RE: gear (not for the archives--fluff)

2000-09-08 Thread Henry S. Winokur
> The injuries were as expected for gearless riders. One woman was dead > before I stopped the truck--massive head injuries. The guy had by all > appearances a broken back. The other woman had severe road rash, was > going into shock in a major way, and concerned me for internal injuries. > The

Re: gear (not for the archives--fluff)

2000-09-08 Thread fred schneider
I, myself alway use protective clothing and in general don't think it should be a law to wear it because I think the freedom we have becomes less and less. If every risk is arranged by law, in a couple off years we are not allowed to sport, drive or come outside anymore. But on the other hand the

Re: gear (not for the archives--fluff)

2000-09-06 Thread Michel Bijl
ne is complaining about that? - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Multiple recipients of list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2000 9:39 PM Subject: gear (not for the archives--fluff) > > Folks, > > I was maintaining my silence, until I rea

gear (not for the archives--fluff)

2000-09-05 Thread pbenson
Folks, I was maintaining my silence, until I read Shawn's comment from Monday. I'll keep it short, and minimize the unpleasantries.but feel free to hit the delete key now. On Mon, 4 Sep 2000, SHAWN PEARSALL wrote: > Have fun...ride safely guys and galsout of towners this weekend had