Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:Raphael Manfredi wrote:
:> The latest Configure does include the warning flags by default if it detects
:> that gcc is being used.
:
:Not here with ./Configure -Oders. Shouldn't the initial value of "hint"
:be 'none' or
Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> The latest Configure does include the warning flags by default if it detects
> that gcc is being used.
Not here with ./Configure -Oders. Shouldn't the initial value of "hint"
be 'none' or 'recommended'?
--
Christian
pgpeA7kK5ZpgS.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:I believe Configure does now pick those ccflags by default. If I
:were a tid more lazy or needed more ccflags and ldflags, I'd put that
:in a wrapper script in my PATH.
The latest Configure does include the warning flag
Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> Isn't life wonderful?
Depends on the current flavour and phase of the moon I'd guess.
--
Christian
pgp1cA4jsNUg1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Alex Bennee wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 05:28 +, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> > As a rule of thumb, whenever "Configure" changes during a "cvs update",
> > it needs to be re-reun as "Configure -ders".
> I've never figured out what the correct "select what I did last time"
> foo for ./Configure
On Mon, 2005-09-19 at 05:28 +, Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> Perhaps, but as I said, Configure already computes VAL_EAGAIN for us,
> and it simplifies things a bit.
>
> As a rule of thumb, whenever "Configure" changes during a "cvs update",
> it needs to be re-reun as "Configure -ders".
>
I've
Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:Personally I despise compile checks which needlessly require
:running code making cross-compiling impossible and are far
:from being "correct".
I agree cross-compiling support is not one of metaconfig's strengths.
But t
Raphael Manfredi wrote:
> Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
> :IMHO, VAL_EAGAIN is unnecessary.
>
> It's a standard metaconfig symbol.
>
> :#if defined(EWOULDBLOCK) && EWOULDBLOCK != EAGAIN
> :...
> :#endif
> :
> :should take care of that, in other plac
Quoting Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> from ml.softs.gtk-gnutella.devel:
:IMHO, VAL_EAGAIN is unnecessary.
It's a standard metaconfig symbol.
:#if defined(EWOULDBLOCK) && EWOULDBLOCK != EAGAIN
:...
:#endif
:
:should take care of that, in other places a macro ERROR_RETRY() might be
:more hand
