I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
Pardon me if I am daft, but,
- One cannot simply pass a GClosure where a GCallback is expected
(!?).
GTK+ is usually nice--each signal can be paired with data, m
On 5/26/07, Jason Hickey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
Pardon me if I am daft, but,
- One cannot simply pass a GClosure where a GCallback is expected
(!?).
GTK+ is us
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 18:57 -0700, Jason Hickey wrote:
> I am developing a GTK+ binding for OMake (http://omake.metaprl.org).
> OMake has a functional language, so it has closures, etc.
>
> Am I missing something, or is it not possible to deal with closures
> in GtkActionEntry?
GtkActionEnt
On May 27, 2007, at 7:27 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> in this particular case, the data passed to the callback is the one
> you
> pass to gtk_action_group_add_actions():
>
> void gtk_action_group_add_actions (GtkActionGroup
> *action_group,
> const
