On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:38 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
> scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
I disagree. All you have to do is drag the scroll bar to see exactly
how fast and smooth, pixel-per-pixel scrolling can be.
>
>
On mar, 2007-03-27 at 15:48 -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 21:38 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> > After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
> > scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
>
> I disagree. All you have to do is drag the scroll bar to see
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:27 -0400, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) wrote:
> On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to do this:
> >
> > - Get the latest GTK+ from svn trunk.
> >
> > - Go through each of the unreviewed patches and class
On 3/16/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The directory 'trunk/debian' in svn is nearly 10 years old and I
> wonder who still uses it. Shouldn't it get removed?
anyone out there?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@
> Nicolas, can you get another profile using Markku's patch?
Most certainly!
A couple of preliminary remarks.
I have observed a startup time increase of between 20% and 30%.
When scrolling, here is what I observed:
- when displaying the selected row, performance is as bad as
before (scro
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
> messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
No, it definitely allows suppressions for leaked memory, via a
Memcheck:Leak suppression entry. I've included a
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the text editor
CygnusED, which had a very smooth scrolling, vblank-syn
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
> > The directory 'trunk/debian' in svn is nearly 10 years old and I
> > wonder who still uses it. Shouldn't it get removed?
> anyone out there?
It's a piece of history! 17 Nov 1998! Standards-Version: 2.4.0.0!
"This is the unstable 1.1 branch
So bugzilla is again available to me. Any tips on where to file this bug?
Jake Goulding wrote:
> As soon as we get a bug for this (I don't seem
> to be able to access bugzilla.gnome.org right now...) I'll post the
> patch and let you take a look at it.
--
JAKE GOULDING
Software Engineer
[EMA
2007/3/27, Nicolas Setton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> > Nicolas, can you get another profile using Markku's patch?
>
> Most certainly!
>
> A couple of preliminary remarks.
>
> I have observed a startup time increase of between 20% and 30%.
>
> When scrolling, here is what I observed:
>- when dis
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:54 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> > A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> > this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
>
> I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the t
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to do this:
>
> - Get the latest GTK+ from svn trunk.
>
> - Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
> informally:
>
> - obsolete patch which does not apply "a
> What's your Cairo version?
My tests were done with the 1.4.2 release.
> The input focus rectangle has been
> identified as a performance problem some time ago:
>
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/2006-October/008135.html
> "Another thing we identified at GUADEC is that the dashed st
Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 09:00 -0600, Michael L Torrie a écrit :
> Smooth scrolling is only good if it is very fast (as fast as without
> smooth scrolling) and totally synchronized with both the redraw and the
> mouse wheel's speed, in order to eliminate tearing and stuttering. I
> think we're fina
I don't really understand the old (nor the IE5 implementation), but I'd
imagine the best way to do it would involve keeping the current scroll
values and just having something constantly adjust the position of the
scrolled canvas to follow certain rules.
I'd say, 250ms is probably reasonable - so
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103811
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing li
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:50:08 +0200, Nicolas Setton wrote:
> Interesting, the dashed stroke is exactly what's causing problems -
> thanks for the pointer!
Ah, ...
> > though I *think* it has been adressed since. But if you are running
> > 1.4, that would hint that it still is a problem.
>
> There
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 06:46 -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
> > messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
> No, it definitely allows suppressions for leaked
Le mardi 27 mars 2007 à 18:43 +0100, Alex Jones a écrit :
> I don't really understand the old (nor the IE5 implementation), but
> I'd
> imagine the best way to do it would involve keeping the current scroll
> values and just having something constantly adjust the position of the
> scrolled canvas t
Alexander Larsson wrote:
> Do many apps really require creating launchers
> from arbitrary desktop files? What is the typical usecase of that?
Well, the panel in multiple places (main menu, panel launchers, run
dialog). The various panel add-ons/replacements (the Novell main menu
and app launcher,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 15:54 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> > A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> > this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
> I dunno, but it's more than sweet. Whoever remember the te
Hello,
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 07:37 +0100, Alex Jones wrote:
> A few years ago there used to be a distributor patch in Gentoo to enable
> this, and it was sweet. What happened, here?
As far I know, the patch isn't yet clean enough for upstream integration
and work back then (gtk2.6 times) on it di
> After playing with Gedit a bit I think GTK+ isn't up to the task of
> scrolling fast enough to achieve that.
Well, it's always going to depend on machine power. We don't have to
worry about it until we consider making it default.
Optimisation can come later, at least while it's non-default.
As
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007 at 06:46:19AM -0700, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:19:22 -0600, Hans Petter Jansson wrote:
> > Also, the last time I checked, valgrind would only let you suppress
> > messages about invalid accesses, not leaked memory.
>
> No, it definitely allows suppressions for
24 matches
Mail list logo