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hi Vincent, > Something I forgot in previous patch : prototype change for grub_get_rtc > in utils/misc.c . This change is not required. We can better leave it as it was. Thanks, Marco ___ Grub-devel ma

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Something I forgot in previous patch : prototype change for grub_get_rtc in utils/misc.c . Vincent Pelletier -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1NcTFEQoKRQyjtURAlWWAKC0HdHIZCfNqjbl2j685m2hI8o5XwCgnI1Y /qedbKjsWGY6

Re: [PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-13 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vincent Pelletier wrote: One more sparc64 specific file. Now that the configure file has been updated on the server, the changes are more visible. Vincent Pelletier -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1MQcFEQoKRQyj

[PATCH] sparc64 (common & specific files)

2005-07-12 Thread Vincent Pelletier
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A patch contains some changes I made to common files, the second changes needed specifically by the sparc64 port. Vincent Pelletier -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFC1BKaFEQoKRQyjtURAhNGAJ4le+g5fztpZmSKRowi0GoyiU