Re: GdkScreen size-changed and gdk_monitor_get_workarea problem

On Thu, 2018-11-08 at 12:34 +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote: > Dear Bastien, > > thanks for the reply. I will attach a sample next time. > > My App runs with the X11 backend. > > I was able to resolve the issue yesterday, and found that it was not > directly a Problem of GTK+. > > The

Re: GdkScreen size-changed and gdk_monitor_get_workarea problem

On Tue, 2018-11-06 at 21:35 +0100, Sebastian Geiger (Lanoxx) wrote: > Hi Gtk developers, > > I am experiencing a wired issue and I am wondering if I am using the > API > in a wrong way of if there is a problem with Gtk. On Wayland or X11? > gdk_display_get_monitor_at_point and then

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 07:40 +0100, John Cupitt via gtk-devel-list wrote: > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 03:11, Magnus Bergman > wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:07:27 +0200 > > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > No, it really isn't: > > > https://www.cvedetails.c

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 22:29 +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:31:42 +0200 > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > I've written loader for GIF that simply wraps abydos. In lines of > > > code it's about a quarter the size of the current loader, even &g

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

On Sun, 2018-09-09 at 01:23 +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: > On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:51:32 +0200 > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > > Gegl is great for image editing. But not as much for simple > > > > viewing. > > > > > > This is debatable. If

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 11:39 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-devel-list wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 19:25, Magnus Bergman < > magnus.berg...@snisurset.net> wrote: > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:28:22 +0100 > > Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > > > > We're phasing out Cairo in favour of the CSS rendering

Re: Problems with git.gnome.org

On Thu, 2018-09-06 at 14:09 +0100, John Emmas wrote: > Hi guys - sorry for posting this here but I've tried gnome's > 'gitlab-issues' mailing list and couldn't get any response. Maybe > someone here can help..? > > For the past few weeks I've been seeing errors if I try to update > (i.e. >

Re: Using "user.mime_type" xattr for MIME guessing

On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 13:09 -0400, Colin Atkinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2018 at 10:47 AM Bastien Nocera > wrote: > > On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 10:35 -0400, Colin Atkinson via gtk-devel- > > list > > wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > I'm working on a FUS

Re: Using "user.mime_type" xattr for MIME guessing

On Thu, 2018-08-09 at 10:35 -0400, Colin Atkinson via gtk-devel-list wrote: > Hi everyone, > I'm working on a FUSE file system which makes network requests > whenever a file is read. So obviously, I would like to avoid excess > read requests to files. > > The current implementation [0] of gio's

Re: [g-a-devel] No module anymore & perfect zoom feature

On Mon, 2018-03-05 at 15:05 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Hello, > > Emmanuele Bassi, on jeu. 01 mars 2018 20:27:04 +, wrote: > > I was not claiming that the Shell’s zoom is perfect; I’m saying > > that the Shell > > is where things need to be fixed, as it’s where things are > > implemented

Re: migrating gtk

On Sat, 2018-02-10 at 16:43 +0100, Salvatore De Paolis wrote: > On Thu, 08 Feb 2018 02:00:16 + > Sriram Ramkrishna wrote: > > > Every contributor who takes an actionable step and reports a bug is > > a > > potential future core contributor. Please remember that. A

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 14:45 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 02:06:01PM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:06 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > Also, it's not primarily about the location of the cache but the > > > thumbna

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 11:06 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > Hey, > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:46:30AM +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 15:42 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > > > However, the edits are application-specific [2], so it is not > > >

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

On Mon, 2018-01-29 at 15:42 +, Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 12:46:51PM +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall > k> wrote: > > > From the GLib side of things, my thoughts are that this > > > shouldn???t live > > >

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:22 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hey, > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > >

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 12:46 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On 22 January 2018 at 09:28, Philip Withnall <phi...@tecnocode.co.uk> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: >

Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

Hey Philip, On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 09:28 +, Philip Withnall wrote: > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 18:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I wanted to start a discussion about r

GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement

Hey, I wanted to start a discussion about replacing GnomeDesktopThumbnail with an API that would live in the GLib/GTK+ stack. Why --- We want to replace/move the current API because it lives in gnome- desktop, which is a collection of helpers used by the core desktop, and highly dependent on

Re: First deprecate APIs and then remove them in the next major version

On Thu, 2017-12-14 at 19:56 +0100, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > With "soft API breaks" (i.e. just removing an API that was deprecated > in > a previous major version), I think this would improve a lot the > situation and would avoid to repeat the same problem as GTK+ 2 -> 3. It already exists.

Re: GApplication process uniqueness, saving config files and multi-seat support

On Sun, 2017-09-10 at 13:27 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > Hi, > > With GApplication process uniqueness, an application has a unique > process per user *session*. But with multi-seat support, it is > possible > AFAIK to open several graphical sessions for the same user. > > Some GTK+ apps save

Re: GDBus signal reaches after GDBus method returns

On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 20:18 +0900, Takao Fujiwara wrote: > Do you have any ideas how to receive a GDBus signal before the GDBus > method returns? > When I run the following program, the return of "KeyEvent" is always > output faster than "CommitText" signal in the client program. > Or do you have

Re: Building glib-genmarshal (while building glib)

On Sat, 2017-08-12 at 16:45 +0100, John Emmas wrote: > On 12/08/2017 14:04, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > > >From the news file for version 2.53.4: > > > > https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/tree/NEWS > > > > * glib-genmarshal and glib-mkenums have been rewritten in python. > > Every effort has

Re: [PATCH v2] glib/gpoll: Remove if conditional

Patches are best attached to bugzilla. You can use "git-bz" to file the bug and attach your path directly there. Don't hesitate to reply if you have trouble filing the bug or attaching the patch. Cheers > On 26 Jul 2017, at 22:16, Alistair Francis wrote: > > On Fri,

Re: Color fonts

On Thu, 2017-06-29 at 23:18 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > I had another go at this here: > https://github.com/matthiasclasen/cairo/tree/emoji-again I rebased your old branch on top of 1.14.10 (the current stable): https://fedorapeople.org/~hadess/emoji/cairo-emoji-5-rebased-on-1.14.10.patch

Re: Moving to glade and GtkInspector

On Mon, 2017-04-03 at 01:29 -0400, Martin Owens wrote: > Hi Gtk Devs, > > I'm brining this up in devel mailing list because it might not be > possible to do well enough, but I'm interested in raising the > question > of moving projects from widget code to glade ui files. > > I work on Inkscape.

Re: gdk-pixbuf - JPEG comments patch

On Sat, 2017-03-11 at 17:08 +0100, The Xj wrote: > Hi, > > I'm looking for someone who can commit my small patch to official > repository. > The patch it's a partial solution for this: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143608 > > Originally I've made the change as a pull request on

Re: GSoC/Outreachy ideas for gdk-pixbuf

On Mon, 2017-01-09 at 16:50 +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: > On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 7:31 PM, Bastien Nocera <had...@hadess.net> > wrote: > > 2) Use giflib to load GIF files > > Again, the gif loader is kind of hard to read and maintain and > > giflib > > seems t

GSoC/Outreachy ideas for gdk-pixbuf

Hey, I spent a bit of time with gdk-pixbuf at the end of December, and had an idea for gdk-pixbuf. I know a few people want to get rid of gdk-pixbuf, but let's be realistic, the amount of work needed to shift away from it would be far too great to be done in one go, so why not make gdk-pixbuf

Re: Up-to-date Valgrind suppression file for GLib/GTK+ ?

On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 16:02 +0100, Stefan Sauer wrote: > On 12/30/2016 12:09 PM, jcup...@gmail.com wrote: > > On 29 December 2016 at 23:55, Emmanuele Bassi > > wrote: > > > As Philip explained earlier in the thread, Valgrind can only > > > accept a > > > single suppression file.

Re: gtk changes in the jhbuild moduleset

On Fri, 2016-10-07 at 06:33 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > Hi, > > we are getting ready to start development of gtk 3.90 in master. > To avoid causing lots of breakage and irritation, here is the plan: > > 1) Switch the modulesets to use the gtk-3-22 branch for the gtk > module > 2) Rename the

Re: Gtk 3.21.6?

On Mon, 2016-09-12 at 14:33 +0100, Phillip Wood wrote: > I've just noticed that the Gtk blog says the 3.21.5 release is likely > to > be the last release before 3.22.0. I'm not sure if that is still the > case, but I'd like to do a 3.21.92 release for sound-juicer that > relies > on a Gtk version

Re: Moving thumbnailing code

On Sun, 2016-06-26 at 13:45 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > Hey, > > gnome-desktop, the library, is a remnant of the old "libgnomeui" with > useful widgets that could not be in GTK+, and helper utilities that > might not be ready for merging in GLib. > > Nowada

Moving thumbnailing code

Hey, gnome-desktop, the library, is a remnant of the old "libgnomeui" with useful widgets that could not be in GTK+, and helper utilities that might not be ready for merging in GLib. Nowadays, gnome-desktop only contains utilities that are shared between desktop components

Re: Number of dynamically linked libraries (Was: Re: Gtk+4.0)

On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:14 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 05:07:46PM +0100, Simon McVittie wrote: > > > 2. Add experimental features through external libraries (libsexy > > > and so > > > on?) > > > > > and linking a large number of tiny libraries has a measurable > >

Re: wayland tablet support redux

On Wed, 2016-03-30 at 16:46 +0200, Carlos Garnacho wrote: > Hey all, > > Now that 3.22 is open, and that the v1 of the wayland tablet protocol > is formalized, I'll be attempting to merge wip/wayland-tablet again. > Some random concepts: > > =What's new in the branch= > The main new API feature

Re: elementary would like to participate :)

On Sun, 2015-11-08 at 20:24 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:32 PM, Daniel Foré > wrote: > > Hey folks, > > > > Sri and Matthias pointed us here. Basically the idea is we want to > > start a discussion about how elementary can be more

Re: elementary would like to participate :)

On Thu, 2015-11-05 at 13:32 -0800, Daniel Foré wrote: > > If you're not familiar with Granite, it's a Gtk+ based library that > elementary uses in our apps. It contains some widgets and utils and > things for stuff that we found ourselves rewriting over and over. > It's written in Vala and you

Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 01:20 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 18:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Cosimo Cecchi <cosi...@gnome.org> > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM,

Re: Reinstate support for OS X versions older than 10.9

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 18:58 -0500, Ryan Schmidt wrote: > On Sep 22, 2015, at 6:32 PM, John Ralls wrote: > > > I’m a bit conflicted about this. Yes, 10.9 is a bit new for a > > cutoff, but on the other hand upgrades to 10.10 are free and run on > > any machine that can run 10.7 > > Per the

Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 18:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Cosimo Cecchi > wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Owen Taylor > > wrote: > > > Do we trust this code or not? If not, we should either a) sandbox >

Re: MSVC build error in gdk-pixbuf

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 18:22 +0800, Fan, Chun-wei (范君維) wrote: > Hi Bastien and John, > > In fact, I have a patch for this at bug 734556 comment 7, because the > change that brought about this issue was from that bug. > > With blessings, thank you! Don't leave patches in closed bugs. Re-open it,

Re: MSVC build error in gdk-pixbuf

On Fri, 2015-09-11 at 10:47 +0100, John Emmas wrote: > Hi guys. I'm hoping this is the right place to report a build error > with gdk-pixbuf (git master). Bugzilla is a better place for reporting bugs. Cheers ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list

Re: GDBusProxy missing bus signals during construction

On Thu, 2015-07-23 at 21:59 +0100, Roger James wrote: snip I propose to get this by round this by subscribing to the Avahi ItemNew signal on my AvahiServer proxy to catch the updates and then unscribing it after I have connected the gobject signal on the 'AvahiServiceBrowser' proxy.

Re: I'm done with O_CLOEXEC

On Sat, 2015-03-21 at 01:32 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote: hi, On Sat, Mar 21, 2015, at 01:27, Jürg Billeter wrote: Doesn't the following standard POSIX functionality provide what you want? fcntl(fd, F_DUPFD_CLOEXEC, 0) Yes. It does. Thank you very much. It seems that this is a

Re: HAVE_NETLINK

On Tue, 2014-12-16 at 13:12 +, John Emmas wrote: When building libglib, should I define 'HAVE_NETLINK' only when building for Linux ?? I'm building for Windows (with MSVC). When I updated glib this morning (from git master) I noticed that a new source file was recently added

Re: Building gdk-pixbuf loaders as static libs

On Tue, 2014-12-02 at 12:10 +0100, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote: John, in the link you can find out a couple of patches that needed to be applied, also here is the option we pass using mingw: https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/blob/master/mingw-w64-gdk-pixbuf2/PKGBUILD#L45 Not

Re: State of gdk-pixbuf

On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 17:29 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: hi; On 23 October 2014 11:55, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I'm particularly interested to know what cairo, pixman and other image manipulation

Re: State of gdk-pixbuf

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 13:30 +, Benjamin Otte wrote: Bastien Nocera hadess at hadess.net writes: I'm particularly interested to know what cairo, pixman and other image manipulation libraries can do for us. Benjamin surely has comments[2] :) I think gdk-pixbuf should just die already

Re: State of gdk-pixbuf

On Fri, 2014-10-24 at 09:07 -0700, Jim Nelson wrote: To chime in with my two cents here: When we started Shotwell in 2009, we got tremendous mileage out of GdkPixbuf. We looked into GAGL/BABL at one point and got worried about speed. (Remember, Shotwell has a non-destructive photo

Re: State of gdk-pixbuf

that are already in bugzilla, and make sure that gdk-pixbuf upstream is usable for Windows. Cheers On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: Hey, I've spent a couple of days triaging all the gdk-pixbuf bugs, wrangling

Re: State of gdk-pixbuf

On Thu, 2014-10-23 at 13:02 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: hi; On 23 October 2014 11:55, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: I'm particularly interested to know what cairo, pixman and other image manipulation libraries can do for us. Benjamin surely has comments[2] :)

State of gdk-pixbuf

Hey, I've spent a couple of days triaging all the gdk-pixbuf bugs, wrangling patches, and testing what was testable. The bugs left over basically fall in a few categories: - Bugs or feature requests in the loaders. There's quite a few of them that could probably be handled in minutes, or maybe in

Re: Physically based kinetic scrolling

Hey, On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 13:58 +0100, Lieven van der Heide wrote: I modified the scrolled windows kinetic scrolling to match the actual physics laws for friction and springs. IMHO, this gives a much more pleasing result. A branch with these changes is at

Re: Physically based kinetic scrolling

On Mon, 2014-05-05 at 10:04 -0400, Hashem Nasarat wrote: Sweet feature! But Is this legal to implement? As far as I know, doesn't a portion of the Apple v Samsung trial have to do with the way Samsung implemented touch scrolling? Also, aren't apple's patents the reason why Android

G-i annotations for transformation functions

Heya, I'm trying to solve: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728504 These functions: https://git.gnome.org/browse/gom/tree/gom/gom-resource.h#n64 create the following warning: gom/gom-resource.h:77: Warning: Gom: gom_resource_class_set_property_transform: argument to_bytes_func:

Re: JavaScript stack trace in ABRT bug reports

On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 04:30 -0400, Jakub Filak wrote: Hello, I a member of the ABRT team. We have recently found an interesting page about GNOME Shell debugging[1]. According to that page, it is possible to obtain a stack trace of executed JavaScript code in gdb. So we got an idea to include

Re: libsoup + gsettings-desktop-schemas for server code

On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 14:40 +, Colin Walters wrote: Hi, I use GLib/gjs for server side code in several places. For example, I recently wrote https://github.com/cgwalters/min-metadata-service which uses libsoup. Which at the RPM level, Requires: glib-networking which in turn

Re: RFC: gestures

On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 00:55 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hey everyone, In the past days I've been hacking again on the gestures branch, and it's reaching an state where I feel it's getting quite solid, so I would like to get discussion started, tentatively aiming to get this included early

Re: gobject-introspection: Cryptic error in g-ir-scanner

On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 15:20 +0530, Ankit Vani wrote: Hi I have set up gobject-introspection in Pidgin -- and it works well for libpurple, pidgin and finch. However, g-ir-scanner dies with a very cryptic error when g-ir-scanner scans libgnt. The error looks like: GISCAN Gnt-2.8.gir

Re: gobject-introspection: Cryptic error in g-ir-scanner

On Tue, 2014-02-04 at 15:34 +0530, Ankit Vani wrote: On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: Try getting a backtrace of the crash. It's likely a bug in the library itself. Can you tell me how exactly to go about getting a backtrace? I've tried using gdb

Re: Print module for Google Cloud Print

On Fri, 2014-01-31 at 13:17 +, Tim Waugh wrote: Hello! I've made a simple print module to support printing to Google Cloud Print. This is a web service provided by Google that allows people to share their printers. https://www.google.com/cloudprint/learn/ In addition to being able to

Re: [PATCH 0/3][RFC v2] gdbus: Preliminary kdbus-support patches

On Wed, 2014-01-08 at 14:44 +0100, Lukasz Skalski wrote: Changes since v1: = This should probably go to bugzilla instead. git-bz can help you attach series of patches easily. (and I'd like to know the bug URL when you do :) Cheers

GdNotification in GTK+?

Hey, Seems that GdNotification didn't make the jump into GTK+ itself. Does anyone have a bug reference for the port if there's one? Otherwise I'll file one and might write that code up, it should be quite a lot less of code using GtkRevealer instead of the custom animation code. For those who

Re: Regarding Maintainer of package gdk-pixbuf

On Thu, 2013-11-28 at 01:59 -0500, s...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: Thanks Jasper. Will contact Matthias Clasen. You should attach your patches to bugzilla instead... Quoting Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net: The maintainer is Matthias Clasen, although you should simply attach your

Re: Removal of icons in buttons/menus

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:14 +0200, Olivier Brunel wrote: Ok, but this isn't about a change in GNOME, but in GTK. And the default for those options was still TRUE a few days ago in GTK 3.8 As we're on this subject, I think it's pretty clear, from the committers to where the mailing-lists are

Re: Spell checking in GIO

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:01 +0200, Sébastien Wilmet wrote: snip For a command line application, Enchant is still available. So it's maybe a better idea to implement the spell checking directly in GTK+. I'll think about the possible API additions. I wouldn't want to use 2 different APIs when

Re: Removal of icons in buttons/menus

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:45 +0200, Michael Natterer wrote: On 10/09/2013 10:40 PM, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 22:14 +0200, Olivier Brunel wrote: Ok, but this isn't about a change in GNOME, but in GTK. And the default for those options was still TRUE a few days ago in GTK

Re: Removal of icons in buttons/menus

On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 23:15 +0200, Tristan Van Berkom wrote: GNOME: A desktop environment / User experience By this definition (which seems to be a common slur these days), then no, GTK+ is certainly not just a toolbox for the purpose of assembling a particular user experience. Let's try

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 09:41 -0400, William Jon McCann wrote: Hi, As some of you may have noticed we have recently deprecated Stock Items in master. Some details on this change may be found here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1KCVPoYQBqMbDP11tHPpjW6uaEHrvLUmcDPqKAppCY8o/pub

Re: Stock Items Deprecation

On Tue, 2013-07-02 at 10:44 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Tristan Van Berkom t...@gnome.org wrote: Besides what Bastian already points out, I have another concern if we are to consider moving away from stock items completely. The document above

Re: Storage API

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 11:29 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: Heya, I've started writing a simple database-like application in Javascript using GTK+, and I wondered about what to use for storage. gjs currently doesn't have bindings

Re: Storage API

On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 12:31 -0400, Colin Walters wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:31 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: Dumping serialised Javascript objects to the filesystem isn't really elegant either. It isn't, but for what it's worth that's what I do currently: https://git.gnome.org

Re: New drawing/scrolling model

Em Thu, 2013-05-02 às 14:40 -0400, Alexander Larsson escreveu: I've tried a bunch of apps and most things seem to work. Currently I know of two problems: The control-center background panel calls gdk_cairo_create() inside the draw() handler, which draws directly to the window rather than the

Storage API

Heya, I've started writing a simple database-like application in Javascript using GTK+, and I wondered about what to use for storage. gjs currently doesn't have bindings for SQLite, and using intermediate bindings like libgda I found too low-level (provider-specific SQL, the need to write SQL

Re: Sharing settings between Nautilus and Filechooser

On Tue, 2012-11-20 at 18:51 -0800, Timothy Arceri wrote: Hi Guys, I'm looking a fixing https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143599 (Share show hidden option with Nautilus). There is also a bug to do with sharing the single clicking settings however this is more complex so I

Re: Mainloop debugging tool idea

Em Mon, 2012-11-19 às 13:20 +, Chris Vine escreveu: On Mon, 19 Nov 2012 00:55:49 +0100 Bastien Nocera had...@hadess.net wrote: I had some problems with gnome-shell's responsiveness on particularly dodgy hardware, and was wondering whether the shell was actually blocking at any point

Mainloop debugging tool idea

Heya, I had some problems with gnome-shell's responsiveness on particularly dodgy hardware, and was wondering whether the shell was actually blocking at any point. Came the idea of using of watchdog thread, based on the mainloop, which would check for how long the mainloop was running a

Re: notifications in gtk

A couple of comments: - Would system software (eg. battery notification) be using parts of this API, or would we need to come up with our own helpers on top of the D-Bus API? - gtk_application_get_notifications() doesn't mention that activated notifications will still be present if recurring. -

Re: Adding gtkparasite to gtk?

Hey Christian, On Wed, 2012-10-10 at 01:16 +0200, Rui Tiago Cação Matos wrote: Hi Christian, On 10 October 2012 01:10, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: That's a fine goal and all, but I must ask why people haven't sent us these patches and worked around our repository? We're

Re: glib branched

On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 08:20 +0200, David Nečas wrote: On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 12:35:57AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: I have now created a glib-2-34 branch, so master is now open for ... GTask ... Is this also intended, at least in the future, for things like long-running calculations

Re: g_get_home_dir (), ${HOME}, and getpwuid ()-pw_dir

Em Thu, 2012-09-27 às 12:42 +0700, Ivan Shmakov escreveu: [This issue is currently being discussed in debian-devel@ [0], and it was suggested to bring it to gtk-devel-list@ as well.] What's the TL;DR? It's a very long mail, weirdly formatted, and I don't understand what you expect

Re: GTK+ meetup at Guadec

On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 00:20 +0200, Philip Chimento wrote: On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Matthias Clasen matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote: - We need to document how one extends GTK+ itself (eg how to create a new widget class), to make it easier for new people to get involved (I'll try to

Re: Why keysym constants in gdk/gdkkeysyms.h are defined as macros, not as an enum?

On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 16:02 +0300, Mark Vender wrote: Hello, Is there any reason why preprocessor macros are used to define the GDK keysym constants in gdk/gdkkeysyms.h instead of an enum? For what it's worth, there's no advantage in using macros. They are inconsistent with other

Re: Why keysym constants in gdk/gdkkeysyms.h are defined as macros, not as an enum?

On 26 Jun 2012, at 22:56, Mark Vender markv...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: which has no chance of negative effects. Even if we add values, they are still stored in an int, that is, GdkKeySym is never used. If its definition is public, it will be used. Thus, in my opinion, even a small improvement is

Re: Adding gtkparasite to gtk?

On Fri, 2012-04-27 at 10:10 -0400, D.H. Bahr wrote: On a similar hand: is there a Gtk(3)Parasite yet?? In this thread... http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnome.gtk+.devel.general/22127/focus=22139 ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list

Re: Adding gtkparasite to gtk?

Em Fri, 2012-02-17 às 03:14 +, Alberto Ruiz escreveu: Hey, Has anyone stepped up to port it to Gtk+3? Numerous times. And my hack of a port is even in jhbuild. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org

Re: Multitouch review 2: press-and-hold

On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 19:43 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: snip Also, most widgets that might want press-and-hold won't listen by default to touch events, so they'll just receive events from the emulating touch anyway. Wouldn't a WebKit view use both (zooming vs. text selection)?

Re: Multitouch review 2: press-and-hold

On Tue, 2012-01-31 at 19:18 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: API: GtkWidget::press-and-hold GTK_PRESS_AND_HOLD_{QUERY,TRIGGER,CANCEL} GTK_STYLE_CLASS_PRESS_AND_HOLD style class GtkSettings::gtk-press-and-hold-timeout setting This feature has a long history going back to 2005 and Hildon

Re: Multitouch review 3: kinetic scrolling

On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 00:48 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote: Hey :), On mié, 2012-02-01 at 23:37 +0100, Florian Müllner wrote: On mié, 2012-02-01 at 08:00 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: - Restricting kinetic scrolling to touch devices is correct, experience-wise Is it? I don't think

Re: RFC: new features

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 17:34 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: Hopefully this isn't getting old, but I'm sort of just throwing these out there as I think of them. snip BACKGROUND OPACITY It would be nice to have the ability to alter the opacity of a window without altering the opacity of

Re: RFC: new features

On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 15:04 +, Bastien Nocera wrote: On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:23 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 20:38 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: snip MENU BUTTON A GtkButton that shows a menu when clicked (and handles positioning, etc). Some would just

Re: RFC: new features

On Thu, 2012-01-12 at 11:23 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote: On Wed, 2012-01-11 at 20:38 -0800, Christian Hergert wrote: snip MENU BUTTON A GtkButton that shows a menu when clicked (and handles positioning, etc). Some would just use a combobox, but I find them pretty different. You'll find

Re: Glib resource framework

Em Thu, 2011-12-22 às 08:49 +0100, Enrico Weigelt escreveu: * Hub Figui?re hfigui...@teaser.fr schrieb: Maybe we could actually support bundles like it is done on MacOS. ./configure --prefix=foo ? It doesn't magically make libraries and binaries relocatable. I tried reading this thread

Re: GVariant singletons

On Thu, 2011-12-08 at 10:15 +, Simon McVittie wrote: On Wed, 07 Dec 2011 at 20:06:32 +0100, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote: And yes, yes, I know this is another slap in the face for the valgrind camp. Sorry! Commit a Valgrind suppressions file to GLib and all will be forgiven :-)

Re: GTK+ 3.3.4 released

On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 20:03 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: * GtkApplication no longer uses gtk_main internally What do we replace g_main_quit() with then? The documentation for g_application_release() doesn't inspire confidence:

Re: New modes for GtkProgressBar

On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 15:54 +0530, Rhishikesh a écrit : First mode would be an activity mode which could be used for showing ongoing indeterminate activity ...and wouldn't you use a GtkSpinner for this? ;-) Or the activity

Re: New modes for GtkProgressBar

On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 17:44 +0100, Milan Bouchet-Valat wrote: Le lundi 31 octobre 2011 à 15:54 +0530, Rhishikesh a écrit : First mode would be an activity mode which could be used for showing ongoing indeterminate activity ...and wouldn't you use a GtkSpinner for this? ;-) Or the activity

Re: gtk-2-24 has new strings

On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 18:46 -0500, Federico Mena Quintero wrote: Dear translators, I've just pushed some changes to the file chooser in the gtk+ module, specifically to the gtk-2-24 branch. Although right now the focus is 3.x, we will likely have another release in the 2.24.x series for

Re: GLib: libffi dependency

On Fri, 2011-05-06 at 11:02 -0400, David Zeuthen wrote: Hi, On Fri, May 6, 2011 at 10:51 AM, Maarten Bosmans mkbosm...@gmail.com wrote: Is it possible to make that an optional dependency? e.g. --with-libffi or --enable-gdbus-codegen No, this dependency is part of the ABI, the newly

Re: libegg: Removing old directories

On Tue, 2011-03-22 at 13:03 +1300, John Stowers wrote: On Mon, 2011-03-21 at 10:51 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: On Sun, 2011-03-20 at 20:03 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote: libegg has lots of directories that

  1   2   >