I'll test EXWM with emacs-no-x-toolkit.
I think the discussion around emacs-lucid started out of ignorance for
the emacs-no-x-toolkit package. If the latter happens to be a better
option, I propose that we don't add emacs-lucid but instead advertise
emacs-no-x-toolkit better, say, mention it in t
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Are there additional benefits to 'emacs-lucid' that are not already
>> addressed by 'emacs-no-x-toolkit'? I'm not necessarily opposed to
>> adding another Emacs variant, but I don't yet understand the motivation.
>
> Does EXWM run on emacs-n
Hi,
Giovanni Biscuolo writes:
> Given the size "issue" of emacs-with-gtk and the emacs warning on the
> long standing Gtk+ bug:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
>
> Warning: due to a long standing Gtk+ bug
> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/221
> Ema
