Hi Stefan,
On Mon 23 Jan 2012 17:06, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
writes:
and when parse is ready to unpack S we could have
S = #(syntax-object #struct-s wrap-part hygiene)
Now I basically solve this problem by constructing
Why do syntax-datum and datum-syntax not work
Remember it's not symbols but code objects that this refers to so I need to
use the syntactic information and only augment the objects that can be
joined
and leave the other syntactic objects like symbols from another module and
so
on.
I will try to leave the struct representation and use only
Hi Stefan,
On Thu 19 Jan 2012 10:50, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
writes:
Working on porting syntax-parse is a learning experience and I know
understand how it uses syntax-local-value as a way to lookup a syntax
object by joining the wraps together with the total wrap at
Ok, here is a discussoin using code in syntax-parse.
Let's start with the defintion of a syntax-class, str in the macro package
syntax-parse:
(define-syntax-class str #:attributes () #:opaque #:commit
#:description string
(pattern (~and x (~fail #:unless (string? (syntax-e #'x))
So the
Hi,
Working on porting syntax-parse is a learning experience and I know
understand how it uses
syntax-local-value as a way to lookup a syntax object by joining the wraps
together with the
total wrap at the macro call.
The question is if this really are the total wrap e.g. contains the history
of
Hi Stefan,
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com writes:
diff --git a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm b/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
index e522f54..70463a5 100644
--- a/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
+++ b/module/ice-9/psyntax.scm
@@ -155,6 +155,10 @@
(eval-when (compile)
(set-current-module
On Mon 05 Dec 2011 19:12, Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com
writes:
(define-syntax info
(lambda (x)
(syntax-case x ()
((_ x)
(pk (syntax-binding-info (syntax-datum #'x)))
#'#f
I agree with Ian that we should be operating on syntax objects
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.comwrote:
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com writes:
So I tried to get hold of the macro binding. So with the following patch
wich should be enogh
for me to make progress porting rackets syntax parse to
Stefan Israelsson Tampe stefan.ita...@gmail.com writes:
So I tried to get hold of the macro binding. So with the following patch wich
should be enogh
for me to make progress porting rackets syntax parse to guile.
Would be very glad if we could find a interface to expose this information
