Hi Alex,
On Wed, Jan 24, 2024 at 06:15 PM, Alex Devaure wrote:
> Hi Maxim,
>
> Thank you for your answer. I created the issue #68293 and the
> modification is now on master branch.
> Best regards,
> Alex
>
Looks like Vinicius Monego already did the update in
9c67673d7bb9cdc43c1196b075447b57aff74
Hi all,
On 2024-01-24 19:41, pukkamustard wrote:
> I've used Git Annex for managing many large files (~100s of GiBs) and it
> worked. However, I found Git Annex to be quite complex and to do things
> automatically without me fully realizing.
>
I can mirror this sentiment. As far as my experience
Hi!
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[..]
> From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
> rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next to the
> Git server¹. Git Annex looks more decentralized, allowing you to have
> several “remotes”, to check the status of
Hi,
Zheng Junjie writes:
> Maxim Cournoyer writes:
>
>> Hi Attila,
>>
>> Attila Lendvai writes:
>>
About "cheaper code path when a log level is disabled at runtime",
perhaps it can be improved in guile-lib, but otherwise that's a nice
list. I just wish we had a good logging libr
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Enge writes:
> Hello,
>
> Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:33:54AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
>> Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:16:14AM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
>> > With that in mind, ‘core-updates’ would effectively become the branch of
>> > the ‘core-packages’ team: the branc
Hi Maxim,
Thank you for your answer. I created the issue #68293 and the
modification is now on master branch.
Best regards,
Alex
Maxim Cournoyer writes:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Alex Devaure writes:
>
>> Hi all,
>> There is a new version of the RAW developer darktable. The patch #67719
>> modifies the g
Hi Ludo’
Ludovic Courtès writes:
[...]
> The question boils down to: Git-LFS or Git Annex?
>
> From a quick look (I haven’t used them), Git-LFS seems to assume a
> rather centralized model where there’s an LFS server sitting next to the
> Git server¹. Git Annex looks more decentralized, allowi
> i have prepared the rest of my commits that were needed to hunt down the
> shepherd hanging bug. you can find them at:
>
> https://codeberg.org/attila-lendvai-patches/shepherd/commits/branch/attila
FWIW, here i have the guix side of the patches (they are not required for the
shepherd changes
Hello,
On 24-01-2024 16:22, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
Hello!
I’m looking for ways to incorporate videos into the repositories of our
web sites so they’re content-addressed and properly tracked, and to
make
it easier to create backups (right now those videos are stored on our
two main servers and
Hello!
I’m looking for ways to incorporate videos into the repositories of our
web sites so they’re content-addressed and properly tracked, and to make
it easier to create backups (right now those videos are stored on our
two main servers and rsynced between them⁰; I’m talking about the videos
at
Hello,
Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:33:54AM +0100 schrieb Andreas Enge:
> Am Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 11:16:14AM +0100 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> > With that in mind, ‘core-updates’ would effectively become the branch of
> > the ‘core-packages’ team: the branch where we update packages in these
> > file
Hi Attila,
Attila Lendvai writes:
>> About "cheaper code path when a log level is disabled at runtime",
>> perhaps it can be improved in guile-lib, but otherwise that's a nice
>> list. I just wish we had a good logging library in Guile and could stop
>> reinventing the wheel left and right.
>
>
> About "cheaper code path when a log level is disabled at runtime",
> perhaps it can be improved in guile-lib, but otherwise that's a nice
> list. I just wish we had a good logging library in Guile and could stop
> reinventing the wheel left and right.
i've made my judgement that the logger in g
13 matches
Mail list logo
