Hi,
me again. Seems there are some nice solutions for C++ wrappers (for GTK+).
But that throws up the following question:
What speaks against leaving GTK+ functions as they are and just write
a C++ program (without a wrapper)???
Maybe I sound plain stupid now, but, is there also a C wrapper
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
me again. Seems there are some nice solutions for C++ wrappers (for GTK+).
But that throws up the following question:
What speaks against leaving GTK+ functions as they are and just write
a C++ program (without a wrapper)???
Maybe I sound plain stupid
Hello,
I'm a newbie to GTK+ (programming) and I only have a minimal clue about
C++ wrappers. Due to certain reasons (not explained here) I have to
use a C++ wrapper for GTK+.
Can anyone (experienced) tell me a good C++ wrapper (btw, someone should
update the dead links of the FAQ). How can I
I have tried gtk--. This seems to be thought of as the standard c++
binding for gtk+. I cant tell if it is the best since it is the only one
I've tried. The drawback is that it is difficult to install from source,
so you have to get the binary packages. At least I havn't been able to
install
I have tried gtk--. This seems to be thought of as the standard c++
binding for gtk+. I cant tell if it is the best since it is the only one
I've tried. The drawback is that it is difficult to install from source,
so you have to get the binary packages. At least I havn't been able to
install from
configure complaines about sigc++ not being sane. If I disable the sigc++
test under configuration, gtk-- compiles, but the linker does not link
against the sigc++ library. I tried both the version of sigc++ that comes
with redhat 7.2 and the latest version that I compiled up
myself (configured
