Hello,
I have an application from which I would like to extract the content of
a gtk_frame in order to print it (and perhaps to preview it). This
gtk_frame is attached to a gtk_table which is atatched itself to a
gtk_window (so I can place this frame in the window).
Up to now, I launch a pthre
Hi,
this list is about development of GTK+, not about using GTK+ to develop
applications. Please ask your question on gtk-list. Thanks.
Sven
PS: Have a look at gdk_pixbuf_get_from_drawable().
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
h
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:57 -0700, Jason Hickey wrote:
> I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
> OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
>
> Am I missing something, or is it not possible to deal with closures
> in GtkActionEntry?
GtkActionEnt
On May 27, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> in this particular case, the data passed to the callback is the one
> you
> pass to gtk_action_group_add_actions():
>
> void gtk_action_group_add_actions (GtkActionGroup
> *action_group,
> const
On 3/15/07, Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to do this:
>
> - Get the latest GTK+ from svn trunk.
>
> - Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
> informally:
>
> - obsolete patch which does not apply "
Philip Withnall writes:
> I've now got a list of patches which could be applied to GTK+ which are
> currently just sitting in Bugzilla for GtkTreeView and GtkIconView.
> Should I put a comment in each bug report, or send the list to someone
> or what?
You should either review the patches *unde
Yeah, that was me. I've since stopped, and I'm talking with Tor
Lindqvist about how I could be more useful. He's suggesting I go through
the list of unloved patches and review them, which sounds fair enough.
Philip
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 12:39 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On 3/15/07, Federico M
On Sun, 27 May 2007, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Philip Withnall writes:
> > I've now got a list of patches which could be applied to GTK+ which are
> > currently just sitting in Bugzilla for GtkTreeView and GtkIconView.
> > Should I put a comment in each bug report, or send the list to someone
> > or
