Op 17-sep-04 om 23:55 heeft Haxe het volgende geschreven:
On Thursday 16 September 2004 22:11, Jeroen Asselman wrote:
That is why I'd like to propose another implementation. Instead of
queueing per client, which is what PARQ actually tries to achive,
lets queue per file.
...
What do you think?
For
On Thursday 16 September 2004 22:11, Jeroen Asselman wrote:
> That is why I'd like to propose another implementation. Instead of
> queueing per client, which is what PARQ actually tries to achive,
> lets queue per file.
...
> What do you think?
For the following reasons, I don't think that this wo
alex wrote:
> The table in core/bitzi.c is for enumerating the fixed XML tag into and
> enum. If the the other table needs to a) provide translations, and b)
> isn't in core I'm afraid some duplication will be required.
I see. Just leave it as is then.
> > - There's a bug in bitzi_heartbeat().
On Fri, 2004-09-17 at 04:31 +0200, Christian Biere wrote:
> alex wrote:
> > Hmm, slight bug in src/ui/gtk/gtk2/bitzi.c, the table was missing some
> > comas :-(
>
> To prevent such bugs, it's best to use STATIC_ASSERT(). I guess the
> number of elements depends on some magic value?
Will do.
>
