On Nov 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
More importantly even, the loop will also automatically map
over any new API we add to Pango, thus indirectly changing
Gtk2's API. Is it better to hardcode the stuff that
On Nov 1, 2008, at 2:21 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
muppet wrote:
The obvious scenario that comes to mind is a hosed registration
order. Is there any value in worrying about deferred
initialization? I don't think so, as you're typically doing
instantiation after initialization has
On Thu, 08 Nov 2007 14:04:11 +0800
Ye Wenbin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The add_watch function seem not work in Windows. I test using
this script:
use Gtk2 '-init';
use Glib qw/FALSE TRUE/;
Glib::IO-add_watch(
fileno(STDIN),
'in',
\callback,
\*STDIN,
);
Gtk2-main;
sub
On Nov 1, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
Torsten Schoenfeld wrote:
package Foo;
use Glib::Object::Subclass
'Glib::Object',
interfaces = [ 'Gtk2::CellLayout' ];
use Gtk2;
By the way: with the patch applied, this warning is printed:
encountered unregistered interface
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, muppet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: muppet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Standalone Pango, take two
To: gtk-perl-list@gnome.org List gtk-perl-list@gnome.org
Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008, 8:30 AM
On Nov 2, 2008, at 11:16 AM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
--- On Sun,
Sergei Steshenko wrote:
I think the safest approach is to export/map _nothing_.
If one needs method/data, he/she should explicitly prefix it with
package name.
I think you're confusing something here. We are not talking about exporting
symbols into the user's namespace. Gtk2 never did that
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Standalone Pango, take two
To: gtk-perl-list@gnome.org
Date: Sunday, November 2, 2008, 9:23 AM
Sergei Steshenko wrote:
I think the safest approach is to export/map
On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
--- On Sun, 11/2/08, Torsten Schoenfeld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sergei Steshenko wrote:
I think the safest approach is to export/map
_nothing_.
If one needs method/data, he/she should explicitly
prefix it with
package name.
I think
