oes in response.
Gestures could include simple clicks and keyboard input, but also
multi-touch gestures and even Emacs-style sequences.
For all GTK+ apps would be a nice start, but cross-toolkit would be even
better.
I wrote more about that back in 2007:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/2007/04/10/
On Thu, 2009-08-20 at 11:59 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Thorsten Wilms wrote:
>
> > * Button down
> > * Button up
> ...
>
> > State of widget model:
> > On/Off/Indecisive
>
> isn't the state of a button intended t
rom it to cancel the
click.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
currently states that shouldn't be mutually
exclusive are.
However, insensitive is special, as it makes everything else
meaningless.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
___
gtk-devel-lis
hthy.med.umich.edu/unicode/fontdialog/
interesting.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
use base-font * multiplier.
This is really great and important work!
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
out. It
should all be defined in themes. No more studying the HIG and manual
labour to get that right. 100% consistency and flexibility instead.
--
Thorsten Wilms
thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
___
gtk-devel-list
