On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
wrote:
> On 17/07/2012 16:43, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
>> wrote:
>>> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
>>> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projec
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 01:34 +0300, Guetcho Guetchev wrote:
> So the question is: how am I suppose to build Glib on unix-compilant system
> (iOS is such thing) without installing gtk-doc and Gnome?
This just came up in the other thread, but:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674314
_
Hmm...
1. Copy gtk-doc.m4 from gtk-doc to wherever you've installed automake
2. run autoreconf/autogen.sh in glib directory
3. run ./configure in glib directory with --disable-gtk-doc
--
Lionel Landwerlin
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 02:40 +0300, Guetcho Guetchev wrote:
> Good point!
> However … how
Now that I was able to build all the components up to and including gtk3,
I tried starting over so I could clean up my notes to be sure that I got
the notes right. I noticed that glib-2.32.4 had been released since I
started this with glib-2.32.2. I thought I would try it but found that
make fai
Good point!
However … how to get to the configure script? :)
This is not a release tarball I am using but a git clone.There is no configure
script.
GG
On Jul 18, 2012, at 2:18 AM, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 15:49 -0700, Hubert Figuière wrote:
>> On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Hubert Figuière wrote:
> On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> > it can be very hard. there are two approaches. one is to build a
> > pseudo/fake gtk-doc package for OS X, which does actually exist, but i
> > can't tell you where to find it. google will help. t
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 15:49 -0700, Hubert Figuière wrote:
> On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> > it can be very hard. there are two approaches. one is to build a
> > pseudo/fake gtk-doc package for OS X, which does actually exist, but i
> > can't tell you where to find it. google will help.
On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
> it can be very hard. there are two approaches. one is to build a
> pseudo/fake gtk-doc package for OS X, which does actually exist, but i
> can't tell you where to find it. google will help. the other is to install
> ALL the dependencies that gtk-doc requir
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Guetcho Guetchev
wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I am trying to build Glib for iOS. I have set up everything - the cross
> compiler, the toolchain, etc. The build process takes place on Mac OS 10.7.4
> I am able to build Glib from the release tarball. However when I clone t
On Fri, 2012-07-13 at 09:20 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
> Is anyone any closer to having a Windows installer for GTK+ 3 ready?
>
You might want to check out
http://blogs.gnome.org/xjuan/2012/05/29/cross-compiling-glade-for-win32/
There is a fedora project that cross compile Gtk and lots of othe
Hello guys,
I am trying to build Glib for iOS. I have set up everything - the cross
compiler, the toolchain, etc. The build process takes place on Mac OS 10.7.4
I am able to build Glib from the release tarball. However when I clone the git
repository I do not see the configure script. Even at the
On 17/07/2012 14:23, John Stowers wrote:
Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
from time to time... For now at least, once stable it'll go to
ftp.gnome.org :)
aside #1:
Did you/anyone check out
On 17/07/2012 13:14, Damon Register wrote:
On 7/16/2012 3:25 PM, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
Thanks. I downloaded last night. I hope you don't mind me asking
but I guess I don't totally understand what I read at the site.
Is this a
On 17/07/2012 16:43, Thomas H.P. Andersen wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
> wrote:
>> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
>> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
>> from time to time... For now at least,
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:14:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
>>
>> Yes, I just want the built libraries and bits, ideally put in the right
>> place automatically. I don't have the time or enthusiasm to build
>> everything on Windows myself.
>
> Yup, that's the bundle (a first step towards a proper sdk), which
> I'm uploading to http://optionexplicit.be/projects/gnome-windows/GTK+3/
> from time to time... For now at least, once stable it'll go to
> ftp.gnome.org :)
aside #1:
Did you/anyone check out the jhbuild-like build system the
On 7/16/2012 1:29 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
It's just for the introspection.m4 file; you should be able to copy it
into the m4/ directory in the GTK+ source.
That worked. As I mentioned yesterday, I was able to build gtk3. Today
I tried the gtk3 examples at
http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/3.0/g
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 13:14:08 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
Yes, I just want the built libraries and bits, ideally put in the
right
place automatically. I don't have the time or enthusiasm to build
everything on Windows myself. I can just about bear to build my
application on Windows if GTK+ is av
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 07:56 +0200, Stef Walter wrote:
> On 07/16/2012 09:40 PM, Damon Register wrote:
> > It's just for the introspection.m4 file; you should be able to copy it
> > into the m4/ directory in the GTK+ source.
>
> In general, should we be copying introspection.m4 into our projects?
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 12:30:11 +0200, John Stowers wrote:
There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
(due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
But then I saw
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/win
On 7/16/2012 3:25 PM, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
(due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
Thanks. I downloaded last night. I hope you don't mind me ask
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 21:25 +0200, Dieter Verfaillie wrote:
> Installers are for end user product (GIMP, Gedit, Inkscape, etc)
> but not for libraries and components used to build such end user
> products. An installer for some sort of an SDK however would a
> different matter...
Yes, I just want
>
> There's a couple of patches you need that are not yet upstreamed
> (due to their "ugly hack"/"wip" status) in this branch:
> https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/commits/windows
But then I saw
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/windows-devel-list/2012-July/msg0.html
Which confus
On 7/17/2012 1:56 AM, Stef Walter wrote:
On 07/16/2012 09:40 PM, Damon Register wrote:
It's just for the introspection.m4 file; you should be able to copy it
into the m4/ directory in the GTK+ source.
In general, should we be copying introspection.m4 into our projects?
I don't know but I didn
24 matches
Mail list logo
