On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:48:54AM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Leo Famulari writes:
> >
> > > I think we should remove xmonad from the lightweight-desktop OS
> > > declaration example. Xmonad is not "lightweight" in
John Darrington writes:
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
>
> Sure it is!
>
> What I meant is that Ratpoison is not the most "intuitive" WM for non
> GNU Emacs/Screen users. As a consequence adding it in an example
> configuration w
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 11:33:24AM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Leo Famulari writes:
>
> > I think we should remove xmonad from the lightweight-desktop OS
> > declaration example. Xmonad is not "lightweight" in terms of disk space
> > or bandwidth, since it requires GHC, which is 859 M
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 04:48:55PM +0100, Mathieu Lirzin wrote:
Sure it is!
What I meant is that Ratpoison is not the most "intuitive" WM for non
GNU Emacs/Screen users. As a consequence adding it in an example
configuration which is likely to be copy and paste, is
Hello Clément,
Clément Lassieur writes:
> Mathieu Lirzin writes:
>
>> While we are on this lightweight template, what would you think of
>> replacing ratpoison with something less "exotic" like openbox? :)
>
> What do you mean by "exotic"? Isn't that subjective? :)
Sure it is!
What I meant i
On Wed, Feb 22, 2017 at 03:02:39PM +0100, Cl??ment Lassieur wrote:
Mathieu Lirzin writes:
> While we are on this lightweight template, what would you think of
> replacing ratpoison with something less "exotic" like openbox? :)
What do you mean by "exotic"? Isn't th
Mathieu Lirzin writes:
> While we are on this lightweight template, what would you think of
> replacing ratpoison with something less "exotic" like openbox? :)
What do you mean by "exotic"? Isn't that subjective? :)
Here are the results of "guix size":
- ratpoison: 172.6 MiB,
- i3-wm: 263.
Hi,
Leo Famulari writes:
> I think we should remove xmonad from the lightweight-desktop OS
> declaration example. Xmonad is not "lightweight" in terms of disk space
> or bandwidth, since it requires GHC, which is 859 MiB uncompressed.
Makes sense.
> Also, the i3 window manager is not very usef
I think we should remove xmonad from the lightweight-desktop OS
declaration example. Xmonad is not "lightweight" in terms of disk space
or bandwidth, since it requires GHC, which is 859 MiB uncompressed.
Also, the i3 window manager is not very useful without dmenu and
i3status, so I think we shoul
