Re: Introduction

Hi Brett! Arun Isaac writes: >> Hello all, just a brief introduction. I have been in the Guile IRC group >> for a few weeks now and have been schemeing for a bit longer than that. >> I am happy to join you all. > > Welcome to the Guile community, Brett. Nice to have you here! :-) +1 :-)

Re: Introduction

> Hello all, just a brief introduction. I have been in the Guile IRC group > for a few weeks now and have been schemeing for a bit longer than that. > I am happy to join you all. Welcome to the Guile community, Brett. Nice to have you here! :-)

Introduction

Hello all, just a brief introduction. I have been in the Guile IRC group for a few weeks now and have been schemeing for a bit longer than that. I am happy to join you all. Brett

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

:) 2016-02-09 19:41 GMT+01:00 Lawrence Bottorff : > Good, good. > > >> 3. I'm not quite convinced whether \texttt{equivalence-classes} should >> be replaced with \textit{equivalence-classes}. If we actually decide >> to do so, I think it would be better to replace it as >>

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Good, good. On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 7:58 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > 2016-02-07 22:51 GMT+01:00, Lawrence Bottorff : > > I've got this fork going where > I've > > done some editing (grammar, style, spelling,

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

ut I'm desperately setting aside some quality time to read the introduction (and very much looking forward to it). I'm following this back-and-forth with much interest, so as far as I'm concerned, please stay here :-) regards - -- tomás -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU

Re: An impudent introduction to impudence

2016-02-08 21:31 GMT+01:00 Keith Wright : > Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > > > (I wonder whether we should switch to private correspondence, or > > doesn't anyone mind having such updates here?) > > I would think so. Thanks for telling us about >

An impudent introduction to impudence

Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > (I wonder whether we should switch to private correspondence, or > doesn't anyone mind having such updates here?) I would think so. Thanks for telling us about this project, it's interesting to read somebody who cares about writing on a

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > I also think it would be helpful to interface Guile with plot generation. I > see that Nala has a guile-plot package, but I haven't tried it. I > personally wrote some code for generating LaTeX pgfplots for the project, > and can add it to the repo if you llike. A

Re: Fwd: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > I see you're an expert, so perhaps you could explain to me what would the > implications be. > My original intent was to publish the software that comes along with the > book under GPL v3, because AFAIK GPL regards software, but if there's more > to it, then it would

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Say, would you like me to suggest some editing changes? Your English is great, but I've noticed a few errors. Lawrence Bottorff On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:09 PM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: > Hi, > I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled > > A

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Héllo Panicz, Le 2016-02-05 00:09, Panicz Maciej Godek a écrit : Hi, I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled A Pamphlet against R Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries that I have been

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

2016-02-05 20:46 GMT+01:00 Lawrence Bottorff : > Say, would you like me to suggest some editing changes? Your English is > great, but I've noticed a few errors. > Sure, that would be awesome! I don't think that I ever manage to work out anything comparable to native

Fwd: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Forwarded Message Subject: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 12:08:46 + From: A0 <cape.wr...@openmailbox.org> To: Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.mac...@gmail.com> Wow! What an incendiary title. I loved R before it turned into an i

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Hi 2016-02-06 1:47 GMT+01:00 Cao Jin : > It's interesting. I have used Matlab for many years, but never tried R. As > for as I know, there are tons of state-of-the-art library in R and Matlab. > > After skimming your paper, I wander that > 1) Are these library used in your code

[ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Hi, I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled A Pamphlet against R Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries that I have been developing over the last few months, including topics like: - genetic

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Hi, --- On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 4:39 AM, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote: | A Pamphlet against R | Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme \-- It would be good to emphasis on Guile Scheme and how it is helpful in computational intelligence, and remove any negative

Fwd: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

-- Forwarded message -- From: Panicz Maciej Godek <godek.mac...@gmail.com> Date: 2016-02-05 8:21 GMT+01:00 Subject: Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile To: Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> Hello Chris 2016-02-05 1:30 GMT+01:00 Christopher

Re: [ANN] An impudent introduction to Guile

Panicz Maciej Godek writes: > Hi, > I am pleased to announce that I just finished my booklet titled > > A Pamphlet against R > Computational Intelligence with Guile Scheme > > The pamphlet introduces (in a truly impertinent manner) a set of libraries > that I have been developing over the last