(was Re: Gtk 3.0)
CC: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
We must atract more scientifc/engineering applications for Linux and
GTK, because this is exactly the kind of stuff that enterprises and
universities are demanding
Dear Emmanuele,
yes. and that, apart from games and scientific/technical applications, it's not
at all common.
the amount of code using OpenGL is relatively limited (hence niche) compared
to the rest of applications in the GNOME stack (or even in the whole Linux ecosystem);
it's *usage*
On Sat, Dec 05, 2009 at 04:22:36PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
We must atract more scientifc/engineering applications for Linux and
GTK, because this is exactly the kind of stuff that enterprises and
universities are demanding.
If we have fantastic operating systems and desktop
Thanks Javier,
it's good to know that EmmanueleBassi
http://live.gnome.org/EmmanueleBassi is now taking care of GtkGLExt
integration with GTK...
Regards,
Carlos
Hello Carlos,
2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
That's why I asked in the first message of this thread,
(Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely
formatted; I apologize)
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea; 2) cairo should get GPU acceleration for 2D
Hi Emmanuele,
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be integrated with GTK+ that's fine
for me.
2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
2) GtkGlExt is good enough for GTK-2.0, I never had a single problem
module.
EMAILING FOR THE GREATER GOOD
Join me
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 22:26:05 +0100
From: y...@physics.muni.cz
To: eba...@gmail.com; jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt
Subject: Re: GtkGLExt (was Re: Gtk 3.0)
CC: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:51 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
Hi Emmanuele,
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be integrated with GTK+
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 22:26 +0100, David Nečas wrote:
On Fri, Dec 04, 2009 at 08:51:54PM +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
2) GtkGlExt
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 20:51 +, Carlos Pereira wrote:
Hi Emmanuele,
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it into gtk+ it's not a
good idea;
1) If you think GtkGlExt should not be
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly,
because I keep saying the same things. :-)
I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend
that being able to drop into GL directly is a
2009/12/4 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
3) However GtkGlExt is not GTK-3.0 ready, because it cannot be compiled with
SEAL_ENABLE and SINGLE_INCLUDES...
Bug and patch filled upstream for SINGLE_INCLUDES issue: [1]
Also, I've found some interesting threads about this topic here
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
(Sorry, I'm sending this via my phone so it's not going to be nicely
formatted; I apologize)
I'm really not working on it - mainly for three reasons: 1) if you want to
use GL, GtkGlExt is good enough and integrating it
On 12/05/2009 12:28 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 -0500, Braden McDaniel wrote:
I have the impression that my message is not coming through correctly,
because I keep saying the same things. :-)
I never said that raw OperGL is not used, or not useful; I just contend
Hello Carlos,
2009/12/3 Carlos Pereira jose.carlos.pere...@ist.utl.pt:
That's why I asked in the first message of this thread, what are the plans
regarding GtkGLExt. To the best of my knowledge, GtkGLExt is still the
official way to bridge GTK and OpenGL:
http://gtkglext.sourceforge.net/
16 matches
Mail list logo
