Re: glib on Symbian

2008-09-08 Thread Biswajeet . Dash
>Kalle Vahlman wrote :- >>Wrong. Symbian does not support static data in DLL:s in all versions out there: Please refer to the following link for the updated latest version of the document :- http://developer.symbian.com/main/downloads/papers/static_data/SupportForWriteableStaticDataInDLLs.pdf

[REMINDER] GTK+ Team Meeting - September 9th

2008-09-08 Thread Matthias Clasen
hi everyone; this is the usual reminder for the IRC GTK+ Team Meeting. the meeting will be held in the #gtk-devel channel on irc.gnome.org, at 20:00 UTC[1]. things I'd like to discuss are o branching o filechooser threading issues (bug 551337) o 2.90/3.0 plan, next steps o cube.gtk.org avail

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Johan Dahlin
Murray Cumming wrote: On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 10:09 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote: On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:39 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: Paul Pogonyshev wrote: Johan Dahlin wrote: [...] > I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer". typedef enum { GI_OWNERSHI

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 12:07 PM, Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If either attribute is unspecified, it's assumed to be false. > Kind of a detail, but with the scanner setup in g-i, I think it would be good to require manual specification of ownership for all allocated types. Othe

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Mike Kestner
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 17:28 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > In GAPI, we have two ownership attributes on list elements: owned and > > elements_owned. > > or nothing is owned. Yes, we have these 3 in gtkmm too. Johan's system > offers a fourth combination, list-not-owned, element-owned, so-far no

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2008-09-08 at 10:09 -0500, Mike Kestner wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:39 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: > > Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > > > Johan Dahlin wrote: > > >> [...] > > >> > > > > I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of > > > "transfer". > > >> typedef enum

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Mike Kestner
On Sun, 2008-09-07 at 17:39 +0200, Johan Dahlin wrote: > Paul Pogonyshev wrote: > > Johan Dahlin wrote: > >> [...] > >> > > > I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of > > "transfer". > >> typedef enum { > >>GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it

GObject Introspection included in the Softpedia Linux software database

2008-09-08 Thread Softpedia Editorial Team
Congratulations, GObject Introspection, one of your products, has been added to Softpedia's database of software programs for Linux. It is featured with a description text, screenshots, download links and technical details on this page: http://linux.softpedia.com/get/Desktop-Environment/Gnome/GOb

Re: GObject-Introspection 0.5.0

2008-09-08 Thread Paolo Bonzini
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: > 2008/9/7 Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I'm leaning towards using the "ownership" terminology instead of "transfer". typedef enum { GI_OWNERSHIP_CALLER, /* caller owns it, caller should free it after use */ GI_OWNERSHIP_CA