Hi,
A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp[1] could be included with
Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
code from any Guile installation via
$ guile --language=wisp []
Essentially this is about making wisp as language part of the
"batteries" of Guil
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi,
>
>
> A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp[1] could be included with
> Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
> code from any Guile installation via
>
>
> $ guile --language=wisp []
>
>
> Essentially this is about making
Hi Arne,
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp[1] could be included with
> Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
> code from any Guile installation via
>
>
> $ guile --language=wisp []
>
>
> Essentially this is about making
2017-05-13 3:52 GMT+02:00 Mark H Weaver :
> Hi Arne,
>
> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> > A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp[1] could be included with
> > Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
> > code from any Guile installation via
> >
> >
> > $ gui
Panicz Maciej Godek writes:
> 2017-05-13 3:52 GMT+02:00 Mark H Weaver :
>
>> Hi Arne,
>>
>> Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>> > A few weeks ago I asked in IRC whether wisp[1] could be included with
>> > Guile in modules/language/wisp to allow every guile users to run wisp
>> > code from any Guil
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver writes:
>> Essentially this is about making wisp as language part of the
>> "batteries" of Guile.
>
> About 4.5 years ago, I went out on a limb and added SRFI-105 (curly
> infix expressions) to core Guile. Even now, I'm of the opinion that
> judicious use of curly infix c
Hi,
Any word on this? We have ecmascript, we have elisp, we have brainfuck,
why not wisp — which is finished and stable and does not require any
non-sexp-scheme code in Guile?
Best wishes,
Arne
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
> Hi Mark,
>
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>>> Essentially this is about
Hi Arne!
Personally, I'd like to see many languages on Guile. But I prefer maintain
mine, guile-lua-rebirth and a new shell language(undone) as an external
package.
GNU official project reviews contributions too strictly, it's good for the
quality and free software ethics, but too difficult for ne
Hi Nala,
Nala Ginrut writes:
> Personally, I'd like to see many languages on Guile. But I prefer maintain
> mine, guile-lua-rebirth and a new shell language(undone) as an external
> package.
> GNU official project reviews contributions too strictly, it's good for the
> quality and free software
Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
Can someone post the sample guix specification?
I could not access from the gnunet log.
Matt Wette writes:
> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
> I could not access from the gnunet log.
Do you mean the wisp package for Guix?
It’s here:
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix.git/tree/gnu/packages/guile.scm?id=v
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>
>
> Matt Wette writes:
>> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
>> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
>> I could not access from the gnunet log.
>
> Do you mean the wisp package for Guix?
No, I mean
Matt Wette writes:
> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>> Matt Wette writes:
>>> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
>>> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
>>> I could not access from the gnunet log.
>>
>> Do you mean the wisp package f
Matt Wette writes:
>> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide wrote:
>>
>>
>> Matt Wette writes:
>>> Looks promising, especailly if the footprint is small.
>>> Can someone post the sample guix specification?
>>> I could not access from the gnunet log.
>>
>> Do you mean the wisp p
Well yes, it looks good if we have it. And I could let users of Artanis
write HTML template like Ruby slim.
http://slim-lang.com/
2017年9月19日 下午10:10，"Christopher Allan Webber" 写道：
> Matt Wette writes:
>
> >> On Sep 17, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Arne Babenhauserheide
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Matt Wette w
Arne Babenhauserheide writes:
>> For example, I've pondered the idea of making the "reader directive"
>> mechanism (e.g. things like #!curly-infix) easily extensible. For
>> example, we could perhaps arrange for 'read', when encountering "#!FOO"
>> in the input stream, to look for a module name
16 matches
Mail list logo
