On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 07:57:19AM -0400, Greg Hogan wrote:
> Is there a best practice or example for building a library twice, both static
> and dynamic? I submitted patch #43620, and in working on another library have
> the same issue. These are cmake builds with a parameter declaration for
>
zimoun writes:
> However, I am still confused that the GNU Emacs package with default
> options (--with-modules, --with-cairo, --disable-build-details)
> depends on LLVM via GTK+ and Mesa; and not on only GNU tools.
LLVM is an optional input for Mesa which enables the Gallium 'llvmpipe'
driver,
Dear,
Let consider the package ’emacs-magit’. It does not depend on
’emacs-minimal’ but instead the argument is replaced by ’emacs-no-x’,
see:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
(build-system emacs-build-system)
(arguments
`(#:emacs ,emacs-no-x
Hi Bengt,
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 21:16, Bengt Richter wrote:
> I am wondering if there is a pure-wayland-client version of emacs, as
> discussed here[1]
About Wayland, I do not know.
> A debian emacs-nox appears to exist [2]
Do you mean the Guix package 'emacs-no-x'?
> Perhaps such an emac
Hi Simon,
On +2020-09-28 10:56:55 +0200, zimoun wrote:
> Hi Pierre,
>
> On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 12:54, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> > Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit!
>
> Cool!
>
>
> > So I suggest we add the following packages:
> >
> > --8<---cut here--
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:25, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
>
> zimoun writes:
>
> > It appears to me more logical to name it: emacs-xelb-no-x-toolkit;
> > appending the variation last.
>
> Depends how you look at it ;) But I don't have a strong opinion.
Me neither. Just it seems more consistent:
1
Pierre Neidhardt writes:
> "Bonface M. K." writes:
>
>> Wouldn't that be redundant? If you wanted to use
>> EXWM, we already have EXWM provided on MELPA, so
>> you could just set that up. That's IMHO though.
>
> Maybe there is a misunderstanding. We provide EXWM as a Guix package
> for those wh
Hi Pierre,
On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 12:54, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit!
Cool!
> So I suggest we add the following packages:
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb
>(package
Hi Mark,
On Sat, 26 Sep 2020 at 18:34, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> FYI, our 'emacs-no-x-toolkit' package has a closure size of 390.9 MiB
> and does _not_ have the Gtk bug described above. That's why I use it.
Thank you for the information. It is worth knowing. I am currently
giving it a try.
How
Le Sun, 27 Sep 2020 16:13:57 -0400,
Julien Lepiller a écrit :
Hi Julien :-)
Thank you for your answer! Of course, I accept the mentionned change. I just
need to learn how to use the robot by studing basics:
https://www.translationproject.org/html/translators.html
Once this point has been clar
10 matches
Mail list logo
