On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 09:51:32AM +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 18:27 -0800, C.J. Adams-Collier wrote:
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I'm having a problem building gtk from Alex's branch. Am I doing
> > something wrong? I had jhbuild take care of building the deps and got
> > a
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 3:32 PM, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Emmanuele Bassi
>
> Sorry I missed the last meeting, is there anything you need me
> to do for GtkActivatables ?
I don't think so. I did another round of fixes to make PolicyKit-gnome
work. Now waiting f
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:30 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
[...]
> + GTK+ 2.16 status (mclasen)
> - new API has been merged
> - still missing: GtkActivatable (may be ready for next week)
Sorry I missed the last meeting, is there anything you need me
to do for GtkActivatables ?
Cheers,
Heya,
I'm one of the WebKitGtk fellows and one thing we are missing currently
is a place on the web, where you can find releases, docs and whatnot.
So we had the idea, "webkit.gtk.org" would be a good domain.
We would also like to use a similar design and layout, of course with
different colours
2009/2/19 Mathias Hasselmann :
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 01:54 + schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
>> I plan to work on some other mockups of the website for other sections
>> and I would like to get feedback from you guys.
>
> Awesome mockup! Let's get it in place!
Also, my HTML/CSS-fu is quite lame
2009/2/19 Murray Cumming :
> On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
>> Well, first I want to come up with some screencasts of Gtkmm/pygtk
>
> That would be great. I suggest that you get us to approve a script first
> though, otherwise there's sure to be some little inaccuracy that I
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 14:00 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
> Well, first I want to come up with some screencasts of Gtkmm/pygtk
That would be great. I suggest that you get us to approve a script first
though, otherwise there's sure to be some little inaccuracy that I find
annoying but which would be v
On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 16:56 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 10:33 -0500 schrieb Dominic Lachowicz:
> > That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in
> > large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns
> > into HTML. Any pro
A way to overcome that, would be to put a warning on the wiki page
whenever the documentation for a function is updated, so that the
users could see the updated comment in the code and update the
documentation accordingly.
P.S. Sorry for sending the message twice
2009/2/19 Dominic Lachowicz :
>
Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 17:52 +0200 schrieb Eugene Gorodinsky:
> Have there been cases where documentation for some function was
> changed after that function appeared in the stable version?
Yes, this happens frequently: Spelling errors, explanations of
limitations, code examples, usage sce
Am Donnerstag, den 19.02.2009, 10:33 -0500 schrieb Dominic Lachowicz:
> That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in
> large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns
> into HTML. Any proposal would require a way to keep the Wiki and the C
> comments in-sy
Yes. The most common example I can think of is when a function is deprecated.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
wrote:
> Have there been cases where documentation for some function was
> changed after that function appeared in the stable version?
>
> 2009/2/19 Dominic Lachowicz
Have there been cases where documentation for some function was
changed after that function appeared in the stable version?
2009/2/19 Dominic Lachowicz :
> That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in
> large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns
> in
That's hard-ish to do today. GTK+'s documentation is generated in
large part by scanning comments in C code, which a program then turns
into HTML. Any proposal would require a way to keep the Wiki and the C
comments in-sync.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
wrote:
> Hi all
>
>
Hi all
Since you guys are discussing the redesign of the gtk+ website, I'd
like to propose an idea that I have. I've seen quite a lot of comments
saying gtk+ documentation isn't as good as qt's. What do you think of
having a wiki that documents all of gtk+ api?
2009/2/19 Mathias Hasselmann :
> Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 01:54 + schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
>> I plan to work on some other mockups of the website for other sections
>> and I would like to get feedback from you guys.
>
> Awesome mockup! Let's get it in place!
Well, first I want to come up with
2009/2/19 Luc Pionchon :
> 2009/2/18 Alberto Ruiz :
>
>> The idea es that Gtk+ is actually something that enables really cool
>> things, but we don't empower that idea from the website.
>> The other point is that bindings seems like second class citizens
>> whereas it's actually quite the opposite.
Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 01:54 + schrieb Alberto Ruiz:
> I plan to work on some other mockups of the website for other sections
> and I would like to get feedback from you guys.
Awesome mockup! Let's get it in place!
Ciao,
Mathias
--
Mathias Hasselmann
Personal Blog: http://taschenorake
2009/2/18 Alberto Ruiz :
> The idea es that Gtk+ is actually something that enables really cool
> things, but we don't empower that idea from the website.
> The other point is that bindings seems like second class citizens
> whereas it's actually quite the opposite. I think that a lot of the
> con
19 matches
Mail list logo
