On Wed 30 Mar 2011 06:50, Mike Gran writes:
> GC_allow_register_threads is not present in earlier versions of BDW-GC
> * configure.ac: check for GC_allow_register_threads
> * libguile/gen-scmconfig.c (SCM_HAVE_GC_ALLOW_REGISTER_THREADS): new define
> * libguile/threads.c (scm_i_init_thread_for_gu
Hi Andy,
> Fixed, I believe. Please let me know if you can still reproduce the
> problem.
My build is successful now, thanks for the prompt action!
After the mail from nalaginrut I tried switching to
bdwgc-7_2alpha5-20110107 but as expected this did not help with the last
error. To keep my o
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Wed 23 Mar 2011 00:20, Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> In porting dorodango[0], I have noticed that Guile's R6RS fixnum
>> operations are quite slow; here's a patch to remedy that a bit.
>
> What is the state of things here? I'm a bit lost in the discussion :)
>
> You said
[ Sorry for the incomplete mail I just sent; hit the wrong key combo ]
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Wed 23 Mar 2011 00:20, Andreas Rottmann writes:
>
>> In porting dorodango[0], I have noticed that Guile's R6RS fixnum
>> operations are quite slow; here's a patch to remedy that a bit.
>
> What is th
On Sat 19 Mar 2011 15:06, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Let me ask you this: why would you oppose changing the scm_c_ functions
> to use UTF-8 by default? If you're comfortable with ASCII-only names,
> then UTF-8 will work fine for you, since ASCII strings are unchanged in
> UTF-8.
This is true. Wel
Hi Mark!
I think UTF-8 could be a good plan for 2.1/2.2, but I wanted to make
sure we understand what string-ref is good for...
On Sat 12 Mar 2011 00:09, Mark H Weaver writes:
> I claim that any reasonable code which currently uses string-ref and
> string-set! could be more cleanly written usin
Hello!
On Fri 25 Mar 2011 17:45, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 25 Mar 2011 02:52, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> I have pushed something that causes the stack to be unwound before
>>> exiting.
>>
>> | GENguile-procedures.texi
>> | guile: uncaught throw to wrong-type-arg
On Sun 20 Mar 2011 23:12, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> For 2.1.x, things are different. I’m happy to revisit not only the
> internal storage approach but also the O(1) ref/set! (the latter should
> be discussed in light of the trend in other Schemes, though.)
[...]
> Again, if you w
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 22:50, Neil Jerram writes:
> - "gel" is short; and it's the name of Guile before it was Guile; and
> suggests sticking things together; and AFAIK isn't already being used
> for anything else; and has similar key positions as "gdo", so is
> equally easy to type.
Gel is go
Howdy,
On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
>
> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
OK, point taken. Too bad though!
I have another proposal, but first I want to elaborate on why I think
guile-tools is a silly name.
On Tue 15 Mar 2011 23:49, Mark H Weaver writes:
>> Well, we covered O(1) vs O(n). To make UTF-8 O(1), you need to store
>> additional indexing information of some sort. There are various schemes,
>> but, depending the the scheme, you lose some of memory advantage of UTF-8
>> vs UTF-32. You can
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 05:05, Mark H Weaver writes:
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> I also think strings should remain what they currently are, with O(1)
>> random access.
>
> I just realized that it is possible to implement O(1) accessors for
> UTF-8 backed strings.
If we switch to UTF-
On Sun 13 Mar 2011 22:30, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> So yes, the current implementation has bugs, but I think most if not all
> can be fixed with minimal changes. Would you like to look into it
> for 2.0.x?
I very much agree with this sentiment for 2.0.x. Let's not let the
perfect
The coolness is irrefutable. :-)
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>>> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
>>
>> Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> OK, point taken. Too bad though!
> Howdy,
>
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 00:16, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
> > Andy Wingo writes:
> >
> >> "Guido, compile my-file.scm."
> >
> > Is the pun[*] intended? :-)
>
> OK, point taken. Too bad though!
>
> I have another proposal, but first I want to elaborate on why I think
> g
On Sun 30 Jan 2011 23:46, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> The problem is that each ‘make-pointer’ call (and ‘dereference-pointer’,
> etc.) conses. This can make conversion to/from C quite inefficient.
We could simply allow Scheme integers to work as pointers. It's not
very nice though.
Hello Guilers of the Guild!
Andy Wingo writes:
> So! My new proposal is "guild".
[...]
> But that doesn't mention the real advantage of "guild", which is how you
> feel when you type it or tell it to someone: that you pertain to a
> secret society of wizards! Who wouldn't want to pertain to
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 28 Mar 2011 22:40, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
1. Disable pthread redirects and instead register threads explicitly
(in ‘scm_with_guile’).
>>>
>>> Why is this only applicable to 2.1 ?
>>
>> I was thinking it’d break the ABI, but ma
Hi!
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 18:15, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello!
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> On Mon 28 Mar 2011 22:40, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>>
> 1. Disable pthread redirects and instead register threads explicitly
> (in ‘scm_with_guile’).
> OK,
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 17:52, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello Guilers of the Guild!
Haha! Hello, Guiler of the Guild!
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> So! My new proposal is "guild".
>
> [...]
>
>> But that doesn't mention the real advantage of "guild", which is how you
>> feel when you ty
Andy Wingo writes:
> So! My new proposal is "guild".
>
> guild update
> guild compile foo.scm
> guild install fmt
Yes, that's nice.
Neil
Andy Wingo writes:
> On Mon 21 Mar 2011 22:50, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> - "gel" is short; and it's the name of Guile before it was Guile; and
>> suggests sticking things together; and AFAIK isn't already being used
>> for anything else; and has similar key positions as "gdo", so is
>> equa
Andy Wingo writes:
>>> | GENguile-procedures.texi
>>> | guile: uncaught throw to wrong-type-arg: (#f Wrong type (expecting ~A):
>>> ~S (exact integer (#t # #))
>>> ((#t # #)))
>
> This, it turns out, was something more pernicious, fixed in
> 572eef50c2d902d34427945dd504ba03af666e48.
Than
[sorry, this should of course have been CC'd to the list too...]
Hi Andy,
I saw this change and couldn't fully understand it. Given that you
ended up adding GC_disable() and GC_enable() around the GC_malloc()
call, couldn't you just have done that without all the other changes
from "t->" to "t."
- Original Message -
> From:Neil Jerram
> To:Andy Wingo
> Cc:bug-gu...@gnu.org; Ian Price ; guile-devel
>
> Sent:Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:31 AM
> Subject:Re: exit & dynamic wind
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
> >>> | GEN guile-procedures.texi
> >>> | guile: uncaught throw to wron
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 20:31, Neil Jerram writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
| GENguile-procedures.texi
| guile: uncaught throw to wrong-type-arg: (#f Wrong type (expecting ~A):
~S (exact integer (#t # #))
((#t # #)))
>>
>> This, it turns out, was something more pernicious, f
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 21:06, Mike Gran writes:
> - Original Message -
>> From:Neil Jerram
>> To:Andy Wingo
>> Cc:bug-gu...@gnu.org; Ian Price ; guile-devel
>>
>> Sent:Wednesday, March 30, 2011 11:31 AM
>> Subject:Re: exit & dynamic wind
>>
>> Andy Wingo writes:
>>
>> >>> | GEN gui
Hi Neil!
Adding guile-devel; I'm wrong a lot lately, and folks should know ;-)
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 21:11, Neil Jerram writes:
> I saw this change and couldn't fully understand it. Given that you
> ended up adding GC_disable() and GC_enable() around the GC_malloc()
> call, couldn't you just have
On Wed 30 Mar 2011 23:25, Andy Wingo writes:
> We didn't see this issue before because compiling eval.scm did not cause
> a `throw'. Interesting, no? But since I changed the implementation of
> ensure-writable-dir to one that probably throws, we see this error.
Sorry, forgot to mention somethi
Andy Wingo writes:
> As for explanations... Catch and throw are implemented using fluids and
> prompt and abort. (A discussion of that is here:
> http://wingolog.org/archives/2010/02/14/sidelong-glimpses .) An abort
> can pass arguments to the prompt's abort handler. It does so by pushing
> th
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi Neil!
>
> Adding guile-devel; I'm wrong a lot lately, and folks should know ;-)
>
> On Wed 30 Mar 2011 21:11, Neil Jerram writes:
>
>> I saw this change and couldn't fully understand it. Given that you
>> ended up adding GC_disable() and GC_enable() around the GC_malloc(
Hi there...
I think I've successfully cross-compiled Guile (stable-2.0, e309f3bf9e)
for my Freerunner phone. However, when I run it, it just keeps
allocating memory until the OOM killer kills it:
root@om-gta02 ~ # guile -c 3
Killed
root@om-gta02 ~ # guile
Killed
and if I strace it, the log ends
Hi,
having a all new shiny, I wanted to do some random tests with it and
turned to Andys sqlite3 bindings[1]. Compiling and installing worked
like a breeze but I'm having some beginners trouble.
Looking into sqlite3.scm I gather that the following session should
open up a connection to my "mydb"
> Hi there...
>
> I think I've successfully cross-compiled Guile (stable-2.0, e309f3bf9e)
> for my Freerunner phone. However, when I run it, it just keeps
> allocating memory until the OOM killer kills it:
>
> root@om-gta02 ~ # guile -c 3
> Killed
> root@om-gta02 ~ # guile
> Killed
>
> and if I
Hello,
I'm no expert on what the project needs done, but I noticed your email
has been sitting for a few days with no reply. Have you been talking
to people on IRC?
Noah
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Diogo F. S. Ramos wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> I've been following some discussions about
Noah Lavine writes:
> Hello,
Hi!
> I'm no expert on what the project needs done, but I noticed your email
> has been sitting for a few days with no reply. Have you been talking
> to people on IRC?
Not since the e-mail. I'm still waiting for feedback.
--
Diogo F. S. Ramos
Hi-
dynamic-pointer relies on lt_dlerror for its error message, and that
procedure can return the unhelpful string "No Error" when lt_dlsym
fails to find a symbol. You might fix it like I did in the following
patch.
Thanks,
Mike
0001-More-descriptive-error-for-dynamic-pointer.patch
Descript
> Not since the e-mail. I'm still waiting for feedback.
I will tell you what I think, then, but keep in mind that many people
on this list know a lot more than I do.
The first idea is something I think Guile people are very interested
in, and you could expect to do significant work, possibly havi
38 matches
Mail list logo
