On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:51 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > I think strncpy() is one of the few that needs an utf8 equivalent,
> > because a char may span several bytes.
>
> Well, he didn't say exactly what semantics he wanted his
> g_utf8_strncpy() and g_utf16_strncpy() to have. In the UTF-8 case
Hi Tor,
On Thu, 2009-01-29 at 16:37 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> > What is wrong with:
> > gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
>
> It isn't needed. The nice thing about UTF-8 is that strings in UTF-8
> can be handled with normal C str* functions just fine.
I think st
