> On Dec 24, 2021, at 6:43 AM, Pascal wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> gobject-introspection seems not in pygobject3 dependency list:
>
> % jhbuild build pygobject3
> Loading .env environment variables...
> in jhbuildrc-custom
> *** Checking out zlib *** [1/20
Hello,
gobject-introspection seems not in pygobject3 dependency list:
% jhbuild build pygobject3
Loading .env environment variables...
in jhbuildrc-custom
*** Checking out zlib *** [1/20]
*** Skipping zlib (package and dependencies not updated) *** [1/20]
*** Checking out libpng *** [2/20
UNSUBSCRIBE
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 6:55 PM Brian Manning via gtk-perl-list <
gtk-perl-list@gnome.org> wrote:
> Overview of changes in Cairo::GObject 1.005 (stable) [2019-08-26]
> ==
>
> * Fix typo "registed"
Overview of changes in Cairo::GObject 1.005 (stable) [2019-08-26]
==
* Fix typo "registed" in comment (GNOME/perl-cairo-gobject!1)
Cairo::GObject is available via CPAN, or as a tarball from Sourceforge:
http://downloads.sourc
On 04.06.19 20:53, Brian Manning wrote:
This RT ticket was submitted to fix compile problems under Straberry
Perl on Windows...
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129712
Does anyone see a problem applying the patch in the ticket to the
Cairo::GObject library and making a release?
I
Hi all,
This RT ticket was submitted to fix compile problems under Straberry
Perl on Windows...
https://rt.cpan.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=129712
Does anyone see a problem applying the patch in the ticket to the
Cairo::GObject library and making a release?
I do want to change the /win32/ regex
et_string(value, g_strdup(turtle->filename));
>
> This sample code is from GLib-2.0 API Reference Manual:
>
> ====
>
> gint intval;
> gchar *strval;
> GObject *objval;
>
> g_object_get (my_object,
> &qu
()?
Or does g_value_set_string() duplicate the string for me?
Does the following make any sense?
g_value_set_string(value, g_strdup(turtle->filename));
This sample code is from GLib-2.0 API Reference Manual:
gint intval;
gchar *strval;
GObject *obj
On Tue, Dec 18, 2018 at 01:01:45PM -0500, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I have created, and registered, a custom GObject type [an object]. I
> can place that type into a ListModel: aka model =
> Gtk.ListModel(MyClass).
>
> One of the advantages of creating a GObject is the whole pr
, a custom GObject type [an object]. I
can place that type into a ListModel: aka model =
Gtk.ListModel(MyClass).
One of the advantages of creating a GObject is the whole property
system - - - and most notably change signals.
And how exactly does that improve on the /model.connect("row-ch
I have created, and registered, a custom GObject type [an object]. I
can place that type into a ListModel: aka model =
Gtk.ListModel(MyClass).
One of the advantages of creating a GObject is the whole property
system - - - and most notably change signals.
What I have not been able to find is how
I have a Nim gintro user who has both GTK4 and GTK3 installed on his
box, and seems to have some trouble:
https://github.com/StefanSalewski/gintro/issues/30
I can not test that, because for my Gentoo Linux box only GTK3 is
official available.
My gintro package should generate latest GTK3
Il Sun, 6 May 2018 09:47:05 -0300 Colomban Wendling
<lists@herbesfolles.org> scrisse:
> Le 06/05/2018 à 09:05, Nicola Fontana a écrit :
> > Il Sat, 07 Apr 2018 06:25:52 +0200 Arun Gurung <aru...@anubis-ca.com>
> > scrisse:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >
Le 06/05/2018 à 09:05, Nicola Fontana a écrit :
> Il Sat, 07 Apr 2018 06:25:52 +0200 Arun Gurung <aru...@anubis-ca.com> scrisse:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have gobject-introspection-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64 and gobject-
>> introspection-devel-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64. I tried
Il Sat, 07 Apr 2018 06:25:52 +0200 Arun Gurung <aru...@anubis-ca.com> scrisse:
> Hi,
>
> I have gobject-introspection-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64 and gobject-
> introspection-devel-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64. I tried to use a program like
> "menulibre" and "devedeng&qu
On 6 May 2018 at 12:25, <gtk-devel-list-requ...@gnome.org> wrote:
> I have gobject-introspection-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64 and gobject-
> introspection-devel-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64. I tried to use a program like
> "menulibre" and "devedeng" and the develop
Hi,
I have gobject-introspection-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64 and gobject-
introspection-devel-1.50.0-1.el7.x86_64. I tried to use a program like
"menulibre" and "devedeng" and the developers say there is a bug in
gobject-instrospecition. Thanks for any help!
Hi,
As is the standard in open-source software, you can find the license
information in the COPYING file in the root directory of the source
distribution or Git repository:
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gobject-introspection/blob/master/COPYING
We do not have an ECCN number. Although I don't
to get ECCN details for product gobject-introspection
Version 1 :
Could you please provide us the ECCN number for this software
If you do not have your software classified with an ECCN, please
kindly answer the following questions so that we may self-assess if there may
be any
to get few details for product gobject-introspection
Version 1 :
1. Under which agreement it falls under: MIT , GPL or LPGL ?
2. Could you please provide us the ECCN number for this software
If you do not have your software classified with an ECCN, please
kindly answer
to get few details for product gobject-introspection
Version 1 :
1. Under which agreement it falls under: MIT , GPL or LPGL ?
2. Could you please provide us the ECCN number for this software
If you do not have your software classified with an ECCN, please
kindly answer
Thanks John,
I'll start using that (I have a feeling it used to be described differently
at https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK+/OSX/Building but now it's described
it's the way you said).
Best regards,
Jiri
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 9:01 PM, John Ralls wrote:
> You
Hi John,
I'd personally go for the second (simpler) option - building python as part
of bootstrapping. I've been using
jhbuild bootstrap && jhbuild build python && jhbuild build
meta-gtk-osx-bootstrap && jhbuild build meta-gtk-osx-core
for the last few releases of Geany and it works fine for
> On Sep 16, 2017, at 1:04 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
>
> Just check the backtrace from the first email - there's no C involved. The
> error message comes from
>
> /System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/lib/python2.7/distutils/spawn.py
>
> Jiri
>
> On Sat,
On Fri, 2017-09-29 at 04:45 +, Gergely Polonkai wrote:
> As a side note, STRING probably refers to https://developer.gnome.org
> /glib/stable/glib-Strings.html which is a more OO string
> implementation. G_TYPE_STRING being gchararray is of more close
> relation with C strings (except it
ues. For C we have the macros like G_TYPE_STRING which
> for my box gives currently value 64. These values seems to be not
> directly supported by gobject-introspection. Seems to be no big
> problem, we may query the values by g-type-from-name().
>
>
> https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/
gives currently value 64. These values seems to be not
directly supported by gobject-introspection. Seems to be no big
problem, we may query the values by g-type-from-name().
https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/stable/gobject-Type-Information.html#g-type-from-name
For G_TYPE_STRING I assumed that name
an icon name or %NULL
a stock icon size (#GtkIconSize)
So ctype is GtkIconSize, but due to name="gint" I get from gobject-
introspection only plain gint=int32. Unfortunately there ex
Just check the backtrace from the first email - there's no C involved. The
error message comes from
/System/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/2.7/
lib/python2.7/distutils/spawn.py
Jiri
On Sat, Sep 16, 2017 at 9:53 PM, John Ralls wrote:
>
> > On Sep 16, 2017, at
> On Sep 16, 2017, at 12:44 PM, Jiří Techet wrote:
>
> Hi John,
>
> at least from the backtrace it doesn't seem to happen when linking libpython
> but rather when running preprocess() from
>
> https://docs.python.org/2/distutils/apiref.html
Huh. That's odd, there's no
10:04 AM, Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi John,
> >
> > that's strange. I don't need python at all for the project myself and
> there's no need to bundle it - it's just used when building
> gobject-introspection. Simple
> >
> > jhbui
Hi John,
that's strange. I don't need python at all for the project myself and
there's no need to bundle it - it's just used when building
gobject-introspection. Simple
jhbuild bootstrap && jhbuild build meta-gtk-osx-bootstrap && jhbuild build
meta-gtk-osx-core
used to work fin
> On Sep 16, 2017, at 7:42 AM, Jiří Techet <tec...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I got the following error during jhbuild when compiling gobject-introspection:
>
> GISCAN GLib-2.0.gir
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "./g-ir-scanner"
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 10:28 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> All API that takes a GtkIconSize should have a `type int` annotation.
Thanks. I learned that already from the reply of Mr. Phil Clayton.
Seems that some functions like gtk_toolbar_set_icon_size() do not yet
have a `type int` annotation.
On 14 September 2017 at 21:12, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> GtkIconSize type is reported as plain gint, but it is an enum.
It's an "extensible" enumeration, like GtkResponseType for GtkDialog:
the API accepts an integer, because app and library developers can
register their own
On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 09:57 +0100, Phil Clayton wrote:
> Have a look at
> https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=601425
Great, thanks.
I had looked only into the list of gobject-introspection bugs mentioned
at the bottom of this page:
https://wiki.gnome.org/action/show/Pr
Hello,
I'm writting a decorator pattern for a protocol in Thrift that's based
on c_glib. One of the cases I found is that you can have this:
// From Thrift code:
/*!
* Thrift Protocol Decorator instance.
*/
struct _ThriftProtocolDecorator
{
ThriftProtocol parent;
ThriftProtocol
(#GtkIconSize)
So ctype is GtkIconSize, but due to name="gint" I get from gobject-
introspection only plain gint=int32. Unfortunately there exists a few
functions with that bug, and it is some work fixing it manually. I will
investigate if there is a way to get the ctype fr
On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 at 00:29, Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de> wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 21:46 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > Boxed types use g_boxed_free() to release resources, and
> > g_boxed_copy() to copy them:
> > https://developer.gnome.org/g
On Sat, 2017-09-09 at 21:46 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> Boxed types use g_boxed_free() to release resources, and
> g_boxed_copy() to copy them:
> https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/stable/gobject-Boxed-Types.html
>
> Ciao,
> Emmanuele.
Yes I know :-)
But from
https://d
Boxed types use g_boxed_free() to release resources, and g_boxed_copy() to
copy them:
https://developer.gnome.org/gobject/stable/gobject-Boxed-Types.html
Ciao,
Emmanuele.
On Sat, 9 Sep 2017 at 21:29, Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de> wrote:
> First
First I noticed that for pango_font_description_from_string()
>From /usr/share/gir-1.0/Pango-1.0.gir we know that transfer-
ownership="full" so we have to free it in our language bindings.
But how to guess the function for freeing?
For gobject there is generally a plain g
Hi,
Thanks to all!
In
If I ned to be backwards compatible, I go with GobGen (an Emacs package I
wrote, available on MELPA). If not, see ebassi’s answer.
On Mon, Sep 4, 2017, 16:46 Kouhei Sutou <k...@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to write common codes for GObject like the
> follo
use new macros if you don't need back compatibility
Il giorno lun 04 set 2017 16:03:55 CEST, Kouhei Sutou ha scritto:
Hi,
We need to write common codes for GObject like the
followings:
#define GTK_TYPE_WIDGET (gtk_widget_get_type ())
#define GTK_WIDGET(widget
On 4 September 2017 at 15:03, Kouhei Sutou <k...@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to write common codes for GObject like the
> followings:
>
> #define GTK_TYPE_WIDGET (gtk_widget_get_type ())
> #define GTK_WIDGET(widget)
Hi,
We need to write common codes for GObject like the
followings:
#define GTK_TYPE_WIDGET (gtk_widget_get_type ())
#define GTK_WIDGET(widget)(G_TYPE_CHECK_INSTANCE_CAST
((widget), GTK_TYPE_WIDGET, GtkWidget))
#define GTK_WIDGET_CLASS(klass
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 01:20:14PM +0200, Joël Krähemann wrote:
> The AgsApplicationContext acts as a base entry point to your
> application. It is an extensible singleton
> where functions are added by interfaces.
>
> In order to use libags-thread.so.0 you have to implement
>
gt; Can you describe a little those patterns? What are the intents?
>
>> But what GObject makes really special are it's properties and events.
>
> Yes for example the Observer design pattern is implemented in a simpler
> way with GObject signals. But the intent remains the same.
ee/ags/audio/ags_sound_provider.h
Can you describe a little those patterns? What are the intents?
> But what GObject makes really special are it's properties and events.
Yes for example the Observer design pattern is implemented in a simpler
way with GObject signals. But the in
ext-menu.c?h=1.5.3#n258
> At last, I take this opportunity to share my bookmark post on GObject. I
> collected all the interesting bits I found on the Net while learning
> from zero, plus added some personal thoughts, and in the end it's just a
> mess, but learners might find int
On 8/11/2017 5:16 AM, Arnaud wrote:
> Hi Sébastien,
>
> thx for this post ! I'm a newby with GObject, and I'm always happy to
> learn bits here and there.
>
> As for using the `g_object_set_data()` like you do, it's something I
> always tried to stay away from, b
/gsequencer.git/tree/ags/X/ags_xorg_application_context.h
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/tree/ags/thread/ags_concurrency_provider.h
http://git.savannah.nongnu.org/cgit/gsequencer.git/tree/ags/audio/ags_sound_provider.h
But what GObject makes really special are it's properties and events
Hi,
I've documented my first GObject design pattern:
https://blogs.gnome.org/swilmet/2017/08/09/gobject-design-pattern-attached-class-extension/
Question to the old-timers: do you know any other GObject-specific
design pattern? Not applying the classic design patterns with GObject,
I'm talking
and install the
latest unstable (2.53.x) version of GLib (make sure that you don't try
to overwrite the GLib that your package manager provides, so you install
it in a private location such as $HOME/gnome.build.unstable), and then
when you build gobject-introspection, you need to prepend your
On Tue, 2017-08-08 at 16:19 +0200, Andy wrote:
> I call ./autogen.sh
> I have error:
> configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.53.5) were not
> met:
>
> No package 'glib-2.0' found
>
> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
> installed software in a
I call ./autogen.sh
I have error:
configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 >= 2.53.5) were not met:
No package 'glib-2.0' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installed software in a non-standard prefix.
Alternatively, you may set the environment
On Sat, 2017-07-15 at 18:21 +0200, Nicola Fontana wrote:
> They have been included in gobject-introspection 1.53.2, released
> on may:
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/gobject-introspection/log/
Fine.
My Gentoo box has still
dev-libs/glib-2.50.3-r1:2::gentoo
I will try to grab
ke to have that upstream.
> >
> > Ciao.
>
> Is it already known when these patches will be available for ordinary
> users?
> ...
They have been included in gobject-introspection 1.53.2, released
on may:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gobject-introspection/log/
Ciao.
--
Nicola
__
On Tue, 2017-05-09 at 17:05 +0200, Nicola Fontana wrote:
> Il Tue, 09 May 2017 16:39:10 +0200 Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de
> > scrisse:
>
> > I am currently working again on the gobject introspection based
> > bindings for Nim language (https://githu
can gtk-doc and gobject-introspection be used for a library that don't
have gobjects?
i have a library that is only a set of utility functions (that use
glib/gtk/etc): can i use gtk-doc and/or gobject-introspection?
thanks in advance
___
gtk-list
Hi Link,
My understanding is that the private string gets setup in
my_object_class_init(). Then in my_object_init() you can initialize it to a
default value. After that, you can set a new string value using a property set
accessor function that can validate the string and/or you can use CSS
I have a GObject.
struct _MyObject
{
gchar *foo;
};
I set a string property in my class_init with g_param_spec_string. I
set the property->cset_nth to a string of valid characters
("abc...xyz").
static void
my_object_class_init (MyObjectClass *klass)
{
GParamSpec
Hi,
I am a fun of python and gtk, I want to port gobject-introspection
to windows, the current manul update VS project make upstream a little
hard.
Will gobect-introspection migrate to a modern and cross platform
friendly solution like cmake or meason in the near future?
And when
Il Tue, 09 May 2017 16:39:10 +0200 Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de> scrisse:
> I am currently working again on the gobject introspection based
> bindings for Nim language (https://github.com/StefanSalewski/nim-gi).
>
> And I wonder why there is only minimal support for cai
On 9 May 2017 at 15:39, Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de> wrote:
> I am currently working again on the gobject introspection based
> bindings for Nim language (https://github.com/StefanSalewski/nim-gi).
>
> And I wonder why there is only minimal support for cairo --
> /us
I am currently working again on the gobject introspection based
bindings for Nim language (https://github.com/StefanSalewski/nim-gi).
And I wonder why there is only minimal support for cairo --
/usr/share/gir-1.0/cairo-1.0.gir is minimal.
Of course cairo is not gobject based
ox, I
thought I was doing something wrong.
But it is already reported in bug696935 -- one of 283 open bugs.
But in spite of that, gobject introspection seems to be a very useful
tool. Rust people seems to use it too.
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.o
On 13 February 2017 at 11:19, Stefan Salewski <m...@ssalewski.de> wrote:
> Is gobject-introspection unmaintained?
It's not heavily maintained, but it's not unmaintained either.
> I found a github reposity at
>
> https://github.com/GNOME/gobject-introspection
The GitHub
Is gobject-introspection unmaintained?
I found a github reposity at
https://github.com/GNOME/gobject-introspection
but the issue tracker is disabled.
As you may know, I have done some work on a higher level GTK Nim
wrapper recently. Starting with the API docs
https://developer.gnome.org/gi
https://developer.gnome.org/gi/1.50/gi-GIFieldInfo.html#g-field-info-get-size
Is someone still familiar with GObject Introspection?
I am investigating creating high level GObject Introspection based Nim bindings.
Most seems to work well, some not: For example
g-field-info-get-size()
seems
e great references.
>
> That's the rub: writing down what the boilerplate code is means that
> we commit to it for all eternity — or, at least, until a major API
> break.
>
> The whole idea of using the macros is not just to avoid the
> boilerplate: is to make it irrelevant to know
, at least, until a major API
break.
The whole idea of using the macros is not just to avoid the
boilerplate: is to make it irrelevant to know what the boilerplate
does, unless you're literally hacking on the type system itself.
Given that GObject is mostly based on conventions more than API,
> >
> > The referenced docs are good but only up to a point.
>
> Patches are very welcome; we recently landed a whole review of the
> GObject tutorial, and feedback helps improving the documentation.
>
> >
> > Their seems to be two methods used A) one
Hi;
you should probably try and keep the thread, instead of breaking with
every new email.
On 20 October 2016 at 11:32, Timothy Ward <gtwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The referenced docs are good but only up to a point.
Patches are very welcome; we recently landed a whole review of th
.
Gobject destruction is not fully described as when object dispose
and object finalize should be used for an given Gobjects destruction
and examples of correct use.
Regards
Tim
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:41 AM, Timothy Ward <gtwa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is there a good tutorial or reference material on gtk gobject "c"
> coding.
>
> 1) Explaining in detail the whole process from what should be in
> header files and source files, structure de
Il Thu, 13 Oct 2016 01:41:03 +1100 Timothy Ward <gtwa...@gmail.com> scrisse:
> Is there a good tutorial or reference material on gtk gobject "c"
> coding.
>
> 1) Explaining in detail the whole process from what should be in
> header files and source files, struc
Is there a good tutorial or reference material on gtk gobject "c"
coding.
1) Explaining in detail the whole process from what should be in
header files and source files, structure declarations, boiler plate
code the stages of object creation and dispose and finalize functions.
What eac
On 03/08/2016 23:07, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Care to file a bug with a link to this thread?
I'll try to come up with a patch for all the cases of this macro
exploiting undefined behaviour.
Thanks, I just filed bug #769504:-
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=769504
I'm not sure if
Hi;
On 3 August 2016 at 19:35, John Emmas wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 18:46, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
>>
>> This is likely a MSVC 8 issue. The GOBJECT_IF_DEBUG macro expands the
>> second argument to a code block, and it seems MSVC 8 has issues when
>> that includes a conditional
was pushed/pulled into the
repo.
https://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/gobject/gobject.c?id=42dad59cc10c5b44fac23e93004b17baeb750500
shows the author wrote the code on 2014-05-25, but it wasn't integrated
until 2016-07-17.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersm...@oracle.com
The confusion is arising from the fact that the working code is in 2.48
https://github.com/GNOME/glib/blob/glib-2-48/gobject/gobject.c#L398-L406
The non-working code is in master.
On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 11:35 AM, John Emmas <john...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> On 03/08/2016 18:46, Emmanu
On 03/08/2016 18:46, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
This is likely a MSVC 8 issue. The GOBJECT_IF_DEBUG macro expands the
second argument to a code block, and it seems MSVC 8 has issues when
that includes a conditional pre-processor directive.
GOBJECT_IF_DEBUG hasn't changed since 2014, and the same
t 2016 at 18:36, John Emmas <john...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
>> Hi there - I just came across a problem after updating libglib to the latest
>> git master (my last update was about a fortnight ago).
>>
>> I'm building with MSVC 8 and when I try to compile 'gobject/go
Hi;
On 3 August 2016 at 18:36, John Emmas <john...@tiscali.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi there - I just came across a problem after updating libglib to the latest
> git master (my last update was about a fortnight ago).
>
> I'm building with MSVC 8 and when I try to compile 'gobject/gobjec
Hi there - I just came across a problem after updating libglib to the
latest git master (my last update was about a fortnight ago).
I'm building with MSVC 8 and when I try to compile 'gobject/gobject.c'
the Release version compiles fine but compiling in Debug mode gives me
an error around
> On Jun 3, 2016, at 5:07 AM, Esteban Fuentes wrote:
>
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am trying to install gtk+ on OSX following the instructions in:
>
> https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GTK%2B/OSX/Building
>
> I get this error:
>
> dyld: lazy symbol binding failed: Symbol not
Hi,
On Tue, 2016-04-05 at 19:09 +0530, Krishnamoney Elayath wrote:
> I am new to open source community and I would like to push the
> following changes to the gobject introspection. What would be the
> steps to do this
>
> girepository/gitypelib.c
>
> #de
Hi
I am new to open source community and I would like to push the following
changes to the gobject introspection. What would be the steps to do this
girepository/gitypelib.c
#define MAX_NAME_LEN 255 <-- this is currently 200 which is not sufficient
while using
introspection al
he:36503888): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: gtype.c:2722: You
forgot to call g_type_init()
(process:36503888): GLib-CRITICAL **: file gthread.c: line 713: assertion
`result != 0' failed
(gtk-update-icon-cache:36503888): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: file gobject.c:
line 1547: assertion `G_TYPE_IS_OBJECT (
Greetings,
I recently tried to compile gobject-introspection 1.44 using glib 2.44.1.
I encountered several issues along the way that I was hoping others
might be able to help me understand.
First, during the build process when it attempts to use g-ir-scanner for
gobject-introspection-1.44.0
Il Thu, 22 Jan 2015 09:50:00 -0800 Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
scrisse:
Cairo-GObject provides access to enums, but it won't automatically get you
great cairo bindings. It might actually get you 90% of the way there,
though, and I'd be interested seeing how far you can run
hi;
On 22 January 2015 at 16:13, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
I need introspection access to a type actually not exported in
cairo-1.0.gir, and in fact that gir file exports only a fraction of the
types available.
Cairo is not a GObject library, so introspection is fairly useless
://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686107
[2] https://github.com/GNOME/gobject-introspection/pull/1
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Il Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:28:19 + Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
if you have patches, please attach them on Bugzilla.
Patches attached to bug #743364:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743364
Ciao.
--
Nicola
___
gtk-devel-list
Il Thu, 22 Jan 2015 16:28:19 + Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
Cairo is not a GObject library, so introspection is fairly useless.
Hi Emmanuele,
the cairo source tree includes cairo-gobject [1] that already wraps
enums and structs in GObject style. I just browsed the code
Cairo-GObject provides access to enums, but it won't automatically get you
great cairo bindings. It might actually get you 90% of the way there,
though, and I'd be interested seeing how far you can run with just that,
and be happy to merge patches that make it easier.
Why? cairo has a subtype
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014, at 08:48 AM, LiRongQing wrote:
Hi:
I want to compile gobject-introspection for arm cpu in x86
host,
The compilation failed since g-ir-compiler(compiled for arm)
can not
run on x86.
See:
[1]https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592311
Could you tell me
Hi:
I want to compile gobject-introspection for arm cpu in x86 host,
The compilation failed since g-ir-compiler(compiled for arm) can not
run on x86.
Could you tell me if it supports the cross-compile, if not, what
should I do to enable it? like using the host's g-ir-compiler to work
1 - 100 of 867 matches
Mail list logo