Some of my thoughts on the matter:
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 10:10:42AM -0600, Thomas Stover wrote:
...
-QT (last time I checked) is not even C++. It's C++ and a custom macro
language. building ouch. debugging ouch. C++ paradigm ouch.
The Qt macros aren't very intrusive.
Once you have your
jvette...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
I find that deriving classes in C++ is alot easier than going through
the GObject type system.
Yes this is true, in C. GTKmm makes things rather nice if you work in
C++. In fact I kind of like how GTKmm works without a preprocessor,
with type-safe
With the recent news that Nokia will be releasing QT under LGPL, I'm
seeing allot of knee-jerk anti-GTK comments out there. I know I'm
preaching to the choir on this list, but for the sake of moral I thought
I would post my 2 cents on the matter.
-I can't think of single QT application I even
Message-
From: gtk-app-devel-list-boun...@gnome.org on behalf of Thomas Stover
Sent: Wed 14-Jan-09 16:10
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Subject: qt vs gtk
With the recent news that Nokia will be releasing QT under LGPL, I'm
seeing allot of knee-jerk anti-GTK comments out there. I know I'm
that PolicyKit is hitting mainstream. This means root access
simply isn't needed anymore for almost all desktop-originated actions.
Now of course this is all off-topic since we're talking about qt vs
gtk not gnome or even KDE.
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
interesting issues, but
it is certainly possible. (See my other post on problems parsing rc files.)
From: Andersen, Jan jander...@informatica.com
To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:22:47 PM
Subject: RE: qt vs gtk
As someone who has
On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 6:05 PM, Jack ostrof...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
I believe the original question was gkt+ vs qt.
I don't believe there was a question
And this is all fairly offtopic for this list.
So lets stop it now before it gets silly.
iain
___
