Ludovic Courtès writes:
>> Do you want me to define an alias for “emms” now in the manner you
>> suggested in your email from 2015? Or should this be done once the UI
>> supports dealing with deprecated packages?
>
> Once the UI is done. Currently this would have no effect.
Okay, pushed to ma
Ricardo Wurmus skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Alex Kost skribis:
>>
>>> Ricardo Wurmus (2016-06-29 08:45 +0300) wrote:
>>>
Hi Guix,
I think we need to rename the “emms” package to “emacs-emms”. (This is
what
the first patch does.) Currently, the emacs-build-
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Alex Kost skribis:
>
>> Ricardo Wurmus (2016-06-29 08:45 +0300) wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guix,
>>>
>>> I think we need to rename the “emms” package to “emacs-emms”. (This is what
>>> the first patch does.) Currently, the emacs-build-system will only add to
>>> the
>>> Emacs
Alex Kost skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus (2016-06-29 08:45 +0300) wrote:
>
>> Hi Guix,
>>
>> I think we need to rename the “emms” package to “emacs-emms”. (This is what
>> the first patch does.) Currently, the emacs-build-system will only add to
>> the
>> Emacs “load-path” the “site-lisp” directori
Ricardo Wurmus (2016-06-29 08:45 +0300) wrote:
> Hi Guix,
>
> I think we need to rename the “emms” package to “emacs-emms”. (This is what
> the first patch does.) Currently, the emacs-build-system will only add to the
> Emacs “load-path” the “site-lisp” directories of packages that start with
>
Hi Guix,
I think we need to rename the “emms” package to “emacs-emms”. (This is what
the first patch does.) Currently, the emacs-build-system will only add to the
Emacs “load-path” the “site-lisp” directories of packages that start with
“emacs-”. I think it may be necessary to relax this requir
