Le 23/02/2016 à 17:57, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :
So, to summarize the things I can change:
- Add the path to the installed package in guild show or list-packages
- Add a dynamical site as repository
- Package guix features
- Package guildhall in guix
And things I can’t change easily
Le 01/03/2017 à 20:35, Amirouche a écrit :
Le 23/02/2016 à 17:57, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :
That said I have an issue with registration/login
stuff anything related with setting cookies I don't find a good
abstraction,
for it.
I keep you posted.
So I found a solution that satisfy me.
Le 23/02/2016 à 17:57, Arne Babenhauserheide a écrit :
So, to summarize the things I can change:
- Add the path to the installed package in guild show or list-packages
- Add a dynamical site as repository
- Package guix features
- Package guildhall in guix
And things I can’t change easily
So, to summarize the things I can change:
- Add the path to the installed package in guild show or list-packages
- Add a dynamical site as repository
- Package guix features
- Package guildhall in guix
And things I can’t change easily:
- Package many packages (I hope a site with easy uploads
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>
>>> - Add the path to the installed package in guild show or
>>> list-packages
>> First experience: It takes quite some time to get into guildhall — much
>> longer than I expected. I spend
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>> - Add the path to the installed package in guild show or
>> list-packages
> First experience: It takes quite some time to get into guildhall — much
> longer than I expected. I spend most of the time finding out how to
> extract
> - Add the path to the installed package in guild show or
> list-packages
First experience: It takes quite some time to get into guildhall — much
longer than I expected. I spend most of the time finding out how to
extract information from its datastructures.
Best wishes,
Arne
Hi,
In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion
> I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your
> needs.
I finished my PhD last month, so I have some freed-up time — and I would
like to use some of it to hack on Guildhall and make it rea
Hi Arne!
2016-02-22 16:08 GMT+01:00 Arne Babenhauserheide :
> Hi,
>
> In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion
>
> > I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your
> > needs.
>
> I finished my PhD last month, so I h
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Please tell me what’s missing in Guildhall, so I can implement it.
I would like every interesting Guile package as it is right now either
in Guildhall or packaged with Guile core.
Most notably, I would very much like to have something like the
functionality
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
> In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion
>
>> I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your
>> needs.
>
> I finished my PhD last month, so I have some freed-up time — and I wou
x27;s better to show it's
module path in the information.
It's unreasonable to force users to download and read the src.
I think this feature could be put either "list-packages" or "show"
command.
Best regards.
On Mon, 2016-02-22 at 16:08 +0100, Arne Babenhauserheid
Hi,
In january there was a thread here about Guildhall with the notion
> I encourage you to hack on Guildhall to make it more usable for your
> needs.
I finished my PhD last month, so I have some freed-up time — and I would
like to use some of it to hack on Guildhall and make it rea
o this?
>
>
Yes, but do we have some kind of spec standard for guildhall packages?
If answer is no, I'll do some post-work before the policy discussion.
And another related question bothered me for a long time: which is
guildhall's upstream
repo now? ijp's? or andy's?
I thin
On Tue 22 Jan 2013 16:24, Nala Ginrut writes:
> Yes, but do we have some kind of spec standard for guildhall packages?
The zip bundles, no? The guild tool should create the bundles.
I had another thought. When someone submits a bundle, they should HTTP
POST it to a URL on guildhall.gnu.
w package, they mail
bug-gu...@gnu.org with the information, creating a ticket.
We will have a GPG keyring for guildhall maintainers. We can rig up
some special email account, perhaps at gnu.org, to queue jobs for the
guildhall. Guildhall maintainers can then queue the addition or update
of a packag
their favorite to maintain
their works, and submit the package to guildhall repository.
IMO, a guildhall package must pass these two steps:
1. Package verify policy (PVP)
The rules to verify if package is valid/invalid.
And the package info specification. Include version-convention &
name-convention.
systems in general?
As for documentation, it's the same deal (almost). Guildhall currently
recognises four "categories" of file. libraries, programs[1],
documentation, and man, and each of these gets stored in a different
place in the users .local[0] directory corresponding to normal unix
Hello,
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Ian Price skribis:
>> If you think was a useful email, I can post a periodic update on new
>> packages and/or provide an atom feed for them. If not, I'll shut up :)
>
> I like the updates, keep up the good work! :-)
I also apprec
Hi Ian!
Ian Price skribis:
> This is just a quick update on the progress of that, and a small
> enticement to try to convince you to test it out[1]. Remember linus's
> law, "given enough eyeballs all bugs are shallow" :P
>
> Currently packaged is:
Woow, excellent work! FWIW, I was able to “gui
Hello all,
As some of you are aware, I am in the process of packaging pieces of
software for a repository to be used with the guildhall package
manager for guile 2[0].
This is just a quick update on the progress of that, and a small
enticement to try to convince you to test it out[1]. Remember
Hi,
For those of you using guildhall, I've set up a new repository on my
website. There isn't much there now, but I'll be looking into packaging
and uploading more code as time goes on.
To get started with guildhall, please follow the instructions in
https://gist.github.com/
Ian Price writes:
> Just an FYI, it still isn't up. :-P I know nalaginrut already offered,
> but if you can tell me where to find the available.scm format I can look
> into hosting this temporarily myself.
Oh I see, it is just a list of package forms (as in pkg-list.scm), but
with a location pro
I moved the site onto
> the new host.
Just an FYI, it still isn't up. :-P I know nalaginrut already offered,
but if you can tell me where to find the available.scm format I can look
into hosting this temporarily myself.
>> I think this may let us test guildhall till it real
27;s some trouble with his site to put guildhall package
> repository, I can provide a temporary repository from my web host.
>
I think there is a misunderstanding here: guildhall is a (friendly) fork
of dorodango; it's not yet clear if and how repositories would be shared
between dorodan
OK, if there's no anyone interested in it, I'll take it.
Guildhall is very important for building more powerful Guile community.
I wish it wake up soon. At least we can do some test then contribute to it.
On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri 04 May 2012 10:25
On Fri 04 May 2012 10:25, Nala Ginrut writes:
> http://rotty.yi.org/doro/experimental is unavailable for me. And ijp
> said it's the same for him.
> But Rottmann's site is OK.
> Well, if there's some trouble with his site to put guildhall package
> reposit
http://rotty.yi.org/doro/experimental is unavailable for me. And ijp
said it's the same for him.
But Rottmann's site is OK.
Well, if there's some trouble with his site to put guildhall package
repository, I can provide a temporary repository from my web host.
I think this may let us
--
> for code, I am very, very happy to accept merge requests on the
> guildhall project on gitorious, or patches on this mailing list.
> Collaboration on sysadmin things is also possible: send me the code and
> I'll put it up on guildhall.gnu.org.
>
>
I received a reply from m
Hi Simon,
On Tue 15 Nov 2011 23:52, Simon Haines writes:
> I'd like to start looking into getting some of my libraries ready for
> the guildhall, and have a few quick questions.
>
> How are library namespaces going to be determined? I can see a couple of
> approaches:
Hi!
Sorry for the terrible delay here.
On Sun 04 Sep 2011 07:33, Ian Price writes:
> Nala Ginrut writes:
>
>> hi guys!
>> I realized there're two problems in our shinning Guildhall.
>>
>> 1. When "http-download" calls "relative-uri"
Happy new year, guilers!
Hope all is well with yall. I have been looking at the guildhall
recently. To recap, the guildhall is a CPAN-alike for Guile. It adds
commands onto Guile's `guild' multitool, like `guild update' and `guild
install'.
In my last update[0], I annou
eal issue for this problem since
there're less people here using Ubuntu. Moreover, few
Chinese guilers here too. So I haven't collected sufficient information to
determine what's going on.
Anyway, I think I can provide a way to help Chinese guilers to fix the
"guildhall update hal
Hello Nala :)
On Tue 16 Aug 2011 10:16, Andy Wingo writes:
> On Tue 16 Aug 2011 06:15, Nala Ginrut writes:
>
>> well, I think the network module of Guile uses iso-8859-1 to handle data
>> for some reasons. And my problem is Ubuntu chinese version doesn't have
>> iso-8859-1 installed. And I add
Hello,
I am certainly not an authoritative source, but it's been a while, so
here is what I know. As far as I can tell, these questions haven't
been decided yet. All we know is that we want a guildhall.
However, having your packages in it would be great, so please do
package t
I'd like to start looking into getting some of my libraries ready for the
guildhall, and have a few quick questions.
How are library namespaces going to be determined? I can see a couple of
approaches:
a) authoritative (contributors apply to a central authority for a namespace
upon li
Nala Ginrut writes:
> hi guys!
> I realized there're two problems in our shinning Guildhall.
>
> 1. When "http-download" calls "relative-uri", the first arg should be a
> string, say "srfi", but ("srfi").
I don't see a reply
Well ,maybe I did a bad describe. I believe all locale was installed, but
some are not activated.
# cat /var/lib/locales/supported.d/local
zh_CN.UTF-8 UTF-8
en_US.UTF-8 UTF-8
And I add a line to this file:
en_US.ISO-8859-1 ISO-8859-1
then it's OK.
On Tue 16 Aug 2011 06:15, Nala Ginrut writes:
> well, I think the network module of Guile uses iso-8859-1 to handle data
> for some reasons. And my problem is Ubuntu chinese version doesn't have
> iso-8859-1 installed. And I add it manually, so the connection
> of Guile is OK now.
I am unclear a
well, I think the network module of Guile uses iso-8859-1 to handle data for
some reasons. And my problem is Ubuntu chinese version doesn't have
iso-8859-1 installed. And I add it manually, so the connection of Guile is
OK now.
Hi nalaginrut,
On Thu 21 Jul 2011 04:02, nalaginrut writes:
> >cut<
> ^_^[nalaginrut@Renee-desktop:guildhall]$ LANG=C
> ^_^[nalaginrut@Renee-desktop:guildhall]$ guild hall update
> Fetching http://rotty.yi.org/doro/experimental/available.sc
hi guys!
I realized there're two problems in our shinning Guildhall.
1. When "http-download" calls "relative-uri", the first arg should be a
string, say "srfi", but ("srfi").
2. I can install single package perfectly, but if there're several
de
d they do seem to be able to host a VM for us, so
> we will probably use the FSF.
>
> But beyond hosting the bundles and available.scm, I am still not clear
> on what guildhall.gnu.org should offer. It should probably have a
> facility for submitting packages, along with a GPG key
do seem to be able to host a VM for us, so
we will probably use the FSF.
But beyond hosting the bundles and available.scm, I am still not clear
on what guildhall.gnu.org should offer. It should probably have a
facility for submitting packages, along with a GPG keyring. Perhaps it
should run tes
s in about 150 ms. I would obviously
like it to be less (30ms would be ideal, 50ms good), but we'd need to
profile things, and it doesn't much matter.
> The thing that would be provide the most benefit IMHO would be an
> interface to libzip, using Guile's dynamic FFI; that would
Andy Wingo writes:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to bootstrap the guildhall stuff, so last week I started poking
> at Andreas' excellent dorodango (http://www.nongnu.org/dorodango/). I
> forked his repo on gitorious, removed a bunch of compat stuff for other
> implementations, imp
hi guys! I got new message for this topic.
If I run this:
>cut<
^_^[nalaginrut@Renee-desktop:guildhall]$ LANG=C
^_^[nalaginrut@Renee-desktop:guildhall]$ guild hall update
Fetching http://rotty.yi.org/doro/experimental/available.scm
Loading av
Andy Wingo skribis:
> Yeah that would be nice. I have not had much luck with FSF folk in the
> past though. I was just thinking about gcc.gnu.org which I believe is
> hosted by others.
I see you’ve emailed them in the meantime, thanks!
Ludo’.
Hi!
Andy Wingo skribis:
> On Mon 18 Jul 2011 15:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>
>>> I will see if I can get work to sponsor a server that we can use, and
>>> see if we can get it aliased to guildhall.gnu.org -- unless someone else
>>> would like to provide the server. It would be n
he original error message is Chinese since my locale is
zh_CN.utf8, so I translated it to *CONNECTION TIMEOUT*.
There're two problems under my system for guildhall:
1. I must set keep-alive to true(It's false in default). Or it will
throw the error above,and accompany with a long time ha
Hi!
Thanks for the feedback!
On Mon 18 Jul 2011 15:06, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
>> I will see if I can get work to sponsor a server that we can use, and
>> see if we can get it aliased to guildhall.gnu.org -- unless someone else
>> would like to provide the server. It would be nic
relation with dorodango goes, we should do our best to keep
> the guildhall compatible with dorodango archives on the net. We should
> also try hard to share code, but that is secondary. Farther along I
> would like to rename (dorodango ...) in our source to (guildhall ...) or
> some
The SOURCE in Makefile.am doesn't contain any file in private
directories because they don't need to declare explicitly during
compiling procedure. But we do need them if we run guildhall after "make
install".
I talked with Andy and he said "./env guild hall" is OK. I
On Fri 15 Jul 2011 21:10, writes:
> A (web client) test is failing for me:
Sorry about that! A thinko. I pushed a patch similar to yours.
Cheers,
Andy
--
http://wingolog.org/
dsm...@roadrunner.com wrote:
> The test passes with the included git diff. Seems request-host returns a
> pair instead of a string, so just use the car.
>
Bah. Looks like I hozed attaching it. Another try.
-Dale
diff --git a/test-suite/tests/web-request.test b/test-suite/tests/web-r
Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I wanted to bootstrap the guildhall stuff, so last week I started poking
> at Andreas' excellent dorodango (http://www.nongnu.org/dorodango/). I
> forked his repo on gitorious, removed a bunch of compat stuff for other
> implementations
Hi,
I wanted to bootstrap the guildhall stuff, so last week I started poking
at Andreas' excellent dorodango (http://www.nongnu.org/dorodango/). I
forked his repo on gitorious, removed a bunch of compat stuff for other
implementations, imported dependencies into the archive, replaced the
tem needs a name; we've been saying "cpan-alike" for
> too long ;-) We discussed a bit on IRC and thought that "guildhall" (or
> "guild hall") might do. It's a place where Guile craftspeople meet.
> For the moment, it looks like it will do as a na
discussed a bit on IRC and thought that "guildhall" (or
"guild hall") might do. It's a place where Guile craftspeople meet.
For the moment, it looks like it will do as a name, but if you come up
with something significantly better do let us know.
The next step is to port
59 matches
Mail list logo
