On 2013-09-24 16:08, Ben Gamari wrote:
> Thanks for this reference. That indeed confirms my suspicion. That
> being
> said, why the "-0" suffix for the Gtk+ 2 Cabal file?
No good reason. I suspect you should think of it like the "nought" in
math texts -- this was the original, -3 is the modified
Daniel Wagner writes:
> It's a good idea. I believe the problem I had when I tried it last was
> that cabal doesn't like ".." as part of an hs-source-dirs directive.
> But my memory is a bit fuzzy.
Hmmm, that could be problematic. I'll look into this.
> After I have a look at the various cabal
It's a good idea. I believe the problem I had when I tried it last was
that cabal doesn't like ".." as part of an hs-source-dirs directive. But
my memory is a bit fuzzy. After I have a look at the various cabal-1.18
patches floating around it seems like a good thing to think about.
Of course, t
Since Daniel Wagner's patch[1] from 11 July 2012, gtk/gtk.cabal in the
gtk2hs repository declares the package name to be gtk3. This is a fine
approach to take for differentiating the Gtk3 bindings from their Gtk2
counterparts but the implementation needs to be finished.
In addition to editing gtk
