missing before
>> this edit)?
>
> Attached patch includes my name.
>
> Troy
>
> From 6381b62a3774001f630d868fa7e58acc28b0cc4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Troy Sankey <sankey...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:45:55 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] doc: clar
.
Troy
From 6381b62a3774001f630d868fa7e58acc28b0cc4f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Sankey <sankey...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:45:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] doc: clarification for hashing git checkouts
When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
direc
ame or
nickname in the section of guix.texi where document author names
are included, if applicable (ie if your name is missing before
this edit)?
> From 42b26d3601a6318bcefa4dfe4018daddc521e27a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Troy Sankey <sankey...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:45:55 -0400
&
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> Hashing sources is becoming quite compilated! I can't wait until 'guix
> download' supports git, then this could be automated.
In that case, `guix download` would need to take a Git hash as an
argument.
In general, I think it's a
Yes, that is how I understand it previously did not work for me.
Thanks :)
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:33:40AM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> Quoting Pjotr Prins (2016-07-10 20:13:26)
> > And only now I am understanding a problem ages ago. Would this also be
> > the reason for git sub-modules not to
Quoting Pjotr Prins (2016-07-10 20:13:26)
> And only now I am understanding a problem ages ago. Would this also be
> the reason for git sub-modules not to work?
Pjotr,
If I'm understanding correctly, you failed to generate the hash of a git
repository containing submodules? In that case, you
uix hash' before
they learn the name of the tool.
Troy
From 42b26d3601a6318bcefa4dfe4018daddc521e27a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Troy Sankey <sankey...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Jul 2016 17:45:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] doc: clarification for hashing git checkouts
When hashing git checkouts of packages
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 07:16:30PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> > When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
> > directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
> > page in
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:54:38PM -0400, Troy Sankey wrote:
> When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
> directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
> page in the documentation.
Yes! This is one that *everybody* has to ask.
I
When hashing git checkouts of packages, packagers must first remove the .git
directory. This commit adds this clarification to the "Invoking guix hash"
page in the documentation.
---
doc/guix.texi | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/doc/guix.texi b/doc/guix.texi
index
10 matches
Mail list logo
