On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 18:10:17 -0500
Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:34:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-with-rtti): New variable.
>
> Seems okay, although would it make sense to enable this in the main LLVM
> package?
>
I think this would mak
* gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-7504.patch,
gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-7505.patch
gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-7506.patch
gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-7563.patch
gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-7564.patch
gnu/packages/patches/mupdf-CVE-2016-9017.patch
gnu/packages/p
We have the Saturday afternoon.
Pj.
> It looks like we're scheduled for Saturday.
> https://lists.fosdem.org/pipermail/fosdem/2016-October/002469.html
--
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:34:24PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> * gnu/packages/audio.scm (faust-2): New variable.
LGTM
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 08:34:23PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> * gnu/packages/llvm.scm (llvm-with-rtti): New variable.
Seems okay, although would it make sense to enable this in the main LLVM
package?
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pep8, python2-pep8):
> Add replacement.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> index 5b5287e..c6ec6d3 100644
> --- a/gnu/package
Hi,
> + #:use-module (gnu packages xml)
It's now not necessary anymore to import the "xml" module.
Not importing it cuts down on the number of module references and potential
reference cycles in the future.
Otherwise LGTM!
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:39:50PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pep8, python2-pep8):
> Add replacement.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> index 5b5
On Mon, 03 Oct 2016 16:57:34 +0200,
ng0 wrote:
>
> ng0 writes:
>
> > Can someone explain to the list how the example of the openssh-service
> > is supposed to fit into a default users config based on the regular
> > desktop.scm? So far I think this is a bad example but I have no idea how
> > to
Looks good to me!
I also invoked make in the guix directory - which didn't print any new warnings
-, reconfigured the system (for non-uefi grub) and successfully booted with it.
So all good!
* gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pep8, python2-pep8):
Add replacement.
---
gnu/packages/python.scm | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
index 5b5287e..c6ec6d3 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
@@ -
Leo Famulari writes:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:42:01PM +0200, Theodoros Foradis wrote:
>> Right. Is it normal that the url is not checked again, after having the
>> source in store?
>
> Yes, Guix finds the file named by the source hash in /gnu/store and so
> it doesn't try downloading it. Yo
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:16:28PM +0200, Theodoros Foradis wrote:
> * gnu/packages/engineering.scm (kicad): New variable.
> ---
> gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 92
>
> 1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
>
> + ("wxpython" ,python2-wxpython)))
>
* gnu/packages/engineering.scm (kicad): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/engineering.scm | 92
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/engineering.scm b/gnu/packages/engineering.scm
index 829ceb0..3d7c6ce 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/engi
* gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm (wxwidgets-gtk2): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm b/gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm
index 31da2a9..4efe7a1 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/wxwidge
* gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm (python2-wxpython): New variable.
---
gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm | 72 ++
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm b/gnu/packages/wxwidgets.scm
index 4efe7a1..69216b5 100644
--- a/gnu/packages
* gnu/packages/ncurses.scm (ncurses)[arguments]: Add ‘--enable-pc-files’
and ‘--with-pkg-config-libdir=’ to #:configure-flags. Create ‘non-wide’
compatibility symbolic links for ‘.pc’ files in the post-install-phase.
[native-inputs]: Add pkg-config.
---
gnu/packages/ncurses.scm | 22 ++
Guix,
(Intended for core-updates, since it has ‘ncurses’ in the name.)
Let ncurses install its pkg-config .pc files, and let an updated
‘progress’ use them instead of adding ever more work-arounds.
Kind regards,
T G-R
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice (2):
gnu: ncurses: Install pkg-config ‘.pc’ files.
* gnu/packages/admin.scm (progress): Update to 0.13.1.
[native-inputs]: Add pkg-config and which.
[arguments]: Drop LDFLAGS (now handled by pkg-config) from #:make-flags.
---
gnu/packages/admin.scm | 9 ++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gnu/packages/admin.scm
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 10:12:53PM +0100, Danny Milosavljevic wrote:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-sqlalchemy-utils)[description]: Include
> optional dependencies.
I changed the commit message to include the name of the changed
packages and pushed. Thanks!
In the commit title, I used the
On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Hello!
>
> GNU Guile and Guix will have their own track half a day at FOSDEM this
> year for the second time.
>
> If you work on a cool project that uses Guile, if you’ve come up with
> nice generic abstractions or crazy macros, i
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
> Hi Marius,
>
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:36:51 +
> Marius Bakke wrote:
>
>> That's it! This makes it pick up (bootloader (grub-configuration (grub
>> grub-efi))) from my config.scm:
>>
>> making '/gnu/store/kgk9rrawq9fxh1g2j6121gl3lcz47395-system' the current
>>
Hi Marius,
On Mon, 07 Nov 2016 11:36:51 +
Marius Bakke wrote:
> That's it! This makes it pick up (bootloader (grub-configuration (grub
> grub-efi))) from my config.scm:
>
> making '/gnu/store/kgk9rrawq9fxh1g2j6121gl3lcz47395-system' the current
> system...
> Installing for x86_64-efi platf
* gnu/packages/uml.scm: New file.
* gnu/local.mk (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
---
gnu/local.mk | 1 +
gnu/packages/uml.scm | 91
2 files changed, 92 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gnu/packages/uml.scm
diff --git a/gnu/local.mk b/gn
Roel Janssen writes:
> Theodoros Foradis writes:
>
>> Roel Janssen writes:
>>
>>> I tried running plantuml with the following snippet:
>>> @startuml
>>> A <..> B
>>> @enduml
>>>
>>> And it crashes because it attempts to run "/usr/bin/dot".
>>>
>>> With the following snippet, we replace this "/usr/
Hey Ludo!
On Mon, Nov 07 2016, Ludovic Courtès wrote
Could it be that you invoke the ‘daemonize’ action after
respawnable processes have been started? The manual has this
caveat (info "(shepherd) The root and unknown services"):
‘daemonize’
Fork and go into the background. This s
* gnu/system/grub.scm (gnu): Export grub-configuration-grub.
* guix/scripts/system.scm (perform-action): Use it.
Co-authored-by: Danny Milosavljevic
---
gnu/system/grub.scm | 1 +
guix/scripts/system.scm | 3 ++-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gnu/system/grub.s
Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>> Hmm, did you mean (package->drivation (grub-configuration-grub
>> (operating-system-bootloader os))) ? Otherwise it can't work.
>
> Fixing typo:
>
> Hmm, did you mean (package->derivation (grub-configuration-grub
> (operating-system-bootloader os))) ? Otherwise it
> Hmm, did you mean (package->drivation (grub-configuration-grub
> (operating-system-bootloader os))) ? Otherwise it can't work.
Fixing typo:
Hmm, did you mean (package->derivation (grub-configuration-grub
(operating-system-bootloader os))) ? Otherwise it can't work.
It gives you a derivation
Hi Carlos!
csanchez...@gmail.com (Carlos Sánchez de La Lama) skribis:
> success, finally:
>
> $ ./pre-inst-env guix build hello
> [...]
> /gnu/store/ynpd0qpppl0fdh252wns87d158pbdx8q-hello-2.10
>
> $ /gnu/store/ynpd0qpppl0fdh252wns87d158pbdx8q-hello-2.10/bin/hello
> Hello, world!
>
> $ uname -a
>
Hi Chris,
> Hope that helps!
Yeah, thank you!
(I think it would be a lot less confusing to just pass (derivation->output-path
grub) to (install-grub* ...) as well instead of that O_o)
Hi,
why not just use "fsck -t xxx" instead? It will filter out "-C" for fscks which
don't support it.
Hello,
I'm trying to build the part of sunxi-tools that is target-specific for the
target (2 tools).
However, I cannot get it to pick up armhf glibc.
What could be the cause?
I get:
arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc -g -O0 -Wall -Wextra -std=c99 -Iinclude/ -static
-D_POSIX_C_SOURCE=200112L -D_BSD_SOUR
Thomas Danckaert writes:
> From: Leo Famulari
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebkit.
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 14:45:38 -0400
>
>> Can you add a code comment mentioning that this package is not
>> officially supported by the Qt project?
>
> done!
>
> I've attached an updated patch, as well as a
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hey!
>
> Marius Bakke skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> Marius Bakke skribis:
>>>
* gnu/build/file-systems.scm (check-file-system): Drop "-C" argument
from fsck for compatibility with other fscks.
>>>
>>> Oh so fsck.ext2 would no longer show any k
Hi,
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice skribis:
> [...and now CC'ing the list because mail is hard.]
>
> Leo,
>
> On 05/11/16 19:56, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> My 2¢ are quoted from the GNU Free System Distribution Guidelines
>> [0], which Guix does follow:
>>
>> [...] they're often worded so as to make it hard
Ludovic Courtès writes:
From 940c03c7dcddec019e27f6eb1470aeab4db57799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Marius Bakke
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 17:26:52 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add grub-efi.
* gnu/packages/grub.scm (grub-efi): New variable.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
+
Hi,
Thomas Danckaert skribis:
> From: Leo Famulari
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add qtwebkit.
> Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 14:45:38 -0400
>
>> Can you add a code comment mentioning that this package is not
>> officially supported by the Qt project?
>
> done!
I agree with Leo that it’s okay to provid
Chris Marusich skribis:
> Danny Milosavljevic writes:
>
>> On Sun, 6 Nov 2016 20:52:20 +0100
>> Hartmut Goebel wrote:
>>> Thanks for this tip. I'm cuprous, though . Both "libplds4.so" and
>>> "libnspr4.so" are part of "nspr" which is specified as input.
>>
>> Yes, but will the linker embed the
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
>>> Oops, not sure what went wrong when fixing up this package for
>>> publishing. Updated patch attached.
>>
>> I think Leo was asking whether you could get a bootable system with it.
>
> Yes, I'm using this right now, on top of the recent
Hey!
Marius Bakke skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Marius Bakke skribis:
>>
>>> * gnu/build/file-systems.scm (check-file-system): Drop "-C" argument
>>> from fsck for compatibility with other fscks.
>>
>> Oh so fsck.ext2 would no longer show any kind of progress report?
>> That’s annoyi
Hi,
Carlo Zancanaro skribis:
> I've had problems with Shepherd and its daemonize action. If I run
> daemonize (as the first thing when Shepherd starts) then it fails to handle
> signals from child processes.
Could it be that you invoke the ‘daemonize’ action after respawnable
processes have bee
42 matches
Mail list logo