Hello,
I was just working on a project that used (ice-9 q), and I found that
I needed to append two queues. I wrote the following functions to do
it. What do you think of including them in (ice-9 q)? It's pretty
simple, but it seems like a natural part of the queue interface. I've
included destruc
Noah Lavine writes:
> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of
> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that
> we want the functions in (ice-9 q).
I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
the lack of a distinct type,
Hello,
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Ian Price wrote:
>
> I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names, and
> the lack of a distinct type, less than satisfactory.
>
Fair enough. I'd be just as happy to implement a new queue container. I
think we need to keep (ice-9 q) around f
Hi,
Ian Price skribis:
> Noah Lavine writes:
>
>> The only change I was considering is allowing an arbitrary number of
>> arguments, but that's something I can implement if people agree that
>> we want the functions in (ice-9 q).
>
> I'm loath to add anything to (ice-9 q) since I find the names
