Hi:
I have a situation where I need to verify data before allowing a row change in
a GtkTreeView. Essentially:
1. User requests a row change through a keyboard or a mouse;
2. Check if data in the current row has been edited without be saved, or even
is complete
and valid, and prompt the user
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 12:38 AM, Lance Zhang zhan...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hi:
I have a situation where I need to verify data before allowing a row change
in a GtkTreeView. Essentially:
1. User requests a row change through a keyboard or a mouse;
2. Check if data in the current row has been
Thank you, Tristan!
Handle edited signal will not help in my situation. Basically one cannot
validate user input in that event.
Say, there are 3 columns, a user entry some perfectly valid data in the first
column, but the whole record is
still incomplete. If at this point the user
On Thu, 2011-02-24 at 17:55 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Morten Welinder mort...@gnome.org wrote:
What actual problem was solved by all this infrastructure to keep just
one instance?
Basically for any application which manipulates private files in any
I'm trying to build the latest version of gobject-introspection. I've
got it with git.
It's complaining there is no gnome-autogen found. Well that's right,
but do I have to install these first It should be optional.
Stef
___
gtk-devel-list mailing
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:43:02PM +0100, Stef Bon wrote:
I'm trying to build the latest version of gobject-introspection. I've
got it with git.
It's complaining there is no gnome-autogen found. Well that's right,
but do I have to install these first It should be optional.
Use a tarball
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 17:43 +0100, Stef Bon wrote:
I'm trying to build the latest version of gobject-introspection. I've
got it with git.
It's complaining there is no gnome-autogen found. Well that's right,
but do I have to install these first It should be optional.
That's normal when
= GTK+ Team Meeting - 2011-03-08 =
• 3.2 planning
- 6 months cycle
- branch master soon
- 3.2 bugs tagged in bugzilla
ACTION: everyone should go over the list
• 3.0.2
- tristan's size-request caching/performance work
- new enumeration value + new vfunc
- reasonable to backport
-
Commit 52ef73ac8c40ea2a8ca80cf96d52a836bcaf76c2 breaks vmware 7.1.3
VMware hangs on startup. Nothing displayed. Reverting the commit solves
the problem. Sorry, I couldn't find any logs in vmware.
Thanks,
Jeff
commit 52ef73ac8c40ea2a8ca80cf96d52a836bcaf76c2
Author: Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 7:17 PM, Jeff Chua jeff.chua.li...@gmail.com wrote:
Commit 52ef73ac8c40ea2a8ca80cf96d52a836bcaf76c2 breaks vmware 7.1.3
VMware hangs on startup. Nothing displayed. Reverting the commit solves the
problem. Sorry, I couldn't find any logs in vmware.
Thanks,
Jeff
Hi Jeff,
It's possible our logging code hasn't been reached at this point, but if you
run vmware from the command line, it would normally tell you the path to the
UI log file. Having that would be awesome, if it does show it.
I'm looking through this commit and trying to figure out why we break.
Jeff, would you mind temporarily commenting out the last conditional
involving G_OPTION_ARG_CALLBACK and see if things work again? If not, it
would help me to know which of the conditionals is breaking us, so going
through and testing each would be awesome. I suspect it's the last check,
though.
Okay, just to keep people in the loop.
We are indeed doing a couple stupid things with flags. Why it's breaking us,
I don't know yet (hard to say whether it's specific to a certain version of
our product, or if it's the fact that I had to just backport this patch to
test, or that I'm in a devel
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:06 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
I would very much like some reasoning to point people at when I tell
them to use GtkApplication. I will not just hand-wave and say that
people say it's good.
GtkApplication is the GNOME 3.0 replacement for LibUnique, right? If so,
then
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-03-08 at 12:06 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
I would very much like some reasoning to point people at when I tell
them to use GtkApplication. I will not just hand-wave and say that
people say it's
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 9:10 AM, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote:
Okay, just to keep people in the loop.
We are indeed doing a couple stupid things with flags. Why it's breaking us,
I don't know yet (hard to say whether it's specific to a certain version of
our product, or if it's
16 matches
Mail list logo
