Re: SSSD, Kerberized NFSv4 and Bacula OFF TOPIC PRAISE

August 24, 2023 3:57 PM, "Martin Baulig" wrote: > Hello, > > About 2–3 months ago, I got an initial prototype of Bacula working on GNU > Guix. I had the Bacula > Director, two separate Storage Daemons and the Baculum web interface running > in a GNU Guix VM on my > Synology NAS. I had to look

Re: Merging core-updates? OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Christopher Baines writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Julien Lepiller writes: >> >>> As discussed at Guix Days before Fosdem, we haven't merged core-updates >>> in a very long time. I'd volunteer to lead this effort, but I don't >>> know what steps I should follow. Do we have some docume

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Hi Raghav, On Wed, 20 Jul 2022 at 12:03, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > [1] The idea isn't off-topic, because, Guix is meant to be kernel > agnostic. So exploring HyperbolaBSD as a kernel option for Guix is with > in the prospect. Hum, I do not think that Guix is agnostic about

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

On 20-07-2022 18:03, Raghav Gururajan wrote: [2] IIUC, HyperbolaBSD (OS) consist of a custom-made kernel and a custom-made userspace, both of which the components are either derived from OpenBSD System or written from scratch. So two things can be explored, *separately*. (A) Guix System with

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Hello Guix! I'd like to add following points to this discourse: [1] The idea isn't off-topic, because, Guix is meant to be kernel agnostic. So exploring HyperbolaBSD as a kernel option for Guix is with in the prospect. [2] IIUC, HyperbolaBSD (OS) consist of a custom-made ke

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

July 15, 2022 7:23 AM, "Csepp" wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian writes: > > > If the goal is to produce highly secure servers than I'd like to suggest > unikernels once again. No Guix running on the deployed server, but the > server image is built by and possibly deployed by Guix. > Of course the do

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

July 14, 2022 11:38 AM, "Vagrant Cascadian" wrote: > On 2022-07-14, zimoun wrote: > >> Well, dreaming about science fiction, it appears me more approachable to >> have Guix running on something as Debian/kfreeBSD – it could be an >> interesting project with the help of Debian folks. Other said,

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

July 14, 2022 9:06 AM, "zimoun" wrote: > Hi Tobias, All, > > (French Bastille Day is a day off, so a day for trolling. ;-)) > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 10:40, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > >> https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap > > Thanks for the link. It is helpf

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

July 14, 2022 6:24 AM, "zimoun" wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:44, Joshua Branson wrote: > > Well, I am missing where it is announced. Could you be more specific? Someone else already provided the link, but someone on irc did ask me where the source code for HyperbolaBSD is? I c

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Vagrant Cascadian writes: > [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]] > On 2022-07-14, zimoun wrote: >> Well, dreaming about science fiction, it appears me more approachable to >> have Guix running on something as Debian/kfreeBSD – it could be an >> interesting project with the help of Debian folks. Other

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

On 2022-07-14, zimoun wrote: > Well, dreaming about science fiction, it appears me more approachable to > have Guix running on something as Debian/kfreeBSD – it could be an > interesting project with the help of Debian folks. Other said, “just” > replace the Linux kernel by a variant of the FreeBS

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Hi Tobias, All, (French Bastille Day is a day off, so a day for trolling. ;-)) On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 at 10:40, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote: > https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap/ Thanks for the link. It is helpful for understanding. :-) > Far from 'recent' in my b

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

On 14 July 2022 10:23:49 UTC, zimoun wrote: > Well, I am missing where it is announced. Could you be more specific? https://www.hyperbola.info/news/announcing-hyperbolabsd-roadmap/ Far from 'recent' in my book. Whatever my opinion on WSL, Darwin, and the Hurd, I must concede that they at leas

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Hi, On Mon, 11 Jul 2022 at 18:44, Joshua Branson wrote: > The Hyperbola GNU/Linux team recently announced that they would ditch > Linux for OpenBSD. They are using the OpenBSD kernel and the OpenBSD > userland. And they are GPL-ing all of the code. It sounds like they will > have to replace 20%

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Josselin Poiret writes: > Hello, > > Joshua Branson writes: > >> I would love for Guix to be a Multi Kernel package manager (I mean it >> works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real >> life). My dream would be to port Guix to Plan 9 ;-) > > I don't think Guix runs

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Akib Azmain Turja writes: > Joshua Branson writes: > I did not write the below sentence. I was quoting the previous discussion found on guix devel. >> (I mean it >> works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real >> life) > > Really? I found tons of bugs in the Hurd

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Josselin Poiret writes: > Hello, > > Joshua Branson writes: > To be clear, I did not write the next paragraph. I was quoting the previous discussion. :) >> I would love for Guix to be a Multi Kernel package manager (I mean it >> works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd use

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Hello, Joshua Branson writes: > I would love for Guix to be a Multi Kernel package manager (I mean it > works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real > life). My dream would be to port Guix to Plan 9 ;-) I don't think Guix runs on the Hurd in the same way that Guix ru

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Joshua Branson writes: > (I mean it > works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real > life) Really? I found tons of bugs in the Hurd port, causing it to not even boot properly. -- Akib Azmain Turja This message is signed by me with my GnuPG key. It's fingerprint i

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

indieterminacy writes: > > I recall dicussing this topic area with you last year: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00080.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00082.html > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00083.html > https:

Re: Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

On 12-07-2022 00:44, Joshua Branson wrote: Sorry for starting this centuries flame war, but I can't help but be more and more impressed with OpenBSD. It seems ideal for small scale servers (aka NOT large databases). It tries really hard to be secure by default and has great documentation. Wi

Could Guix System eventually run on top of HyperbolaBSD ? slightly off topic

Sorry for starting this centuries flame war, but I can't help but be more and more impressed with OpenBSD. It seems ideal for small scale servers (aka NOT large databases). It tries really hard to be secure by default and has great documentation. With OpenBSD it is easy to set up a static webs

Re: [off-topic]

Hi, For French-speaker, here Emacs+Org+Guix at the previous Guix wrokshop: I also recom

[off-topic]

Hello, I noticed an interesting report^1 on the holistic approach from Emacs and how its 'additive solutions' assist problem solving for researchers. Given Guix's emphasis on reproducible research I felt it worth sharing given overlapping concerns. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/matthe

Re: IT jobs in Switzerland OFF TOPIC JOKE

(I got this mail from other channels, bleurgh...). Zig, Switzerland would be more cool. CVs are only accepted in APL format. Jonathan McHugh indieterminacy@libre.brussels September 24, 2021 5:22 PM, "Joshua Branson" wrote: > Gábor Boskovits writes: > >> Hello guix, >>

Re: IT jobs in Switzerland OFF TOPIC JOKE

Gábor Boskovits writes: > Hello guix, > > The firm where I am working now is hiring. > > Location: Zug, Switzerland. People willing to work in office will be > preferred. The firm helps with relocation if needed. > > Profile: HFT crypto startup > > Codebase: c++, python > Tooling: k8s, gitlab I

Re: Libre GPU/VPU/SOC updates/OFF TOPIC

On Wed, 30 Jun 2021 23:08:28 +0200 Ricardo Wurmus wrote: > It was never completed. I supported the campaign back then, but I > never received that first EOMA68-A20 “Libre Tea” computer card. For porting to the EOMA68-A20 we can use similar hardware that uses the same SOC. For the Libre-SOC p

Re: Libre GPU/VPU/SOC updates/OFF TOPIC

was never completed. I supported the campaign back then, but I never received that first EOMA68-A20 “Libre Tea” computer card. Apologies if this is too off topic. It is. There isn’t anything Guix folks can do to make Guix run on non-existent hardware ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ -- Ricardo

Libre GPU/VPU/SOC updates/OFF TOPIC

ut. there is a time limit on the NLnet funding. #+END_SRC 1) https://video.hardlimit.com/videos/watch/playlist/41587906-bec9-4bae-801a-b8a4c91960ce?playlistPosition=3&resume=true The video is also available via the other dominant proprietary video platform... Apologies if this is too off topi

Re: Feedback on a new simple firewall service OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Solene Rapenne writes: > Hello, > > I'm looking for advices and feedback. I wrote a simple service (reusing > the iptables service as a start) that I called "firewall", the purpose maybe eventually it could use nftables, which is the better newer version. > is to block all incoming ports and li

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

Ryan et al, Some notes follow: What can we do about the bundled jquery and bootstrap here? https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/tree/master/item/_static/jquery https://git.sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/tree/master/item/_static/bootstrap The jquery and bootstrap code is required by this jinja template:

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

On April 11, 2021, jgart wrote: > package fosspay for guix and write a service for it Nice idea, that looks like a really useful little service. If any Guix maintainers are supported by community donations, send your links so we can pitch in!

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

I think one sustainable (no pun intended) way to proceed is to package fosspay for guix and write a service for it: https://sr.ht/~sircmpwn/fosspay/ I created a public kanban board entry for it below to get started: https://board.disroot.org/project/guix-packaging/us/677?kanban-status=12312

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

ilmu writes: > Hi guys, > > A bit crazy maybe but how about we completely redefine what money is? Sure, why not? That's what guix is all about. Let's dare new things! > > I wrote "this" (the attachment or http://datalisp.is) over the weekend > (in one sitting! very raw, sorry if it's hard to

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

Hi guys, A bit crazy maybe but how about we completely redefine what money is? I wrote "this" (the attachment or http://datalisp.is) over the weekend (in one sitting! very raw, sorry if it's hard to understand, feel free to ask me any questions). Actually from seeing this: > Joshua Branson (j

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

Leo Famulari writes: > On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:05:00PM -0400, Joshua Branson wrote: >> Aloha you lovely people! I personally believe that people should make >> business out of free software. Here are some of my business ideas >> involving GNU Guix. I invite you all to beat me to market! > >

Re: Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

On Tue, Apr 06, 2021 at 12:05:00PM -0400, Joshua Branson wrote: > Aloha you lovely people! I personally believe that people should make > business out of free software. Here are some of my business ideas > involving GNU Guix. I invite you all to beat me to market! VPS service that accepts a con

Meta guix: making money with GNU Guix: slightly off topic

software games. I'm sure guix could help you do this is some way... - If we package sourcehut, people could try to compete with Drew Devault. Though that guy works 80 hours a week. So best of luck competing against him! Thanks! Joshua Apologies if this is off topic. Please let me

Re: Security related tooling project OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Christopher Baines writes: > Joshua Branson writes: > >> Christopher Baines writes: >> >>> 1: https://git.cbaines.net/guix/tooling-to-improve-security-and-trust/about/ >> >> Are you using guix system to serve the above link? I didn't realize >> that gitolite could render a README document so w

Re: Security related tooling project OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Joshua Branson writes: > Christopher Baines writes: > >> Hey, >> >> In May last year (2020), I submitted an application to NLNet. The work I >> set out wasn't something I was doing at the time, but something I hadn't >> yet found time to work on, tooling specifically around security issues. >>

Re: Security related tooling project OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Christopher Baines writes: > Hey, > > In May last year (2020), I submitted an application to NLNet. The work I > set out wasn't something I was doing at the time, but something I hadn't > yet found time to work on, tooling specifically around security issues. > > The application got a bit lost, p

Re: PowerShell core? off topic praise

This is why I love guix! Everyone is super respectful. I know I've asked some questionable (newbie) questions before, and everyone always treated me with dignity! We've got some kind people here! Thanks! February 2, 2021 2:52 PM, "Leo Famulari" wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 06:35:14PM +0

Re: Possible bug in configuration-system? and an off topic quotation

You're welcome! "Happy Hunger Games! And may the odds be ever in your favor." January 28, 2021 1:26 PM, "Raghav Gururajan" wrote: > Hi Joshua! > >> Here it is! >> http://issues.guix.gnu.org/46130 > > Thanks so much. > > Regards, > RG.

Re: File search progress: database review and question on triggers OFF TOPIC PRAISE

Thanks for working on this! This is a super awesome feature! Best of luck! -- Joshua Branson Sent from Emacs and Gnus

Re: (Really) Free Software future Was: Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, ...

On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 12:07 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > Perhaps we should divide free software into two groups: 1) Really > free software where Freedom 1 applies and 2) not-so-free software > where Freedom 1 does no longer applies. > > Here gnome and systemd are in the second kind. Both GNOME

Re: (Really) Free Software future Was: Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, ...

On Mon, 2019-10-14 at 12:07 +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Sun, 2019-10-13 at 21:44 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,]]] > > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires yo

(Really) Free Software future Was: Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, ...

On Sun, 2019-10-13 at 21:44 -0400, Richard Stallman wrote: > [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]] > [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies,]]] > [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example.]]] > > Indeed, gnu-system-discuss

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Dne 13. 10. 19 v 15:05 Kete via Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution. napsal(a): > Besides, there is no way these men are getting these transactions > without assault or coercion taking place. Generally speaking, older men have sex or relationships with younger women – it is not

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Le dimanche 13 octobre 2019, 15:05:06 CEST Kete via Discussions about the development of the GNU system a écrit : > Besides, there is no way these men are getting these transactions > without assault or coercion taking place. Just because Epstein mediated > that force so that the clients didn't ha

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

On 10/12/2019 05:19 AM, Jean Louis wrote: > https://geoff.greer.fm/2019/09/30/in-defense-of-richard-stallman "In short: Stallman made some technically-correct-but-utterly-tactless comments" Here are the comments: “deceased AI ‘pioneer’ Marvin Minsky (who is accused of assaulting one o

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

* Alexandre François Garreau [2019-10-11 13:53]: > Le jeudi 10 octobre 2019 12:24:35 CEST, vous avez écrit : > > * Alexandre François Garreau [2019-10-10 11:55]: > > > > I don't know how to defend anybody in public by silencing talk. > > > > > > Answering whenever appropriate, currently only whe

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

* Kete via Discussions about the development of the GNU system [2019-10-12 03:28]: > On 10/11/2019 04:43 PM, Alexander Vdolainen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On 10/11/19 11:16 PM, Kete via Discussions about the development of the > > GNU system wrote: > >> On 10/10/2019 05:02 PM, Jean Louis wrote: > >

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

too bad. Do you need more email space? I can lend you some On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 04:44:03PM +, ng0 wrote: > Oi. > Shut up and get another audience for your monologue theater act. > I am no longer involved in guix that much, but your trash keeps > piling up in my inbox. -- So many immig

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

On October 10, 2019 8:29:06 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >Jean Louis wrote: >> How are you? > >Ehm... Fine. What is the occasion to ask? We are then from different cultures simply. At my side it is always used similarly as hand shaking. >> I [] see absolutely no prob

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Jean Louis wrote: > How are you? Ehm... Fine. What is the occasion to ask? > On October 10, 2019 12:39:00 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back? > > Me for sure not intentionally and Guix managers are anywa

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

How are you? On October 10, 2019 12:39:00 PM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back? Me for sure not intentionally and Guix managers are anyway conducting censorship... So no big deal. You can resend what you wish.

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

It is not harmful if Guix remains free software, how it can be? It is only harmful for Guix. It was not my decision, it is theirs. On October 10, 2019 11:39:42 AM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> wrote: >Jean Louis wrote: >> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]: >> - and then wit

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Did you move it offlist intentionally? If not, may I resend it back? Jean Louis wrote: > On October 10, 2019 11:39:42 AM UTC, Dmitry Alexandrov <321...@gmail.com> > wrote: >>Jean Louis wrote: >>> * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]: >>> - and then within that group there is now a hostile

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

> Wow! Ease off a bit! > > You might not noticed that, but today Guix is the most vivid part of > GNU. And I could not image an action, that might cause more damage to > GNU project, than urging Guix lead developers to leave. Even if you > believe that forking software over political discord is

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Oi. Shut up and get another audience for your monologue theater act. I am no longer involved in guix that much, but your trash keeps piling up in my inbox.

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

Jean Louis wrote: > * Alexander Vdolainen [2019-10-09 23:13]: > - and then within that group there is now a hostile takeover group of people > starting with Ludovic Courtès and his "fellows" where none of them could > answer my email to provide me with the facts about their statement. They are

Re: Proposal to remove the off-topic, not free software related thoughtcrime accusations from the Guix project pages on GNU.ORG websitew

you to speak out your mind now. I will > > publish your opinion or lack of opinion. I will publish facts you > > provide me or lack of those facts. > > > > So far there is no fact that support their statements. > > > > Free speech is human right, and RMS has free

Re: [OFF-TOPIC] Anyone providing gratis mailing list hosting for any small group?

Hello. I am the person Adonay is aiding. On 14 June 2017 at 09:50, Adonay Felipe Nogueira wrote: > NOTE: I'm Cc'ing the person I'm aiding, but I don't know if the person is > subscribed to the list, so I think you should send a wide reply I have just subscribed to guix-devel. > However, I'm not

[OFF-TOPIC] Anyone providing gratis mailing list hosting for any small group?

NOTE: I'm Cc'ing the person I'm aiding, but I don't know if the person is subscribed to the list, so I think you should send a wide reply (reply to all of us). Hi all, this might be off-topic because hosting isn't the main subject of this list, but since there was a t