Re: widget accessibility roles: being able to override it

2018-03-19 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Samuel Thibault, on lun. 05 mars 2018 16:17:24 +0100, wrote: > Some dialog boxes use labels for static information, e.g. printer > status, replace result, etc. For the screen reader to properly > understand that, it should have role ATK_ROLE_STATIC. I have not found > any wa

.ui: Marking widgets which don't need accessibility labelling

2018-03-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, As part of implementing an accessibility non-regression check tool, we want to make sure that widgets have proper labelling. E.g. GtkEntry basically always need a labelled-by relation. Some other widgets don't necessarily need one, but very often need one (such as radio buttons), so we

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-03-06 Thread Samuel Thibault
Alejandro, on mar. 06 mars 2018 09:35:01 +0100, wrote: > On 05/03/18 15:32, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Bastien Nocera, on lun. 05 mars 2018 15:21:47 +0100, wrote: > >> Perhaps, but you'd be doing a disservice to your users trying to > >> implement this as a "can

widget accessibility roles: being able to override it

2018-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Some dialog boxes use labels for static information, e.g. printer status, replace result, etc. For the screen reader to properly understand that, it should have role ATK_ROLE_STATIC. I have not found any way in glade's .ui format to specify this, actually ROLE_STATIC does not appear in

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Bastien Nocera, on lun. 05 mars 2018 15:21:47 +0100, wrote: > Perhaps, but you'd be doing a disservice to your users trying to > implement this as a "can run anywhere" solution. I don't think there's > any way you can implement this generically so that there's no work > needed on other desktops. >

Re: .ui: Marking widgets which don't need accessibility labelling

2018-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Ping? We'd really like to start marking such labels in LibreOffice, so we need a standard way to do it. Samuel Samuel Thibault, on lun. 26 févr. 2018 11:42:01 +0100, wrote: > Hello, > > As part of implementing an accessibility non-regression check tool, we > want

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-03-05 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Emmanuele Bassi, on jeu. 01 mars 2018 20:27:04 +, wrote: > I was not claiming that the Shell’s zoom is perfect; I’m saying that the Shell > is where things need to be fixed, as it’s where things are implemented > already. Well, that is for gnome. Users shouldn't be tied with gnome

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
Emmanuele Bassi, on jeu. 01 mars 2018 15:32:37 +, wrote: > The display server can not invent information, at best it could > achieve the zoom-gimp.png result, which is really not enough for > visually-impaired people. Here I have only magnified a couple of times, > people quite

Re: No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-03-01 Thread Samuel Thibault
[Re-sending without the attached pictures, too big for the list] Hello, Emmanuele Bassi, on jeu. 01 mars 2018 14:42:27 +0700, wrote: > On 26 February 2018 at 17:49, Samuel Thibault > <samuel.thiba...@ens-lyon.org> wrote: > > Hello, > > > > So, I also saw

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-02-27 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, Alejandro, on mar. 27 févr. 2018 08:11:26 +0100, wrote: > On 26/02/18 11:49, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Without module loading, I don't know how to implement it :) Or perhaps > > this could be added as an AT-SPI interface? > > Being added as an AT-SPI interface would

No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

2018-02-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, So, I also saw the removal of generic modules. Unfortunately we currently need it for implementing perfect zoom feature :) The context is that visual-impaired users need magnification of the desktop. Changing font sizes / dpi etc. have their limit, at some point we need to just have a

.ui: Marking widgets which don't need accessibility labelling

2018-02-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
Hello, As part of implementing an accessibility non-regression check tool, we want to make sure that widgets have proper labelling. E.g. GtkEntry basically always need a labelled-by relation. Some other widgets don't necessarily need one, but very often need one (such as radio buttons), so we

Implementing accessibility non-regression check tool

2018-02-26 Thread Samuel Thibault
eventually. Samuel #!/usr/bin/env python # # Copyright (c) 2018 Martin Pieuchot # Copyright (c) 2018 Samuel Thibault <sthiba...@hypra.fr> # # Permission to use, copy, modify, and distribute this software for any # purpose with or without fee is hereby granted, provided that the above # copyright

Re: [g-a-devel] Exposing masked strings for password fields to accessibility

2012-09-04 Thread Samuel Thibault
Mario Sanchez Prada, le Fri 10 Aug 2012 12:43:58 +0200, a écrit : However, I understand some might see the fact of exposing the number of masked characters as a security issue, so that's why I'm asking for feedback here now. If the visual rendering provides that information, atk should provide