Internationalization of GTK Apps (change language)

2006-09-25 Thread Madhusudan E
Hi All, I want my applications to be internationalized. I have included in my app #include glib/gi18n.h and I have set LC_ALL = zh_TWBig5 And I'm using the following way to describe my labels gtk_label_new ( _(Exit)); But my app is not reflecting the language changes (to Chinese). Is there

Re: applications working on uid 0

2006-09-25 Thread Andreas Stricker
chabayo wrote: ...the main problem is the execution of program code suppoesed to processed in uid 0 - system is Linux The fact: I tried to handle the events in /proc/acpi/events by my own application which integrates gtk handled display interaction. Because /proc/acpi/events is gid=0

Re: Internationalization of GTK Apps (change language)

2006-09-25 Thread Andreas Stricker
Madhusudan E wrote: Hi All, I want my applications to be internationalized. I have included in my app #include glib/gi18n.h and I have set LC_ALL = zh_TWBig5 And I'm using the following way to describe my labels gtk_label_new ( _(Exit)); But my app is not reflecting the

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Mike Emmel
It looks like this build does not include my changes to allow the OSX and directfb backends to build. On 9/22/06, Matthias Clasen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: GTK+ 2.10.4 is now available for download at: http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gtk+/2.10/ gtk+-2.10.4.tar.bz2 md5sum:

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32

[Fwd: VTE question]

2006-09-25 Thread Major Csaba
Forwarded Message From: Major Csaba [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gtk-App-Devel-List gtk-app-devel-list gnome org Cc: Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: VTE question Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 14:42:11 +0200 Hi all, I would like to ask a special questions about the VTE widget. I

Re: Re: Internationalization of GTK Apps (change language)

2006-09-25 Thread John Cupitt
On 9/25/06, Andreas Stricker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * There is a good howto somewhere, but I can't find it anymore I found these two helpful: http://www.gnome.org/~malcolm/i18n http://developer.gnome.org/doc/tutorials/gnome-i18n/developer.html Don't know if either of them is the one you

Error in GTK+ v2.10.3 for win32?

2006-09-25 Thread Tomasz Jankowski
Hi! Have enyoone used GTK+ v2.10.3 for win32? I tried to use it and i think, that I found a bug in GtkFileChooser widget (here are more information: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357195). So far my bug wasn't confirmed by anyone beside me. Can someone check if this bug occurs on his

Re: [Fwd: VTE question]

2006-09-25 Thread Behdad Esfahbod
Hi all, Hi, I would like to ask a special questions about the VTE widget. I have to write an extension for VTE that makes possible to save and restore the (all of the visible and non visible) state of the terminal. I've almost done but it doesn't seem to work properly. When I restore the

Linking custom widget

2006-09-25 Thread Mark Richardson
I'm having troubles linking a custom widget I built. I took the gtklabel widget, and renamed all the functions and widget to be gtklabel2 (did this same thing in an older version of gtk and it worked great). Now when I try to link I get unresolved reference to 'IA__gtk_misc_get_type'. If I

Can't link to Pango. Pango is required to build

2006-09-25 Thread Madhusudan E
Hi all: I want to cross compile gtk2.6.10 on linux-fb. I successfully compiled the follow libs: glib-2.6.6, libxml2.6.20,freetype2.1.10, fontconfig2.3.94, atk-1.10.3. and I'm sure they are installed in correct directory. But when i config the

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 9/25/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major

Re: gtk_widget_set_extension_events() is ignoring internal/input-only windows

2006-09-25 Thread Tommi Komulainen
On Fri, 2006-09-22 at 14:29 +0200, ext Tim Janik wrote: well, instead of hacking *every* widget realize function, you could have written a simple loop that walks all GdkWindow children of widget-window recursively and applies extension events as long as gdk_window_get_user_data() == widget.

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here is my current GInputStream: struct _GInputStreamClass { GObjectClass parent_class; Using

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:17 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: i haven't seen API proposals yet (allthough i haven't managed to read through all of this thread yet either ;) so please bear with me if this is covered by your ideas already... to allow applications to extend on the mechanisms and

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: Here is my current GInputStream: struct _GInputStreamClass { GObjectClass parent_class; /* Sync ops: */ gssize (* read)(GInputStream *stream, void *buffer, gsize

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:17 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: i haven't seen API proposals yet (allthough i haven't managed to read through all of this thread yet either ;) so please bear with me if this is covered by your ideas already... to allow

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote: 2) What is the signature of GDestroyNotify ? Its already in gtypes.h: typedef void(*GDestroyNotify) (gpointer data); ah. I forgot about this. Don't you think it

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:51 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: I think I see some confusion about the API abstraction layers here. Consider the vfs as a switch for the filesystem layer. jup, that's exactly what i do. in terms of the unix FS layer, this'd basically allow every app to provide a FUSE fs

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:04 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Wed, 20 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 14:30 +0200, mathieu lacage wrote: 2) What is the signature of GDestroyNotify ? Its already in gtypes.h: typedef void

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here is my current GInputStream: struct _GInputStreamClass {

Re: GdkEvent-type

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Thu, 21 Sep 2006, Jalagandeswari G wrote: Hi All, When a new window is created in X window System CreateNotify event is passed. Is it right? what is the event type which is passed while creating a new window in GDK ? What is the equivalent event type in GTK/GDK for CreateNotify in

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 11:40 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: hm, in your initial proposal, you said that apps don't currently have control over whether they want to use/care about threading or not. so, are you planning for a way to use the GVFS API without threading under the hood? then, emulation of

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 12:47 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: Also, In your example above the extra structure isn't needed. One would just use different destroy notifiers for the two streams. hm, different? you mean you'd encode whether it's stream1 or

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 09:16 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here is my current GInputStream:

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Murray Cumming
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 09:16 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here is my current GInputStream:

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Murray Cumming wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 09:16 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here is

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Alexander Larsson
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 13:00 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you are planning to redesign the VFS. Here

Re: Plans for gnome-vfs replacement

2006-09-25 Thread Tim Janik
On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 13:00 +0200, Tim Janik wrote: On Mon, 25 Sep 2006, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Sun, 2006-09-24 at 14:33 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote: On Wed, 2006-09-20 at 12:31 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: Hey Alex, Great that you

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. I just cvs updated the gtk-2-10 branch, and it's still lacking these fixes: -

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Mike Emmel
OSX was missed also btw the change Behdad had me make effected it too. On 9/25/06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK

Re: [GLIB] Routines that call g_return_if_fail() etc hang/crash [WinXP]

2006-09-25 Thread Olumide
Thanks Tor, How can I using get the stack trace sysinternals's Process Explorer (I've downloaded it). My program is actually a dynamically loaded plugin that runs in a very large app (i.e. Alias|Wavefront Maya). Can I still see the stack trace? I'm would really like to know where what's

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 9/25/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major

Re: back to basics

2006-09-25 Thread Yeti
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006 at 07:46:38AM +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote: In some cases you might find it easier to use either g_shell_parse_argv () or g_shell_parse_argv () as alternatives to scanf() when using glib. Numbers may then be extracted through a simple atof() or atoi(). This usually gives

Re: getting an image from gtkdrawingarea

2006-09-25 Thread Richard Boaz
Hi, I'm a bit confused about some things in your original post and so don't really know what's going on to be of precise help, but some thoughts nonetheless: 1) the speed of the expose event, whether for a GtkImage or a GtkDrawingArea, is a function of how much code must be executed as part of

Re: back to basics

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Dov Grobgeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In some cases you might find it easier to use either g_shell_parse_argv () or g_shell_parse_argv () as alternatives to scanf() when using glib. Numbers may then be extracted through a simple atof() or atoi(). This usually gives better control and

Re: getting an image from gtkdrawingarea

2006-09-25 Thread Michael L. Gualtieri
Thanks for both the replies. They have given me some good ideas. Paul, When I was putting together a small example I realised I wasn't having the same problems that I have in my big app. I was assuming the problem was scale beforehand. Richard, I realised that my expose event was actually being

Re: getting an image from gtkdrawingarea

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Davis
Michael, If you go the route of rendering to a pixmap, there's no real need to have more than one expose method. All you need to do is run your animation as you need it, then queue a redraw for the drawing area. Basically, rendering everyting to a pixmap gives you the ability to render to it as

Re: ComboBox using multi columns TreeModel

2006-09-25 Thread Christophe Dehais
Thanks, for the record, I replaced: combo = gtk_combo_box_entry_new_with_model (GTK_TREE_MODEL(model), NAME_COLUMN); by: text_renderer = gtk_cell_renderer_text_new (); gtk_cell_layout_pack_start (GTK_CELL_LAYOUT (combo), text_renderer, TRUE);

Re: jpeg and gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
- Original Message - From: Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 12:12 AM Subject: Re: jpeg and gtk I just relooked at your make.log, a shot in the dark, but here are two things to try: First, in

Re: jpeg and gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: - Original Message - From: Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 12:12 AM Subject: Re: jpeg and gtk I just relooked at your make.log, a shot in

Re: jpeg and gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Bill, why can't you first install any normal modern Linux distro, and then try to compile from source library after library NOT putting them in system directories ? I've been observing this list for a number of months, and nobody has difficulties like the ones you have, as well as nobody

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Michael Ekstrand
On Sep 23, 2006, at 10:59 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: - Original Message - From: Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:40 PM Subject: Re: gtk Ok Michael this is the configure line I

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 23, 2006, at 10:59 PM, Bill Cunningham wrote: - Original Message - From: Michael Ekstrand [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 11:40 PM Subject:

jpeg and gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Paul, I have two files in usr/local/lib/pkgconfig they are libpng.pc and libpng12.pc. I checked the last line of libpng.pc and the cflags was exactly as yours except /libpng12 was missing after {includedir}. Could this have something to do with m4 since you mentioned macros? I installed a new

gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Paul, I ran pkg-config with the --libs switch for libpng and this is what it said [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ -lpng. I have attached a make.log from what changing libpng.pc there is a couple of lines difference. Bill make.log.gz Description: GNU Zip compressed data

libpng

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Humm. Maybe this is the problem. Pkg-config reports the same info for these two libraries. libpng and libpng12. The link switch and library is the same. And you can't link to this. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ -lpng12 Bill ___ gtk-list mailing list

Re: libpng

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Humm. Maybe this is the problem. Pkg-config reports the same info for these two libraries. libpng and libpng12. The link switch and library is the same. And you can't link to this. [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ -lpng12 Bill

Re: libpng

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
And everything else links against them just fine. --Sergei. Applications From Scratch: http://appsfromscratch.berlios.de/ I would think the makefile would say something like -L/usr/local/lib which is where my libs are. My makefile says [EMAIL PROTECTED]@ when it comes to libpng. Bill

modern linux

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Sergei, I am using an old computer here for internet access. It has a 4G IDE and 96MB RAM. Pretty pathethic huh. And that HD is shared between win98se and RH 7.0 with min installation. So I kinda have to do from scratch. Now I also have a notebook with a 40 GB HD and a AMD 64 Athlon with

Re: modern linux

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sergei, I am using an old computer here for internet access. It has a 4G IDE and 96MB RAM. Pretty pathethic huh. And that HD is shared between win98se and RH 7.0 with min installation. So I kinda have to do from scratch. Now I also

Re: modern linux

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
So, why don't you finally install it ? I'd suggest Ubuntu/MEPIS - they both are derivatives of Debian, but more user-friendly. I like unix too. And I'm kind torn between freeBSD or some other modern unix. Or maybe a unix like linux. Bill ___

Re: modern linux

2006-09-25 Thread Michael L Torrie
Just a suggestion here, but you've started nearly a dozen new e-mail threads over the last couple of days. Could you just reply to the existing thread rather than start a new one each time, since you're still talking about the same things? New threads generally are for new topics. thanks

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Mike Emmel
OSX was missed also btw the change Behdad had me make effected it too. On 9/25/06, Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK

Re: modern linux

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
- Original Message - From: Michael L Torrie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 6:55 PM Subject: Re: modern linux Just a suggestion here, but you've started nearly a dozen new e-mail threads over the last couple of days. Could you just reply to

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
- Original Message - From: Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 6:11 PM Subject: Re: gtk Bill, Make your libpng12.pc in /usr/lib/pkgconfig look like your libpng.pc ie, replace the damned @libdir@ with the same thing that

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Davis
Just copy this libpng.pc into /usr/lib/pkgconfig as both: libpng.pc AND libpng12.pc I just diffed them on my system and they're the same. Don't see why they wouldn't be for you. And make sure they aren't capitolized like the ones you attached. PaulOn 9/25/06, Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
- Original Message - From: Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 8:34 PM Subject: Re: gtk Just copy this libpng.pc into /usr/lib/pkgconfig as both: libpng.pc AND libpng12.pc I just diffed them

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 9/25/06, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
- Original Message - From: Paul Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Bill Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 9:19 PM Subject: Re: gtk Yeah. That'd make a difference. Change the first line from: prefix=/usr to prefix=/usr/local That should be it. Paul

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti
And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. Is there a way to check if the DirctFB backend builds correctly before a major GTK relase, like (i guess) is done for X and win32

Re: GTK+ 2.10.4 released

2006-09-25 Thread Loïc Minier
On Mon, Sep 25, 2006, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: And the DFB backend was indeed found to be broken by the gtk-gnome Debian team when they tried to build a DFB flavour of GTK for use in the debian-installer. I just cvs updated the gtk-2-10 branch, and it's still lacking these fixes: -

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Paul Davis
Bill, Interesting. First I'd check that the file is intact. Try viewing it with display or evince or some other program capable of viewing the file. Its in gtk+-2.10.3/demos/ You can also try running the program on some other pngs you might have on your computer. Try running: $

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Michael Torrie
On Mon, 2006-09-25 at 23:11 -0400, Bill Cunningham wrote: Ok Paul I put your script in place of my libpng.pc and made a symlinl called libpng12.pc to it. I got alot farther in the gtk compilation too. But then it broke again. Here's a log. Looks to me like the gdk pixbuf shared library

Re: gtk

2006-09-25 Thread Bill Cunningham
Or you could go back and try rebuilding libpng. Cause that really does seem to be the root of all your problems. Hope that helps, Paul I think I'll try rebuilding the libpng library. Maybe I set something wrong on something. Bill ___

RE: SimpleList drag and drop- works better

2006-09-25 Thread Ratcliffe, Jeffrey (Peters)
Hi again, this does it properly, (I think), without a global flag, and using the proper signals instead of watching events. The key is to use the drag_end signal instead of drag_drop Excellent! Thanks very much (but I could have sworn I'd tried that myself - evidently not seeing the wood for

IDE

2006-09-25 Thread Ratcliffe, Jeffrey (Peters)
Sorry for this being slightly off-topic, but: Are any of you guys using an IDE? For want of anything better, I am using nedit, which looks foul on Ubuntu Dapper, but is a miles better editor than gedit. I tried out Eclipse + EPIC, but the editor was nowhere near as nice as nedit and I could

Re: IDE

2006-09-25 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Ratcliffe, Jeffrey (Peters) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry for this being slightly off-topic, but: Are any of you guys using an IDE? For want of anything better, I am using nedit, which looks foul on Ubuntu Dapper, but is a miles better editor than gedit. I tried out Eclipse +

Re: IDE

2006-09-25 Thread Daniel Kasak
Ratcliffe, Jeffrey (Peters) wrote: Sorry for this being slightly off-topic, but: Are any of you guys using an IDE? For want of anything better, I am using nedit, which looks foul on Ubuntu Dapper, but is a miles better editor than gedit. I tried out Eclipse + EPIC, but the editor was