Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-14 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Thomas Morley writes: > Am Di., 13. Nov. 2018 um 01:12 Uhr schrieb Mikael Djurfeldt > : >> >> It would be nice to have guile-1.8 in that list since some users stayed at >> that version due to 2.0 being slower. > > As does LilyPond... Yes — and that’s one of the things which I see as very

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-13 Thread Thomas Morley
Am Di., 13. Nov. 2018 um 01:12 Uhr schrieb Mikael Djurfeldt : > > It would be nice to have guile-1.8 in that list since some users stayed at > that version due to 2.0 being slower. As does LilyPond... > Maybe, in time, we can get everyone back to the most recent release. :-)) I wrote some own

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-13 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Mikael Djurfeldt writes: > It would be nice to have guile-1.8 in that list since some users stayed at > that version due to 2.0 being slower. I did a first step towards that: making the benchmarking suite work with Guile 1.8.8: https://github.com/ecraven/r7rs-benchmarks/pull/38 I hope ecraven

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-12 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
It would be nice to have guile-1.8 in that list since some users stayed at that version due to 2.0 being slower. Maybe, in time, we can get everyone back to the most recent release. :-)) Den tis 13 nov. 2018 00:48 skrev Mikael Djurfeldt : > Thanks, Arne! > > Den mån 12 nov. 2018 01:04 skrev

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-12 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
Thanks, Arne! Den mån 12 nov. 2018 01:04 skrev Arne Babenhauserheide : > > Mikael Djurfeldt writes: > > > That sounds great! Can you say something about how much quicker 2.9.1 is > > compared to 2.2? > > You can find that by looking at the benchmarks by ecraven: > >

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-11 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Mikael Djurfeldt writes: > That sounds great! Can you say something about how much quicker 2.9.1 is > compared to 2.2? You can find that by looking at the benchmarks by ecraven: https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/ Comparing 2.9 and 2.2 there, you see a 30% reduction in execution time

Re: Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-11 Thread Mikael Djurfeldt
That sounds great! Can you say something about how much quicker 2.9.1 is compared to 2.2? Den sön 11 nov. 2018 21:53 skrev Stefan Israelsson Tampe < stefan.ita...@gmail.com>: > Hi, > > I've taken 2.9 on a ride with my active code bases, guile-log, > guile-syntax-parse and python-on -guile. > >

Results of tests of guile-2.9

2018-11-11 Thread Stefan Israelsson Tampe
Hi, I've taken 2.9 on a ride with my active code bases, guile-log, guile-syntax-parse and python-on -guile. Generelly it's a pleasure as always to work with guile. I can compile all code and especially the clpfd code in the prolog part works out nicely (A huge file that takes now 6minutes to