On 04/05/2018 04:03 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> Is it not possible to some how use a _move_to_rect() API, and use some
> hint we can assume means it needs to be movable, and until xdg_popup is
> further extended, make the assumption that we should for now use
> subsurfaces?
I would expect that creati
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:00:09AM -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> On 04/05/2018 01:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> > The reason for moving away from using subsurfaces for various things is
> > that they cannot be positioned properly when they extend outside the
> > parent window (they tend to someti
On 04/05/2018 01:32 AM, Jonas Ådahl wrote:
> The reason for moving away from using subsurfaces for various things is
> that they cannot be positioned properly when they extend outside the
> parent window (they tend to sometimes go partly off-screen), and should
> rather use xdg_popup+xdg_positioner
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 01:25:04AM -0700, Christian Hergert wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I'm lobbying to make 2 functions public API in the stable branch (3.x)
> that would help me be able do some fancy things in Builder/Dazzle (which
> I can make work fine on Xorg already).
>
> If there are object
On 04/05/2018 01:25 AM, Christian Hergert wrote:
> Again, this API is available internally to Gtk so widgets like ComboBox
> can use it, but if you're not a GtkWidget, you're outta luck.
Correction: if you're not inside of libgtk3, you're outta luck.
___
Hey everyone,
I'm lobbying to make 2 functions public API in the stable branch (3.x)
that would help me be able do some fancy things in Builder/Dazzle (which
I can make work fine on Xorg already).
If there are objections, I'd like to hear from people so I can find a
way to make forward progress.
