Thank you Sergio
On 01/11/2023 14:04, Sergio Pastor Pérez wrote:
Hi, Alexis.
`typst` seems to use a structure that relies on multiple smaller
crates. There has been some discussions over the IRC on how this could
be packaged using the current cargo build system.
Yes I asked the question there
Hi Zamfofex
On Wed, Nov 01 2023, zamfofex wrote:
> Please do let me know what you think about it! I’m open for suggestions and
> requests, if anyone feels like this is an interesting endeavor.
>
> This is a follow‐up to
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2023-09/msg00458.html
I re
Hi pinoaffe,
El 12/10/23 a las 20:30, pinoaffe escribió:
Hi!
I think it's important to clarify what Guix is (and I really like your
mockups/some of the concrete proposed changes), but I don't quite agree
with the idea behind your proposal.
I think it would be more useful to produce and maintai
Hi Ricardo,
On Wed, Nov 01 2023, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> What do you think about changing “guix package” and/or “guix copy” to
> better support deployment of remote profiles?
As someone who uses 'guix deploy' all the time. I believe remote
administration is one of our core strengths and selling
Hi Guix,
I build software locally and deploy the result to a remote system with
“guix copy”. This works pretty well but has a few rough edges:
1. “guix build -m manifest.scm” does not generate a profile. It only
builds the list of packages. To build a profile from a manifest file we
need to re
Hello, Guix! For anyone who might have had interest in it last time, I have
continued working on my WebAssembly cross‐compilation target for Guix, now with
support for the Meson and CMake build systems and also preliminary support for
C++.
Once again, it’s in fairly early stages currently, but
