GdkPixmap as X11 Pixmap?

2011-06-07 Thread Ingo Brückl
I'm trying to get an X11 Pixmap from a GDK rendering function as follows (my_pixbuf has been created by gdk-pixbuf-csource): GdkPixmap *gdkIcon; GdkBitmap *gdkIconMask; Pixmap Icon; Pixmap IconMask; gtk_init(argc, argv); gdk_pixbuf_render_pixmap_and_mask_for_colormap (

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Shawn Amundson
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 04/06/11 18:11, Devin Samarin wrote: Everyone, It looks like all the committed changes are being updated fine. Except the changes on the features page were editing code that was not visible. They were editing the

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 11:17 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote: I don't think we can treat that as a first step and hold off on doing any other fixes until that migration is done.  The migration is a significant undertaking, and will not be finished for 3.2. Sorry, I didn't want to say

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Martyn Russell
On 07/06/11 12:44, Shawn Amundson wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com mailto:mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 04/06/11 18:11, Devin Samarin wrote: Everyone, It looks like all the committed changes are being updated fine. Except

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On 2011-06-07 at 14:48, Martyn Russell wrote: Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable the json apache module if possible. Ideally, shouldn't we move gtk.org under the Gnome infrastructure instead? at least it would be under the scope of the Gnome sysadmin team and

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On 2011-06-07 at 09:46, Matthias Clasen wrote: I don't think we can treat that as a first step and hold off on doing any other fixes until that migration is done.  The migration is a significant undertaking, and will not be finished for 3.2. Sorry, I didn't want to say that we should

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Piñeiro
On 06/07/2011 03:46 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: So, I've discussed the best way forward for this with Benjamin today. Here is a rough 6-step plan for dealing with the 'gail problem': 0) write tests for accessible implementations 1) move modules/other/gail nach gtk/a11y 2) add tons of private

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: 0) write tests for accessible implementations 1) move modules/other/gail nach gtk/a11y 2) add tons of private headers for private structs, to share things 3) remove now unnecessary code 4) add a11y features support to

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Piñeiro
On 06/07/2011 05:06 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: 5) figure out new interfaces for GTK to expose necessary features to a11y (and other consumers, such as IM and OSK) we should probably establish some common interfaces so that Clutter can expose the same functionality for its own items — and so

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote: 4) Is also an awesome plan (proper shared libgailutil replacement). A very quick-and-dirty sketch of this can be found in the drop-gail branch:

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Piñeiro
On 06/07/2011 05:11 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuele Bassieba...@gmail.com wrote: 0) write tests for accessible implementations 1) move modules/other/gail nach gtk/a11y 2) add tons of private headers for private structs, to share things 3) remove now

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Martyn Russell
On 07/06/11 16:02, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On 2011-06-07 at 14:48, Martyn Russell wrote: Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable the json apache module if possible. Ideally, shouldn't we move gtk.org under the Gnome infrastructure instead? at least it would be

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On 2011-06-07 at 17:16, Piñeiro wrote: On 06/07/2011 05:11 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 11:06 AM, Emmanuele Bassieba...@gmail.com wrote: 0) write tests for accessible implementations 1) move modules/other/gail nach gtk/a11y 2) add tons of private headers for private

Re: Gail next steps (was Re: GTK and ATK)

2011-06-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On 2011-06-07 at 17:13, Piñeiro wrote: On 06/07/2011 05:06 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: 5) figure out new interfaces for GTK to expose necessary features to a11y (and other consumers, such as IM and OSK) we should probably establish some common interfaces so that Clutter can expose the same

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Devin Samarin
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: Hi Shawn, For now, we're using a temporary solution for gtk.org and the twitter/identica script which Devin provided. Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable the json apache module if

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Shawn Amundson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 8:48 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 07/06/11 12:44, Shawn Amundson wrote: On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com mailto:mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 04/06/11 18:11, Devin Samarin wrote: Everyone, It looks

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Shawn Amundson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote: On 2011-06-07 at 14:48, Martyn Russell wrote: Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable the json apache module if possible. Ideally, shouldn't we move gtk.org under the Gnome infrastructure

Re: www.gtk.org now updated but no news!

2011-06-07 Thread Shawn Amundson
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:49 AM, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote: On 07/06/11 16:02, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: On 2011-06-07 at 14:48, Martyn Russell wrote: Ideally, we would upgrade the server's php version to 5.2 and enable the json apache module if possible. Ideally, shouldn't we